by Paulus on Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:19 pm
1. Albro's Response - "There is no rule stating this, true. There should be
however. My problem was that you never made any mention of a
relationship untill after i was out of the game. Just your luck, i
checked the game again."
Paulus - It does not matter whether you "think" there should be a rule about this. What matters is that there is NO rule that states that two or more people in game who have family relations should announce this at the start of a game, or at any point for that matter. Therefore, you cannot use this point to support your claim of cheating against me and my uncle. This point of yours in INVALID. You cannot hold others accountable for a rule that does not exist except in your own personal world.
2. Albro's Response - "Just like a multi to say 'ya can't prove it'. Well
it's not my job to prove it. I posted here bc you are a suspected multi
which I'm pretty sure is what this thread is for, isn't it......"
Paulus - Well, maybe you don't personally have to prove that I am guilty before making an accusation, but I still have to be proven guilty by someone, whether it is a moderator or another member of the site. If a person did not have to be proven guilty, people like yourself would be able to throw out false accusations all over the place whenever they wanted to without any evidence or solid argument to back up their claim.
3. Albro's response - I accused you of cheating after i was eliminated,
true. Hmmmmmmmm......but there is also the fact that You did not refer
to him as your uncle till this point. Funny you waited till i was
eliminated to talk to b.k.barunt in a familiar way. Why didn't you call
him your uncle or vice versa at the beginning. Guess you forgot eh,
yeah that must be it, silly twat!"
Paulus - So what if I didn't refer to him as my uncle, or vice-verse, until after the game. It is irrelevant to the game, Albro. I did not feel any need to let everyone know that he was my uncle because it does not matter and because there is absolutely nothing in the rule that requires for anyone to do so. Stop trying to hold me accountable for your personal rule that does not exist anywhere in the site rules, Albro.
4. Albro's Response - "I give myself no more credit than i deserve. I have been as high as # 56 in the placements and i have also lost my share of games and made plenty of mistakes. I don't remember saying it was my skill that made the game last. What does that have to do with the issue
at hand anyway. If the game had gone quicker you two would be ganging
me more often and i would have exposed your dirty little secret
earlier."
Paulus - Apparently you are giving yourself more credit than you deserve by claiming that you lost because you think me and b.k. barunt cheated. What made the game last was the skill of those involved in the game itself. If we had cheated, the game would have ended for you much sooner than it did. Bt, of course, we did not cheat and so it lasted longer.
5. Albro's Response - "I feel more and more like i'm talking to a defense
lawyer, or a politician. Like i said this forum is for 'suspected'
multi's. As far as the feedback is concerned, i'm not taking it off so
other's have no idea what is going on. If you are found innocent then i
will remove the feedback."
Paulus - If this forum is for those suspected of being multis or having cheated, then it must mean that you simply "suspect" us of cheating. Of course, you obviously believe with all certainty that we cheated or else you wouldn't have said this in a separate game chat(130414):
"007-02-05 17:28:08 - AlbroShlo: not this game. another world game where i caught Paulus cheating and reported him. Needless to say Paulus won that game with help from b.k.barunt. Game # 136318 was my game with them. Lookat game history for the two of them and you'll see what i mean
2007-02-05 17:29:54 - AlbroShlo: Not doing so well in this one eh Paulus. Guess you can't win unless you have help. lmao"
You sound quite convinced of our guilt, Albro. Also, you could have posted your issue with us here to let people know what is going on without leaving negative feedback. It is redundant and completely unnecessary.
* Your argument against us is extremely weak, Albro, because you try to support it wityh invalid points that prove nothing in the way of cheating. Why couldn't you have said "good game" at the end of the game in question instead of resorting to this? You are very immature, Albro, and you need to grow up and accept your loss in that game like a man instead of claiming that your loss was a result of cheating, which it was not.