Multi - wooddruff and fluffypit [cleared]

by **jgazaille** on Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:43 pm

Accused:

wooddruff and fluffypit

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

Game 5592090

Comments: While I know 3 player games usually end up with two people teaming up against the third, this game was ridiculous. The final straw was when fluffypit was going to wipe out wooddruff, he brought him down to 1 territory, and then waited for almost 30 seconds...it was a 12v1. My best bet is he switched to wooddruff to deploy and then came back to fluffy to finish the game. Wooddruff also did most of the task of wiping me out and then allowed fluffy to essentially run over him and get the easy win. Even when it was clear who was going to win, Wooddruff still came after me instead of trying to get back in the game by taking on fluffy.

by **jefjef** on Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:51 pm

wooddruff sure sounds familiar... Where have I heard that name? I'll get back to ya.

This move happened in 19 seconds of each other. I dunno.

9-09-14 20:34:49 - fluffypit assaulted Devon from Dorset and conquered it from Wooddruff
2009-09-14 20:35:08 - Wooddruff deployed 5 troops on Corn

by **Strife** on Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:59 pm

C-c-c-c-cleared... Check the country flags, both prem, be sure before you accuse(Proxy is highly unlikely). Woodruff and Wooddruff is odd though, probably coinkidink.

by **Shabel** on Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:14 pm

woodruff is a cheat...i foed him long ago. Problem is... now one can catch him.

by **jefjef** on Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:16 pm

Shabel wrote:woodruff is a cheat...i foed him long ago. Problem is... now one can catch him.

woodruff or wooddruff?

by **jgazaille** on Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:50 pm

I posted due to what I saw...I didn't think of looking at the flags. So even if they are not multi's, then maybe a secret alliance?

by **Strife** on Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:53 pm

jgazaille wrote:I posted due to what I saw...I didn't think of looking at the flags. So even if they are not multi's, then maybe a secret alliance?

It's possible for both still, they could have used a proxy to hide the I.P. for multism.

by **slowreactor** on Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:53 pm

wooddruff's the definite multi. If you've been here long enough, you will know the original. Dunno about the other guy though.

by **Bruceswar** on Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:48 am

slowreactor wrote:wooddruff's the definite multi. If you've been here long enough, you will know the original. Dunno about the other guy though.

I thought that might have been the case also... but this account is from 2007... It would have been busted by now.

Edited to add....

Username:
Wooddruff
Rank:
Private 1st Class Private 1st Class
Score:
1099
Games:
4744 completed, 1884 (40%) won | Find all games with Wooddruff
Attendance:
99% of turns taken

Joined:
Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:46 am

Username:
Woodruff
Rank:
Cadet Cadet
Score:
881
Games:
1769 completed, 436 (25%) won | Find all games with Woodruff
Attendance:
99% of turns taken

Joined:
Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Highly unlikely these 2 are multis.

by **BoganGod** on Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:16 pm

sore loser syndrome in the cheating and abuse section once again. Why am I not suprised.

by **jgazaille** on Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:23 pm

it isn't the fact that I lost...it's how I lost. Even when fluffypit was clearly making a move, Wooddruff still decided to attack me, and then did nothing as Fluffypit ran through him racking up bonuses. Even though there was a spot it was 5 v 1, he decided it best not to break the bonus before fluffypit fortified them. And the whole waiting to deploy thing before the last turn seemed VERY fishy to me.