insatiable[cleared]

by **colton24** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:09 pm

Accused:

insatiable

The accused are suspected of:

Other: Offensive game chat with bigotry/flaming/baiting

Game number(s):

Game 5628951

Comments: Blue decides to go off on his marry little self with this:

2009-10-02 08:27:22 - insatiable: good riddance Colton24 & learn how to play before writing SHIT in the forum
2009-10-02 10:58:28 - insatiable: colton24 don't have anything concrete to add, so he pasted a "You're FULL OF SHIT" pic in the C&A forum
2009-10-02 11:00:47 - insatiable: now colton24 is "spamming the wall of kotaro while he's forum banned, kind of a childish prick move

by **mpjh** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:12 pm

You sure you don't want to reconsider this, colton24?

by **colton24** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:13 pm

mpjh wrote:You sure you don't want to reconsider this, colton24?

I almost didn't post this until I looked up "prick"

by **mpjh** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:15 pm

Next time, don't look the word up, ignorance is bliss.

by **the.killing.44** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:20 pm

Prick really isn't that bad of a word. And it's nowhere close to being bigoted. This will be a foe and move on instance.

by **colton24** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:21 pm

the.killing.44 wrote:Prick really isn't that bad of a word. And it's nowhere close to being bigoted. This will be a foe and move on instance.

Depends on which instance he uses it in.

by **AAFitz** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:23 pm

mpjh wrote:You sure you don't want to reconsider this, colton24?

Seriously colton...and all I can do is say trust me, when I say this is not a flame.

From here on out, before you post anything, ask yourself this question.. Mpjh has given you a gem of advice here. It would be a shame if you didnt see it for what it is.

Also, Ive seen some of your game chats. Do you want yours to be judged the same way?

colton24 wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:Prick really isn't that bad of a word. And it's nowhere close to being bigoted. This will be a foe and move on instance.

Depends on which instance he uses it in.

In this instance it is absolutely clear the context and its meaning and absolute absence of bigotry of any kind. I also think its obvious you know this already.

by **colton24** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:24 pm

AAFitz wrote:
mpjh wrote:You sure you don't want to reconsider this, colton24?

Seriously colton...and all I can do is say trust me, when I say this is not a flame.

From here on out, before you post anything, ask yourself this question.. Mpjh has given you a gem of advice here. It would be a shame if you didnt see it for what it is.

Also, Ive seen some of your game chats. Do you want yours to be judged the same way?

Eh?

by **mpjh** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:24 pm

Truthfully, colton, this isn't worth it. Just be happy he doesn't have a better vocabulary. I would shut this down and move on.

by **the.killing.44** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:33 pm

mpjh wrote:Truthfully, colton, this isn't worth it. Just be happy he doesn't have a better vocabulary. I would shut this down and move on.

Colton, I'm agreeing with mpjh. It must be true.

by **jefjef** on Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:11 pm

the.killing.44 wrote:
mpjh wrote:Truthfully, colton, this isn't worth it. Just be happy he doesn't have a better vocabulary. I would shut this down and move on.

Colton, I'm agreeing with mpjh. It must be true.

Yep. the colt**.44 is right. Just FOE it.