Moderator: Tournament Directors
Silver- wrote:HighlanderAttack wrote:...
but for new players to come in and challenge now is very unfair to him and any other player at the top. That is my opinion anyway.
I am fully agree with you.
Lufsen75 wrote:I will not stop new och players without chance.
It can be important in the next tournament where I will give everyone an option to keep half of their maps but least one anyway.
And Silver-. I didnt see any challenge from you.
Falkomagno wrote:I challenge Battle of iraq
AAFitz wrote:Lufsen75 wrote:I will not stop new och players without chance.
It can be important in the next tournament where I will give everyone an option to keep half of their maps but least one anyway.
And Silver-. I didnt see any challenge from you.
Well, dont be surprised when on round 100 this entire tourney becomes pointless. Seriously, reconsider for the good of the tourney.
Lock it now. If not I will invite some players to the tourney myself. They of course can decide who they want to challege, but my guess is they would find easier people to beat than me.
Dont let this be stolen lufsen. Even one new player that would be impossible to trace could ruin the whole thing.
When I saw the lock on round 95 I thought it was for players, now I see it was for the maps.
This posibility was why I never had any hopes of winning this anyways, because its so easily manipulated, and though I posted i may, I of course would never skew the tourney like that....but there is no doubt some that would.....except. At the top of this tourney there is no one that actually would. But that wouldnt stop someone from taking it upon themselves...and once round 100 gets here, theres nothing you can do about it.
If 30 new players come in and challenge the top players, the winner will be decided right there, and theres no undoing it.
Even now one only needs to send out some pms to others in the tourney that havent played for a while. But again, I dont think anyone would actually do this, but I think its a mistake to allow the possibility.
If I did invite 10 players, and they did happen to decide to challenge someone else, theres nothing you can really do about it, except suspect it. If one only invites, and does not say who to challenge...theres technically nothing wrong with it...except, that it will ruin the entire tourney.
HighlanderAttack wrote:First of all I need to apologize to hondacbr because he has been playing for many rounds now. There is a new Bring it on tourney listing with three !!!
Falkomagno wrote:I challenge Battle of iraq
Lufsen75 wrote:Last round Started. Only those that own a map can challenge a last time. The list are in my secret area.
Bring it ON!!!
barterer2002 wrote:I haven't played here for a while but wanted to thank Luf for organizing this one. It was an enjoyable structure with some fludity that allowed people to join at different times and drop out if they needed too. One of the most unique and well run in CC history IMO. It was hard enough to run with 2 organizers but losing TKT last summer and having to run it alone must surely tax Luf a bit and he's kept up all this time. Well done Luf, Well done.
ben79 wrote:100 = challenge luxembourg, if not available, challenge england map
ben.
Falkomagno wrote:Can I challenge charleston? otherrwise, I would challenge Third Crusade
Users browsing this forum: No registered users