Moderator: Cartographers
oaktown wrote:Marvaddin wrote:Wont you even try a battle image for background??
send me one a good one and I'll drop it in there.
KEYOGI wrote:I understand the reasons for getting rid of the centre circle, but is it really that bad of an idea to keep it? Would adding more circles to the middle help, making it more like a proper Chinese Checkers board?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
oaktown wrote:
OK, I'm quite satisfied with this latest image. Here's what's new:
• center six territories have been brought in toward each other to better emphasize that they can all attack each other... I think that between the legend and the new placement this should be quite clear. I played with other configurations, but i think this is the cleanest.
• lightened the attack lines between spaces in the red and purple triangles... I can do the same in blue and/or red if those of you with better color vision than I feel it's needed.
edit - lightened blue and red lines, darkened orange lines since enigma's post, below.
• very subtle shadow behind the board, as suggested.
• darkened the letters in orange, as suggested.
Marv, I checked out the site you suggested, and decided that I really like the juxtaposition of the peaceful Chinese landscape over a game of war strategy. In addition, I suspect the images at that site are not public domain.
I'll continue to take suggestions, but I'd like to think that major concerns have been addressed. If that is the case, I will redo the small version incorporating the latest changes, update the XML to reflect changes in territory names, and plot the territory coordinates.[/b]
Gilligan wrote:When you say center 6 can attack, does that mean any one can attack any one?
AndyDufresne wrote:Regarding Guiscard, I agree that it may seem like they only connect across from one another. Perhaps...
Something like that would get the point across easily I think.
Regarding a few other things, perhaps look into darker lines in the blue triangle, as they are almost too light. Maybe keep looking for a good tone that works in all, or two moderately different tones to use in the continents.
Also, the triangles touch corner, but aren't borders. I think people will understand they aren't borders, but might just extend the central zone slightly in between all triangles to give them a buffer zone.
--Andy
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
AndyDufresne wrote:perhaps look into darker lines in the blue triangle, as they are almost too light. Maybe keep looking for a good tone that works in all, or two moderately different tones to use in the continents.
AndyDufresne wrote:Also, the triangles touch corner, but aren't borders. I think people will understand they aren't borders, but might just extend the central zone slightly in between all triangles to give them a buffer zone.
oaktown wrote:
What's new:
- Hollow center circle. I think it works.
- Letters in center, yellow, and orange are dark grey, not black.
- Lighter attack lines in orange.
- Minor adjustments to some letter locations.AndyDufresne wrote:perhaps look into darker lines in the blue triangle, as they are almost too light. Maybe keep looking for a good tone that works in all, or two moderately different tones to use in the continents.
When you say too light, you mean they're hard to read, or wrong artistically? I started with the same grey as the center, but they were unrecognizable against the blue. Any darker they're too heavy. I'd have to go lighter to make them more visible.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users