natty_dread wrote:Sorry for bringing this up so late, but I just noticed it myself.
Does anyone think the Lund-Norway connection is a bit hard to see on the small?
I'll make it clearer
Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:Sorry for bringing this up so late, but I just noticed it myself.
Does anyone think the Lund-Norway connection is a bit hard to see on the small?
ender516 wrote:Incandenza wrote:natty_dread wrote:Sorry for bringing this up so late, but I just noticed it myself.
Does anyone think the Lund-Norway connection is a bit hard to see on the small?
Didn't even realize they touched, so that would be a yes.
Seconded. (Man, I rely on BOB so much.) Though I do wonder, sometimes, if perhaps a map should have the occasional sneaky bit like this, just to make players examine the map as carefully as all the Foundry folk do, hmm?
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:I'm ready to play it.
The Brittany border color needs filled in. (Spot below naval battle site)
The lower 1/2 of the channel between OI and DK could be closed.
Glad England got moved up... Didn't hurt map integrity at all did it Kab.
Something looks funky at the Ws. - London - Yorkshire tert borders. You have some strays and the actually border lines are light.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Raskholnikov wrote:Russian Winter territories are decay territories: -2 per turn to troops stationed there to a limit of 1.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users