Moderator: Clan Directors
jpcloet wrote:Is this FINAL?
jpcloet wrote:Just seems odd that it takes almost a month to decide on whether there will be a tie-breaker and what it will look like.
jpcloet wrote:Yes, this was a tie, I think the 2nd in clan history.
sjnap wrote:My opinion is every challenge needs a winner !
Bruceswar wrote:well sigh... I see baldadonis agree's to a battle, then runs off to who knows where and things go into shambles.... We shall meet again.. GG all
amazzony wrote:sjnap wrote:My opinion is every challenge needs a winner !
This is your opinion but it doesn't mean that everybody has to agree with you. I do not want to argue about it but just take your lesson from it - if you don't wish ties then make sure that you set up your challenges according to that. It was decided to be a 30 game challenge and so it was.Bruceswar wrote:well sigh... I see baldadonis agree's to a battle, then runs off to who knows where and things go into shambles.... We shall meet again.. GG all
He did not run off, he had very good reasons for leaving so suddenly. Nothing went into shambles, challenges ended and that was it. Hopefully we do meet again!
amazzony wrote:sjnap wrote:My opinion is every challenge needs a winner !
This is your opinion but it doesn't mean that everybody has to agree with you. I do not want to argue about it but just take your lesson from it - if you don't wish ties then make sure that you set up your challenges according to that. It was decided to be a 30 game challenge and so it was.Bruceswar wrote:well sigh... I see baldadonis agree's to a battle, then runs off to who knows where and things go into shambles.... We shall meet again.. GG all
He did not run off, he had very good reasons for leaving so suddenly. Nothing went into shambles, challenges ended and that was it. Hopefully we do meet again!
sjnap wrote:Huh ..was I talking to you ???
Never seen a tie in wars in the history
prismsaber wrote:Yes you are right, the challenge itself was poorly constructed, there always needs to be a tiebreaker written in. That said (and I don't mean to sound arrogant), you guys tied us via several in-game flukes and you know it, and when push came to shove you flat out refuse a tiebreaker because you knew you wouldn't win. You were scared.
sjnap wrote:amazzony wrote:sjnap wrote:My opinion is every challenge needs a winner !
This is your opinion but it doesn't mean that everybody has to agree with you. I do not want to argue about it but just take your lesson from it - if you don't wish ties then make sure that you set up your challenges according to that. It was decided to be a 30 game challenge and so it was.Bruceswar wrote:well sigh... I see baldadonis agree's to a battle, then runs off to who knows where and things go into shambles.... We shall meet again.. GG all
He did not run off, he had very good reasons for leaving so suddenly. Nothing went into shambles, challenges ended and that was it. Hopefully we do meet again!
Huh ..was I talking to you ???
Never seen a tie in wars in the history
Blitzaholic wrote:does this end in a tie 15-15? why not play 10 more games for 40 so it counts?
Blitzaholic wrote:does this end in a tie 15-15? why not play 10 more games for 40 so it counts?
Blitzaholic wrote:does this end in a tie 15-15? why not play 10 more games for 40 so it counts?
khazalid wrote:no. what happened to him? my interest has been piqued
Users browsing this forum: No registered users