I've looked at the games, and Darthvadar's reactions are commonplace. Some of the players were being wankers anyway.
Just look through his ratings left on page 1: (let's say, after seeing the 1st pages, roughly 70% are 5 stars, 1 stars can be about 10% and in between maybe 20%). Now actually look further than that, and one can see nearly 95% 5-star ratings. This isn't abuse, this is better than normal--Darthvadar's a good guy when it comes to leaving ratings. As for his negative ratings? Completely commonplace; they're based on his opinion and most likely done in defense to a incoming 1-star rating from his opponent (I bet you we'll see that from hahaha and Darthvadar's ratings for one another). Darthvadar's ratings are not abusive. We've seen people before being abusive with ratings, and Darthvadar can hardly even be considered to be even remotely similar to them.
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=Legiohttp://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=CHAVEZ81http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=JaMarcusThose three are definite ratings abusers, and when properly compared to Darthvadar's Ratings Left are drastically different.
Also, judging from this particular past game chat between hahahaha and Darthvadar, one can easily see what the main motive is for hahaha's poorly founded accusation. [
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=5766646This accusation is poorly grounded, highly subjective, and was fueled by a complete lack of clearheadedness on hahaha's part. There's no evidence which indicates that Darthvadar abusively rates people. In fact, given Darthvadar's history of Ratings Left, he is in fact a Benevolent Player Rater.