darkpolan - Ratings abuse [Warned/Busted] ks

by **Bruceswar** on Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:05 am

Accused:

darkpolan

The accused are suspected of:

Other: Ratings abuse

Comments: This one is open and shut case. Looks like he has it mixed up perhaps? thinking 1 is the best and 5 is the worst. Warning should be enough here.

by **king sam** on Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:55 am

whats wrong with his ratings?

He has played 52 people and 30 of them have been worth sub par ratings..looks legit to me.

Warning obviously handed out, multi check pending.. seems fishy..

KS

by **king sam** on Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:06 am

Busted.

by **Army of GOD** on Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:35 am

king sam wrote:Busted.

No one messes with the King.

by **Bruceswar** on Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:45 am

king sam wrote:Busted.

Wow with who?

by **king sam** on Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:49 pm

Bruceswar wrote:Wow with who?

Its our policy to leave that between the offender and the admin. Your welcome to ask him if he returns, but unfortunately I am not at liberty to say.

by **Bruceswar** on Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:32 am

I seen all the other names. I do not see why you would want to hide any cheaters names.

by **king sam** on Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:53 pm

Bruceswar wrote:I seen all the other names. I do not see why you would want to hide any cheaters names.

Yeah the way it goes is if there reported together supposed to be guilty together then we will say that those accounts are multis.

Example Report:
Accused: Player X & Player Y thought to be multis
Verdict: Player X and Player Y have been Busted.

But if there not accused together then we don't divulge this information, or at least are not doing so now and for the future. We fill this is a matter between us and them, and we don't need to smear the user anymore then what the infraction that imposed on them has been. I understand the logic of wanting to know and even informing as many as possible to deter these actions by this user in the future but the gain from this doesn't outweigh the loss of confidentiality that would incur. This is the way it is for now.

KS

by **phantomzero** on Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:06 pm

Interesting. It was only a couple days ago that they were listing the names of the busted.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=106131#p2390370

eye84free wrote:Riot! has been busted with Graphix., Duality., -Suffocation, Mutley., GiggleInDeath, Untutored Youth, Risen.

Eye84free

by **king sam** on Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:33 am

its no change, every once in a while you will see a slip up like this. I did this as well, but it came to my attention that we are not conducting business like this.

So you got a free look at that one.

by **Bruceswar** on Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:51 pm

mutlis ... all of them should be made public for all to see.

by **jefjef** on Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:55 pm

I as a customer appreciates confidentiality of account information. As it should be.

But as far as divulging account names. What is being protected? Nothing. Who does it harm? A cheater? An account names reputation? No conceivable valid reason I can think of.

by **king sam** on Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:14 am

jefjef wrote:I as a customer appreciates confidentiality of account information. As it should be.

But as far as divulging account names. What is being protected? Nothing. Who does it harm? A cheater? An account names reputation? No conceivable valid reason I can think of.

take it up in suggs & bugs, you know this guys

by **rutherfoo** on Sat Jan 23, 2010 3:22 am

king sam wrote:its no change, every once in a while you will see a slip up like this. I did this as well, but it came to my attention that we are not conducting business like this.

So you got a free look at that one.

this one too

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=104601&p=2368119#p2367451