butchiepoo[Busted]

by **alster** on Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:40 pm

Accused:

butchiepoo

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

n/a

Comments:

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:49 pm

Goes straight into premium. Plays British Islands and Classic maps only (1v.1). Looking at his game list and history, it appears that this is a new account of an old player. E.g. see the way he sets up sets of games (e.g. 6249001 – 6249007 British Islands, 6249008 – 6249014 Classic and 6249336 – 6249338 British Islands). No really new player just happens to do that and if knowing that little trick how to start series of games like this, well, he has been here before.

by **alex951** on Sat Jan 09, 2010 9:58 pm

he might have been busted for being a multi in the past and decided to buy premium for one of the accounts so he could continue to play.

i think there was something in C&A about a kid that confessed to having more then one account but was able to continue playing by paying for one of them

by **alster** on Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:56 am

alex951 wrote:he might have been busted for being a multi in the past and decided to buy premium for one of the accounts so he could continue to play.

i think there was something in C&A about a kid that confessed to having more then one account but was able to continue playing by paying for one of them

I assume that you have reviewed his game list and history (and not only throwing out something which is completly useless since the mods will look at this account) - based on that, what exactly what do you base that idea/suggestion on?

by **obliterationX** on Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:31 am

Let's say he's not a multi. Okay, he's bought premium membership not long after registering, which supposedly incriminates him. Since he's not a multi, he won't get busted.

On the other hand, let's say he is a multi. Okay, he's bought premium membership not long after registering, which supposedly incriminates him. Since he's already bought premium for a new account, labeled a "buy back", he won't get busted.

Not to mention, how much intelligence does it take to play a 1 vs 1 game on sequential? I'd be more concerned if they were freestyle, with 1 second moves. So, don't throw accusations around this forum, which you should know would be "cleared" anyway. Shame on you.

/topic

by **alster** on Sun Jan 10, 2010 7:40 am

obliterationX wrote:Let's say he's not a multi. Okay, he's bought premium membership not long after registering, which supposedly incriminates him. Since he's not a multi, he won't get busted.

Wow. He won't get busted if it's not a multiple account. Sherlock, stating the obvious can be really... wait for it... awesome.

obliterationX wrote:On the other hand, let's say he is a multi. Okay, he's bought premium membership not long after registering, which supposedly incriminates him. Since he's already bought premium for a new account, labeled a "buy back", he won't get busted.

Not to mention, how much intelligence does it take to play a 1 vs 1 game on sequential? I'd be more concerned if they were freestyle, with 1 second moves. So, don't throw accusations around this forum, which you should know would be "cleared" anyway. Shame on you.

/topic

It's not a buy back unless he has been busted once and agrees to acquire premium for one of the accounts that previously has been busted (or is allowed, for some reason, to create a new account instead of the ones previously busted). Further more, there's nothing in my comments re skills on 1v.1. Dunno if you are unable to read or unable to comprehend the initial post, dunno also what would be the lesser stupidity.

What concerns me is an account that initially went premium and initially creates a numeric series of games by multiple clicks. It appears obvious that this is a player who has played/created games before. Whether or not the account in practice can be tied to other accounts (and thereby busted as multi), well, it's a practical matter. Instantly buying premium is no excuse for creating a second (third or whatever) account unless this has been cleared by an appropriate mod.

by **eye84free** on Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:02 am

Looking into this at this time.

Eye84free

by **alex951** on Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:05 pm

alstergren wrote:
alex951 wrote:he might have been busted for being a multi in the past and decided to buy premium for one of the accounts so he could continue to play.

i think there was something in C&A about a kid that confessed to having more then one account but was able to continue playing by paying for one of them

I assume that you have reviewed his game list and history (and not only throwing out something which is completly useless since the mods will look at this account) - based on that, what exactly what do you base that idea/suggestion on?

i dont know if you think i'm saying that this kid is the same one that confessed, I'm not. i thought that a user that has been busted for being a multi can come back with the purchase of a premium right? but what i'm not 100% sure on is if they can buy premium for a completely different account so they can start fresh. i'm pretty sure they can as long as their previous accounts are banned i based this on the idea that lacks primary concern is making money

i dont know why you have to be suck a dick i was just giving my 2 cents.

by **alster** on Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:42 am

alex951 wrote:i dont know if you think i'm saying that this kid is the same one that confessed, I'm not. i thought that a user that has been busted for being a multi can come back with the purchase of a premium right? but what i'm not 100% sure on is if they can buy premium for a completely different account so they can start fresh. i'm pretty sure they can as long as their previous accounts are banned i based this on the idea that lacks primary concern is making money

i dont know why you have to be suck a dick i was just giving my 2 cents.

I'm a dick due to the fact that your 2 cents is a useless input. You might as well say, "it may not be a multi, maybe it's his dog's account." Of course it can be a user's dog that has created an account on an idle Tuesday afternoon. But that it's impossible to know. Both for the guy making the original post and the subsequent poster. It’s really tiresome seeing these useless “maybe this and that” posts in the C&A forum. Of course there’re a lot of maybes. But unless one can not actually provide some insight or input based on anything more than wild speculations, it’s a useless post. Here, you obviously didn’t even to bother to check the account’s game history etc. you just blurted out something. And it was useless ´cause neither you nor I have any idea whether or not it’s a previous busted person who purchased premium in order to keep playing. Hell, this may be a brand new account that cannot be traced back to any other accounts. This is something for the multi hunters to check. Speculation doesn’t help anyone.