specialconqueror [Busted]

by **jammyjames** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:45 am

Accused:

specialconqueror

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

Game 5669471
Game 5674006
Game 5669475
And every other game he has played

Comments:

Just started playing conquer club, played 7 won 4 - 57%

however every game he has played he has started, and they all seem to be fuedal and freestyle, the second game he is against KuGelFang, and he has taken over rhu village and is sitting on it. for someone with such little experience this is not a game tactic known. i couldnt tell you whom they are a multi with, just someone on the site that clearly knows their way around fuedal. would be seriously in depth but maybe an ip check against the top rated fuedal players would concise whom.

by **Masli** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:52 am

It was a suprise to me that darth didn't make this post in the 1st Game 5669471
2009-09-29 16:14:26 - Darthvadar: multi :-)

by **Darthvadar** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:35 am

Masli wrote:It was a suprise to me that darth didn't make this post in the 1st Game 5669471
2009-09-29 16:14:26 - Darthvadar: multi

Well i would of done, however i got a warning last time i reported some1 for being a Multi. Not providing enough evidence apparently. So i didnt bother. How much evidence does 1 need before we should report them. I would have to agree with jammy though

by **jammyjames** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:28 am

it's a clear cut case. i dont think its really possible that its not

by **DJPatrick** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:49 am

Absolutely..must be a multi...
How sad that a Captain with two and a half thousand games cannot join a contest with a player with only two games under their belt and be beaten by subterfuge and someone with (hidden) experience...takes away all sense of fair play...Shame...

by **owenshooter** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:14 pm

DJPatrick wrote:Absolutely..must be a multi...
How sad that a Captain with two and a half thousand games cannot join a contest with a player with only two games under their belt and be beaten by subterfuge and someone with (hidden) experience...takes away all sense of fair play...Shame...

i was just about to point this out... the good news is, maybe someone will learn their lesson, because you don't get the points back even if they are busted...-0

p.s.-and those maps are not hard to play, especially 1v1... you can learn the strategy one time out against a good opponent, and be able to compete with anyone by your second match... not hard maps at all, very boring strategy..

by **darkangelsguy205** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:05 pm

this is a multi he cant be that good he cant know that much about feudal without playing alot of games there and how does he know about the conqouer

by **alster** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:12 pm

owenshooter wrote:
DJPatrick wrote:Absolutely..must be a multi...
How sad that a Captain with two and a half thousand games cannot join a contest with a player with only two games under their belt and be beaten by subterfuge and someone with (hidden) experience...takes away all sense of fair play...Shame...

i was just about to point this out... the good news is, maybe someone will learn their lesson, because you don't get the points back even if they are busted...-0

p.s.-and those maps are not hard to play, especially 1v1... you can learn the strategy one time out against a good opponent, and be able to compete with anyone by your second match... not hard maps at all, very boring strategy..

Mmmm.. Yeah. But generally I think that any experienced player is aware of the "multi risk" so to speak if entering a game against an account with few games played. And I rarely see any experienced players whine about this. But that doesn't mean one shouldn't report it (reporting does not equal whining). I've reported one or two multi accounts myself. I don't do it for the points or for the sake of whining, but rather in order to keep the business model going. Long-term, if not busting multis, the price of premium will go up. All about the wallet (or credit card I guess), very little to do with moral and shit like that. The sensible economic man supports Ron Paul.

by **TheForgivenOne** on Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:12 pm

jammyjames wrote:Accused:

specialconquerer

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

Game 5669471
Game 5674006
Game 5669475
And every other game he has played

Comments:

Just started playing conquer club, played 7 won 4 - 57%

however every game he has played he has started, and they all seem to be fuedal and freestyle, the second game he is against KuGelFang, and he has taken over rhu village and is sitting on it. for someone with such little experience this is not a game tactic known. i couldnt tell you whom they are a multi with, just someone on the site that clearly knows their way around fuedal. would be seriously in depth but maybe an ip check against the top rated fuedal players would concise whom.

fixed the link to the player

by **DJPatrick** on Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:04 am

Wow..maybe taken out of context.. I never used the word whining nor snivelling nor psychopanatic...I clearlty stated that I support JJ's complaint that some multi set a trap for a highly-ranked player with two and a half thousand games vy pretending to be a newbie with two games trying to have a fair game...shame on that player...

by **king sam** on Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:27 pm

This is being looked into at this time. marking pending.

Darthvadar wrote:Well i would of done, however i got a warning last time i reported some1 for being a Multi. Not providing enough evidence apparently. So i didnt bother. How much evidence does 1 need before we should report them. I would have to agree with jammy though

And we encourage everyone to make a claim about someone in violation of the rules, all we ask is that more evidence is provided then "smells like a multi" or "moves to fast to be new".. etc, etc....

This is due in part to separate the cases that have a legitimate complaint and the ones that are created out of vengeance of being beat by a new recruit. If you feel that you cant provide an accurate response in the comments section to explain why you feel the player you are accusing is in violation of the rules then you are more then welcome to submit an E-Ticket or not submit a claim at all as darth chose in this case.

However the evidence provided in this case was sufficient, and this is being looked into.

Thanks,
King Sam