safariguy5 wrote:Damn, double time guys, can't let them jump out to this lead like this...
yes you can, dont listen to him guys!
Moderator: Clan Directors
safariguy5 wrote:Damn, double time guys, can't let them jump out to this lead like this...
reptile wrote:lol... us or O&H?
reptile wrote:lol . im lost, i think you must be talking about O&H as LoW has never faced FOED...
danryan wrote:He was making a little funny. There was a cc dispatch or something where george interviewed someone from LOW and they attributed the 23-13 loss to bad dice, bad drops, and bad maps. That's all.
Looks like this will end up close, go O&H!
1. How did they get such a lead over you guys? Dice? You guys have some players who are away?
Well, when we took the challenge we knew we were in for a battle. Blitz put it best when he said that O&H is better than some may think. They are a very respectable clan that has not played in many challenges yet, but have a bright future. I think the thing that have helped them the most is the addition of so many "random" maps: the agreement was that 28 of the 36 maps would be random. We consider ourselves pretty versatile, but I guess the randomness fell on the wrong maps . It will be a hard challenge to come back and win—we need to win 10 of the final 12 just to tie—but you can bet that it will be a hard fought battle all the way till the end.
2. Any comments on their players or their play?
Danryan has done a good job heading this up for O&H, I believe he organized most of it himself, but also all their players have made very few mistakes. I will admit a lot of the games came down to a couple good turns deciding the outcome of the game, however I do not want to take any credit away from O&H as they have played very strong in each of the games i have been a part of.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users