Industrial Helix wrote:Lack of input does not nec. mean that a map is deserving of a stamp. In fact, it might indicate the exact opposite: that there is no interest.
However, I don't think that is the case with this map.
Yeah if the map was still at the melting pot or early stages of gameplay, I could interpret the lack of input as lack of interest, but at this point I also think this is not the case. Although there have been some people who hated the map (mibi, yeti) there has also been people who loved it (beals, coleman) so I guess it's a kind of hate-it-or-love-it map. Which is fine with me, you can never please everyone...
Giving it the once over a few things stand out to me:
The flags could be darker as right now they're a bit light and hazy.
Which flags? The ones on the moon or the ones on the shuttles? The ones on the shuttles I could agree on, but the ones on the moon look fine to me.
In the Mission Objectives panel... the sea bonus information and the shuttle information and the flag info merges right into each other and it took me a while to realize that the sea bonuses were independent of having flag bonuses. I'd suggest a thin vertical blue line to separate the information. Or if you're feeling ambitious, break it up into three Mission objective panels.
Hmm, I see what you mean, and I don't think exactly making three independent panels would be good, but perhaps something like thin metal dividers in similar style as the frame could work. I'll see what I can do.
Why is South Africa ZA and not SA?
Earlier I had China as CH and South Africa as SA but it was pointed out to me that CH stands for Chile and SA stands for Saudi-Arabia. ZA is apparently the official two-letter country code for South Africa so I changed it on request.