Agent Price and lucyjack [cleared]

by **jangler3** on Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:39 pm

Accused:

Agent Price
lucyjack

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

5040622

Comments:
Agent Price and I had a nice conversation about playing in fog, And I think he/she took it too personal. But in the convo. I said That I think missing a turn to gain an advantage is cheating. And AP said his/her missing a turn could not be helped. And I understand that. But AP did not miss a turn, lucyjack did. Then looking back at the game log I noticed they hardy attacked each other. I think twice in a 14 round game. I didn't really think anything about this until his/her comment on the missing a turn.

Please check this out, thanks.
J3

by **Agent Price** on Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:44 pm

I haven't attacked yellow because he has a TON of troops on czech republic. I have no idea why lucyjack wasn't attacking me (lord knows I was open), but whatever. I chocked it up to my good fortune or her/his strategy that I didn't understand.

As I explained in the game log:
2009-06-24 22:34:44 - Agent Price: okay, look, we were going back and forth saying "I think" "I think"
2009-06-24 22:34:57 - Agent Price: i missed a turn in one of my games, i know
2009-06-24 22:35:09 - Agent Price: i didn't bother to check the log as to which game
2009-06-24 22:35:30 - Agent Price: i did, in fact, feel guilty about missing a turn, because i wasted everyone's time in that game

I'm not sure how I defend myself, because you can't prove a negative. I just hope there's some way to discover that lucyjack is, indeed, in chicago, and I'm in Los Angeles.

by **Agent Price** on Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:08 pm

The game I missed, by the way, was Game 5101082.

by **king achilles** on Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:21 am

Cleared of being multis with one another. As for a secret diplomacy, being that it's a fog-of-war type and their first game played together so far, we leave it up to you to judge if you feel they have one in this game.

by **lucyjack** on Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:30 am

If you really look over the log, you can see that i attacked jangler (the accuser) a few times and AP (the acussed) a few times. Also, I think AP attacked me more that Jangler did. My adversaires happened to lie in other areas and I was more interested in building troops along the borders that AP and Jangler shared with me. And up until the last turn where I cashed in my cards, I personally wouldnt call approximately 2:3 ratio of armies an open shot.

As for me missing a turn, sorry to add to the confusion. I was in Green Bay for my nephew's graduation.

Funny, I was reading the chat log and tended to agree more with Jangler about fog of war and not reporting where others are located. And then from out of the blue I was accused of being pink!!

Thanks for being there overseers.

Lucy