Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
wondful25 wrote:of course, sjnap is not point dumping
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
He does when he's playing games he's never played before. The guy just wants to play regular games like anyone else. It's not his fault he's no good at them. Have a look at the games: he's not trying to lose, he just makes a lot of bad moves. Chalk it up to lack of experience in anything but team games against weak teams.wondful25 wrote:A player with a 75% win rate does not lose eight of nine 1v1 games.
BaldAdonis wrote:He does when he's playing games he's never played before. The guy just wants to play regular games like anyone else. It's not his fault he's no good at them. Have a look at the games: he's not trying to lose, he just makes a lot of bad moves. Chalk it up to lack of experience in anything but team games against weak teams.wondful25 wrote:A player with a 75% win rate does not lose eight of nine 1v1 games.
comic boy wrote:BaldAdonis wrote:He does when he's playing games he's never played before. The guy just wants to play regular games like anyone else. It's not his fault he's no good at them. Have a look at the games: he's not trying to lose, he just makes a lot of bad moves. Chalk it up to lack of experience in anything but team games against weak teams.wondful25 wrote:A player with a 75% win rate does not lose eight of nine 1v1 games.
Actually at one time he was a first rate escalating player but then stopped because he got obsessed with being Conqueror.....its a shame and I miss playing him.
prismsaber wrote:He wants to play normal games now you silly corporal. It's not point dumping, it's 1v1, which is completely luck based. I've swept strong opponents before in 1v1 and also lost 6 of 7 to a striper before. Doesn't mean squat.
OP only complained about 75%, and 80% is certainly attainable. Observe many players' Waterloo matches. It wouldn't be attainable if everyone played perfectly, but they don't. You can always massacre public players, but usually people who care enough about playing fairly (and hence playing sequential) don't bother with that. Leave the farming to the "conqueror".Bruceswar wrote:Anybody who plays lots of 1 vs 1 games will tell you to win 80% of the time is impossible for anybody when playing SEQ.
No game is completely luck based - even those St. Pat's games.prismsaber wrote:It's 1v1, which is completely luck based. I've swept strong opponents before in 1v1 and also lost 6 of 7 to a striper before. Doesn't mean squat.
sjnap wrote:If I gain points ppl calling me a cheater
If I lose points ppl calling me a cheater
I am confused
sailorseal wrote:My big boy banana was out the whole time
AndyDufresne wrote:Forever linked at the hip's-banana! (That sounds strange, don't quote me.)AndyDufresne wrote:Many Happy Bananas to everyone, lets party...with Bananas.
--Andy
LED ZEPPELINER wrote:why would he want to dump points. he at the moment is the second highest ranked player on Conquer CLub????
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
Joodoo wrote:LED ZEPPELINER wrote:why would he want to dump points. he at the moment is the second highest ranked player on Conquer CLub????
I think that usually, a player dumps points because he's(I don't think any female player has done this before) pissed off at how this site is ran. They're pissed at the mods and admins, and the only way they can express their frustration is by deadbeating every game that they're in.
Obviously, this is not the case for sjnap.
sjnap wrote:If I gain points ppl calling me a cheater
If I lose points ppl calling me a cheater
I am confused
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I know I stated this in another thread, it gets boring at the top. Only playing certain types because you dont want to lose points. Its alot more fun to just play what you like.
wondful25 wrote:prismsaber wrote:He wants to play normal games now you silly corporal. It's not point dumping, it's 1v1, which is completely luck based. I've swept strong opponents before in 1v1 and also lost 6 of 7 to a striper before. Doesn't mean squat.
Prismsaber, what's with your obsession with rank? I am a "silly little corporal"? From what you've written above you should realize that Risk is largely dependent, at times, upon a ubiquitous factor: RISK. You've lost to stripers and I've beat majors. After 53 games you were at 26-27. I am at 25-28, don't look down upon me and call me silly. AS you've already proven, rank has nothing to do with skill level.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users