Accused:
Captain Pooka
GIJOO
The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis;
Conducting Secret Diplomacy; and/or
Dumping Points
Game numbers:
Game 6021860--Captain knocked out Gijoo for the direct win; Gijoo attacked neutral player to weaken himself and leave him prone for Captain's attack
Game 6085609--Gijoo took two terts from me in round one, allowing Captain to take me out in the same round and win the game unchallenged
Game 6132037--Captain knocked out Gijoo for the direct win; Gijoo took two terts from neutral player to leave himself prone for easy attack and Captain wins again
Game 6132038--GIJOO eliminated Captain’s target, giving Captain the immediate win and Gijoo (and others) the loss
Game 6134296--GIJOO again eliminated Captain’s target, giving Captain the immediate win and Gijoo (and others) the loss
Game 6138286--Captain knocked out Gijoo for the direct win; Gijoo attacked neutral player to weaken himself and leave him prone for attack
Comments:
Captain and Gijoo have played in 30 assassin games together. I've played in 2 with them. Of the 30, the games I listed above are the 6 that Captain won under sketchy circumstances. I just finished a game with these guys in which Gijoo eliminated Captain's target to give Captain the instant win in the first round. It was the second time that they had done that in a game where I've played, so that's why I started to look into their games. In essence, here's what I think is happening: they always play these assassin games together, communicate as to their targets, then Gijoo arranges it so that Captain Pooka wins. He does this by either directly taking out Captain's target, or, in cases where gijoo is Captain's target, attacking neutral players so that he's weak and easily overtaken by Captain in the first round. The incidents that I find the most egregious are games 6132038 and 6134296 where Gijoo actually intentionally eliminates Captain's target so that Captain directly wins. I may be wrong, or this may be some new way to play assassin games that I'm unfamiliar with, but I'm simply asking that someone with more experience than myself examine the evidence presented above and see where it goes. Thanks.
-mr91mr
