Moderator: Cartographers
Night Strike wrote:Did you forget a couple of D army circles and a few others? If you want the stations to share the army circle, perhaps put the letters on each side of the circle rather than top/bottom. The top one looks empty with the top/bottom approach.
Night Strike wrote:I don't know if having the letter identifications between each army circle is going to work on the hubs because I can see some major colorblind issues with it.
i'll fix.H and K lines have too similar of a color to stay together both in the hub and coming out of it.
MrBenn wrote:...
I'd rather see some of the other stuff make it
barterer2002 wrote:Much clearer cairns, thanks. I still think that H and K lines look almost identical in color and would prefer one of them to be a different color but with the clearer station markings I can certainly figure out what is what.Colour changed next version to a brownI think I would disagree with those who want to change the coloring substantially in the backgrounds. The tradition of the rail series has been the starker backgrounds. Each of the other three are solid grey/black/brown type maps. I much prefer this background to the one in Australia which I find a little difficult to read (I'm not suggesting to do anything with that one-just comparing the two) and I find this grey to be easier on the eyes that Europe also.
Night Strike wrote: Putting pyramids on the map would also be nice.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
captainwalrus wrote:The viper (J) is marked as I in a few places.
gimil wrote:Just a small thought cairns.
Why not colour code the part of the legends that decodes territory names with the example you give? Sort of like this:
Obviously better colour it than I did but you get the idea.
Oh, and your image is a few px to big
melech14 wrote:this looks like a great map. nice bright/highly contrasting colors - and the black rails - and the white background on territory markers make this easier to read.
if the white territory markers were a bit larger than the number text, then it would be even better.
any idea when this map will be done?
captainwalrus wrote:What are the carriages? Nairobi looks just like all the other stations. I like this muchy more than when it started.
DJ Teflon wrote:Nice map so far - would have preferred an ancient river niger civilisation map though - maybe a project somebody might take up another time.
SultanOfSurreal wrote:while I like the thinner rail lines, I think you misconstrued what I was getting at. The slats themselves (the colored portions) are too thick compared to the black portions. There should be a few more of them and they should be thinner.
http://lh5.google.com/pjczech/Rvf0Wg2z1 ... aucus1.jpg
http://www.panoramio.com/photos/original/9629.jpg
now that I think about it they may also look better if they stuck out a tiny bit past the black sections. And maybe you could go whole hog and add little metal rails to either side (the actual "rail" part of the railroad)
and if i may ask, why did you choose Rabak as one of the main hubs? it's not a very large or influential city. cairo or nairboi would make more sense.
cairnswk wrote:SultanOfSurreal wrote:while I like the thinner rail lines, I think you misconstrued what I was getting at. The slats themselves (the colored portions) are too thick compared to the black portions. There should be a few more of them and they should be thinner.
http://lh5.google.com/pjczech/Rvf0Wg2z1 ... aucus1.jpg
http://www.panoramio.com/photos/original/9629.jpg
Sultan, i can only view one of these images to understand what you are getting at. The last one comes up Forbidden 403
An Indian railway stations has no relevance for this map, but i will keep it in mind for the Aisa rail map when i do that later.
SultanOfSurreal wrote:if you're trying to make the connections look like rail lines then you should make the colored portions (which I assume represent the wooden portion of the railroad) thinner and closer together.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users