Conquer Club

Blitzaholic [cleared]lv

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Blitzaholic [cleared]lv

Postby wizworm on Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:48 am

Accused:

Blitzaholic
Jobiwan
manic_prophet
american_ninja



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Other:



Game number(s):

Game 6994908


Comments:

Quads game, manual troops, all 4 team members deployed all troops to the 1 player who happens to be ranked general.
on their turn the multi accounts deploy all of their units to the general and never attack. Even if the're human players this is at best unsportsmanlike conduct
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class wizworm
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby jefjef on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:07 am

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: =D> =D> =D> =D>

It's the STRATEGY for manual deploy.

Good luck in the game. :roll:
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby 4 U 2 NV on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:09 am

each player in question is well known by others on the site. it's a strategy that is commonly used on this map. unless they have been playing all of the CC community all these years, they will be cleared. it'll be suggested to you to foe them and move on.

manual troop deployments allow for this strategy to occur. if you're not a fan of it, keep away.
Image
User avatar
Brigadier 4 U 2 NV
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby Woodruff on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:16 am

wizworm wrote:Quads game, manual troops, all 4 team members deployed all troops to the 1 player who happens to be ranked general.
on their turn the multi accounts deploy all of their units to the general and never attack. Even if the're human players this is at best unsportsmanlike conduct


Almost certainly not multis.

Illegal? No. Pathetic? Yes.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby TheForgivenOne on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:19 am

Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?

Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.

Don't like it? don't play manual
Image
Game 1675072
2018-08-09 16:02:06 - Mageplunka69: its jamaica map and TFO that keep me on this site
User avatar
Major TheForgivenOne
 
Posts: 5996
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby lord voldemort on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:22 am

nice stripes to lower his rank lol
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby grifftron on Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:14 am

3 letters... L O L

-griff
Image
User avatar
Major grifftron
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 3280
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:11 am

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby alster on Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:20 am

wizworm wrote:Accused:

Blitzaholic
Jobiwan
manic_prophet
american_ninja



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Other:



Game number(s):

Game 6994908


Comments:

Quads game, manual troops, all 4 team members deployed all troops to the 1 player who happens to be ranked general.
on their turn the multi accounts deploy all of their units to the general and never attack. Even if the're human players this is at best unsportsmanlike conduct


Haha! You just made my day mate! :D
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class alster
 
Posts: 3083
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Sweden...

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby Army of GOD on Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:01 am

TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?

Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.

Don't like it? don't play manual


I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7190
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby john9blue on Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:09 am

Welcome to the types of strategies that get you to the top of the scoreboard.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby Natascha on Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:29 am

:lol:

definitely no multi's.
It is the strategy on this map with manual deployment.

cheers,
Tascha
FBI = Fabulous Body Inside
Corporal 1st Class Natascha
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:10 pm

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby clapper011 on Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:50 am

AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class clapper011
 
Posts: 7208
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:25 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby gcwca_4_life on Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:55 am

Army of GOD wrote:
TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?

Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.

Don't like it? don't play manual


I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.

Hey. You can decide who is on your team, most of the time. But you can rarely ever decide who your playing against in public games. Anyone could join. ;)




This thread is a joke, and a waste of time. If you don't like the way manual deployment is played, then stay away from it! It's what I do. ;)
tdans wrote:lets rock this joint :D... or.. lets have them Blow this,,,,,, joint

I'm the insane guy, that you never wanna meet... See the end of my blade? It's sharp. hehe
Lieutenant gcwca_4_life
 
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby jefjef on Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:04 am

Army of GOD wrote:
TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?

Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.

Don't like it? don't play manual


I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Whats with the crap attitude? Rank envy?

There is not a single thing wrong with that game EXCEPT for a couple MULTI's on team 2.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby Bones2484 on Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:58 am

clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.
User avatar
Major Bones2484
 
Posts: 2307
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:24 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA (G1)

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby jefjef on Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:13 pm

Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)
Last edited by jefjef on Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby jbrettlip on Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:22 pm

This should be up for thread of the year. I always knew Blitz was doing something pathetic and illegal when we played team games....now my eyes have been opened. HHAHAHHA

Does OP know there is team chat, to help coordinate moves?
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Lieutenant jbrettlip
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby clapper011 on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:01 pm

jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)

well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have? ;))
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class clapper011
 
Posts: 7208
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:25 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby stahrgazer on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:10 pm

It's a team game with no spoils. Deploying on one guy to do the kills makes sense...regardless of the map... as long as the other members of the team aren't in danger of being taken out.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby eddie2 on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:10 pm

clapper011 wrote:
jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)

well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have? ;))
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby clapper011 on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:13 pm

eddie2 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:
jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)

well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have? ;))

is that an invite to team up with me then eddie?...
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class clapper011
 
Posts: 7208
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:25 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby Army of GOD on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:13 pm

jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)


I only capitalized AGAINST to put an extra emphasis on the fact that he's the only player above Sargent in the game.

And, yea, he can't choose who joins his games but sometimes he KNOWS who's going to join. Like when someone makes 40 1v1 games on Feudal and 37 fill up with New Recruits.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7190
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby Natascha on Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:35 pm

I am wondering why people think this strategy is pathetic.

This is a game site, and we all play games to try to WIN. When the best strategy is: deploy on 1 person & he does the main work, then I would say this is good teamwork.

Why should people drop/attack on other places if that makes your team loose the game????


Besides, Blitz & team created those games, no one knows which people or what ranks will join other team!

cheers,
tascha
FBI = Fabulous Body Inside
Corporal 1st Class Natascha
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:10 pm

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby jefjef on Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:43 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
jefjef wrote:
Bones2484 wrote:
clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.


Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.

AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.


Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.


So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.

Rank envy much? So so SAD.

EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)


I only capitalized AGAINST to put an extra emphasis on the fact that he's the only player above Sargent in the game.

And, yea, he can't choose who joins his games but sometimes he KNOWS who's going to join. Like when someone makes 40 1v1 games on Feudal and 37 fill up with New Recruits.


Well this isn't one of those cases is it?
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Blitzaholic

Postby L M S on Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:00 pm

Perhaps you should sit there and take notes, or at least try and look pretty.
“One of God's own prototypes.....never even considered for mass production.
Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class L M S
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado USA

Next

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users