\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.
Moderator: Community Team
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:27 pm
don't think thats right. we invaded to protect our own country and our own freedom. no one ever learnt about the jews in the british army until we had invaded germany and the red army had liberated some on its way to germany. nothing to do with the jews but i accept your opinion.
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:30 pm
my view is that no one won the war. sure someone lost and was divided but the other countries lost as well. the USSR was made bigger and stronger than ever and the trinny of the soviets was brought across europe. germany was devided. franch was bankrupted, as was britain and the USA had now made its own worst enemy in the people of the USSR. the cold war began and fear ran across the world.
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:31 pm
flashleg8 wrote:Newcastle wrote:don't think thats right. we invaded to protect our own country and our own freedom. no one ever learnt about the jews in the british army until we had invaded germany and the red army had liberated some on its way to germany. nothing to do with the jews but i accept your opinion.
Regardless of whether it was intentional or not - the by-product was that the genocide was stopped. Which in retrospect made the war justified.
if anything i say that the soviets were the ones that stopped most of the genocide.
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:31 pm
who else said victory?
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:34 pm
thats the one!
sorry no good at speeling but my thoughtss is good.
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by hourman on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:34 pm
i said victory but no one has said ne thing about the pacific sid eof teh war if japan would of beat us in the pacific teh world would be different
-
hourman
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:30 pm
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:35 pm
who else has voted on this thing?
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:36 pm
hourman wrote:i said victory but no one has said ne thing about the pacific sid eof teh war if japan would of beat us in the pacific teh world would be different
yeah. the USA would be speaking japanise for one thing and Japan would have jained control over the nukes of the US. good call.
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by hourman on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:38 pm
but since we seen the midway thing it changed the war in the pacific for us and probably the most sufficient batlle of all in the pacific i mean come on 4 carriers vs. 2 beat up carrier and 1 good one and we still win. OVERKILL
-
hourman
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:30 pm
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:40 pm
i'm sorry, i just wanted to do a ww2 poll so that i could express my views on ww2.
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:41 pm
and for all those people who say that we won i say this,
Dulcet et decorum est ore patria mori
because it sounds like you agree with it.
Last edited by
Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by flashleg8 on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:41 pm
Newcastle wrote:hourman wrote:i said victory but no one has said ne thing about the pacific sid eof teh war if japan would of beat us in the pacific teh world would be different
yeah. the USA would be speaking japanise for one thing and Japan would have jained control over the nukes of the US. good call.
Doubtful. Japans goal was not an invasion of the USA, they wanted control of China - Japan attacked the US after the oil embargo which forced them to annex the South East Asian colonies to secure resources. The islands in the Pacific where taken as a defensive measure to stop the US fleet from threatening this expansion.
-
flashleg8
-
- Posts: 1026
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:21 am
- Location: the Union of Soviet Socialist Scotland
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:44 pm
you're right to some extent but not all. conquerers have never been happy with their initial goals for conquering. they will always want more. and if japan had beaten the US navy they would have not only engulfed Asia but also the US. good point though.
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
by Newcastle on Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:46 pm
damn typing! yes i do. but it was used by the british as,
"it is a glorius and noble thing to die for one's country"
booyaka, booyaka 619!
-
Newcastle
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: NI!
Return to Out, out, brief candle!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: jonesthecurl, mookiemcgee