Moderator: Cartographers
Evil DIMwit wrote:What a shame. I liked the idea behind this map. I'd never have the patience to play it, but I liked the idea.
It died because people did not like the "no Theme" idea.killerpit4e wrote:Evil DIMwit wrote:What a shame. I liked the idea behind this map. I'd never have the patience to play it, but I liked the idea.
you would have to speak to WM as he was the one doing the grafis
WidowMakers wrote:
Its theme was TONS OF TERRITORIES.
I will start it up again if there are people who want a map with large numbers of territories with standard GP but no story/theme but good luck finding them.
WM
Evil DIMwit wrote:WidowMakers wrote:
Its theme was TONS OF TERRITORIES.
I will start it up again if there are people who want a map with large numbers of territories with standard GP but no story/theme but good luck finding them.
WM
I am absolutely confident that there will be plenty of people willing to play this map if it's released to the general CC population.
WidowMakers wrote:Evil DIMwit wrote:WidowMakers wrote:
Its theme was TONS OF TERRITORIES.
I will start it up again if there are people who want a map with large numbers of territories with standard GP but no story/theme but good luck finding them.
WM
I am absolutely confident that there will be plenty of people willing to play this map if it's released to the general CC population.
Well if you can figure a way to get people into here and support it, i will finish it. But the initial response was less than enthusiastic towards a non-themed map.
I am all ears for any ideas you might have as to get support. Plus the thing is, the map is almost done. All that is needed is a bit of border discussion and an agreement on the bonuses. Then the HUGE XML project.
WM
No killer, you would get to do teh XML. I am not worried about that. All i am saying is that there needs to be people who want this map. 4 or 5 is not good enough for me.killerpit4e wrote:
me and Evil DIMwit could do the xml and you could do the grx
The territory bonus is capped at 10 (see teh legend)HighlanderAttack wrote:I would play it for sure.
I think it is a map that would not be good for 1v1 because whoever went first would win.
I think the bonus structure may be too high, as first turn players are likely to get bonuses and break second player bonuses. (I would do bonuses 1-2-3-4-5 instead of the 3-6-9-12-15.
Just my thought. Good Luck
Users browsing this forum: No registered users