Conquer Club

Caffeine

Have an idea for a map? Discuss ideas and concepts here.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Caffeine

Postby Zajnet on Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:51 pm

So I was bored in Chemistry class the other day, and got to thinking about Conquer Club.. (seriously)

This is a quick mock-up I did in Photoshop of a Caffeine molecule:
Click image to enlarge.
image


I was thinking that each atom (C, N, O, or H) would be a territory, and bonuses would be something like this:
All 5 atoms in left ring: +4
All 6 atoms in right ring: +7
Any pair of double-bonded atoms: +1
Each CH3 branch: +2
All 4 Ns: +3
Both Os: +1

What do you guys think?
Cook Zajnet
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 3:18 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby shakeycat on Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:29 pm

23 territories is awful small. It may work better on a larger molecule, or more than one.
Current Map Project: Tokyo
User avatar
Lieutenant shakeycat
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:13 am
Location: Vancouver

Re: Caffeine

Postby sully800 on Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:30 pm

I don't really see any thrill or purpose to playing a war game on a molecule. For this to be interesting it would need to incorporate some very unique (and sensible) game play.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Re: Caffeine

Postby oaktown on Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:58 pm

sully800 wrote:I don't really see any thrill or purpose to playing a war game on a molecule. For this to be interesting it would need to incorporate some very unique (and sensible) game play.

... and look friggin' awesome.
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: Caffeine

Postby sailorseal on Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:44 am

oaktown wrote:
sully800 wrote:I don't really see any thrill or purpose to playing a war game on a molecule. For this to be interesting it would need to incorporate some very unique (and sensible) game play.

... and look friggin' awesome.

I think that is all there is to say if you can fix these, good for you :D but if you can't this gets to go in the pile.
Good Luck!
User avatar
Cook sailorseal
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: conquerclub.com

Re: Caffeine

Postby MeDeFe on Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:46 am

I like it (and coffee, too), the graphics need improvement, but I really like the general idea.

As for "awfully small", why did Doodle Earth get quenched then?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Caffeine

Postby AndyDufresne on Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:51 am

MeDeFe wrote:I like it (and coffee, too), the graphics need improvement, but I really like the general idea.

As for "awfully small", why did Doodle Earth get quenched then?


It was inherently unique at the time, both in gameplay (size) and in graphics style. :)


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Caffeine

Postby sailorseal on Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:00 am

AndyDufresne wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:I like it (and coffee, too), the graphics need improvement, but I really like the general idea.

As for "awfully small", why did Doodle Earth get quenched then?


It was inherently unique at the time, both in gameplay (size) and in graphics style. :)


--Andy

That is true but maybe he could make a few molecules and some cool graphics then this might work






(Andy makes everyone feel good about themselves :D )
User avatar
Cook sailorseal
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: conquerclub.com

Re: Caffeine

Postby Zajnet on Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:19 pm

Does anyone have any ideas as to how to improve the graphics? That was something I did in Photoshop in 5 minutes. Or does anyone have any ideas on how to make the gamplay unique?
Cook Zajnet
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 3:18 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby miniwally on Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:04 pm

Zajnet wrote:Does anyone have any ideas as to how to improve the graphics? That was something I did in Photoshop in 5 minutes. Or does anyone have any ideas on how to make the gamplay unique?


sorry i just down see the appeal what is so cool about being able to conquer an atom?
User avatar
Private 1st Class miniwally
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:56 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby sailorseal on Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:07 pm

Zajnet wrote:Does anyone have any ideas as to how to improve the graphics? That was something I did in Photoshop in 5 minutes. Or does anyone have any ideas on how to make the gamplay unique?

Image
Image
These may help give some inspiration
User avatar
Cook sailorseal
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: conquerclub.com

Re: Caffeine

Postby obliterationX on Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:18 pm

Coffee = better dice.
User avatar
Colonel obliterationX
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:52 pm
Location: Yeah

Re: Caffeine

Postby ustus on Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:33 pm

Sailor, those are ATOMS he wants to make a MOLECULE.

Perhaps you could increase the number of terits by including three levels of each atom? protons and neutrons in the middle, and then the electron shells can attack each other via covalent bonding?? idk i'm not sure how well this would work. Graphically, you'd want to know what you're gonna do gameplay wise before you start

As a note for size, Doodle Earth games tend to go quickly, neh? for those ppl who like doodle earth ( :roll: too small for me) caffeine seems to suggest a really fast gameplay. There are also some interesting ways of assigning bonuses here. I think there's potential... but it's probably a smaller map than i'd ever play. Which doesn't mean there isn't a place for the map.
User avatar
Corporal ustus
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:49 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby hecter on Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:06 pm

Here's a little proposal for the idea, presented in point form:

  • Each atom is a proper atom, with nucleus and electrons (as apposed to just H, or C)
  • Each electron can attack the nucleus it orbits around
  • Each electron can attack the nucleus of it's neighbour atoms
  • Each nucleus can attack any electron in it's orbit
  • Bonuses for holding a whole atom
  • Bonuses for holding all of one type of atom (all H's, all C's, etc.)
  • Bonuses for holding sections
  • Two connections mean nuclei can attack each other

Take from it what you will, but I think that would be a pretty bad ass map...
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Re: Caffeine

Postby Zajnet on Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:56 pm

hecter wrote:Here's a little proposal for the idea, presented in point form:

  • Each atom is a proper atom, with nucleus and electrons (as apposed to just H, or C)
  • Each electron can attack the nucleus it orbits around
  • Each electron can attack the nucleus of it's neighbour atoms
  • Each nucleus can attack any electron in it's orbit
  • Bonuses for holding a whole atom
  • Bonuses for holding all of one type of atom (all H's, all C's, etc.)
  • Bonuses for holding sections
  • Two connections mean nuclei can attack each other

Take from it what you will, but I think that would be a pretty bad ass map...


I like the idea a lot, but O has 6 valence electrons, N has 5, C has 4, and H has 1. This would be 96 territories total for caffeine. Maybe this idea would work on a simpler molecule, maybe Rubbing Alcohol (CH3CH2CH2OH), which would have 38 territories. Or, possible 3 or more water molecules Hydrogen bonded together (11 territs per H20).

What do y'all think? Should I pursue the idea as is with caffeine, or should I use a smaller molecule and have each nucleus/electron be a territory?
Cook Zajnet
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 3:18 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby hecter on Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:44 pm

I think you should use a smaller molecule. Perhaps something cool, like nitroglycerin:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... eletal.png
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Re: Caffeine

Postby Zajnet on Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:45 pm

Sigh.. using the nucleus/electron thing, nitroglycerin would also have 96 territs.
Cook Zajnet
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 3:18 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby hecter on Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:04 pm

It was just an idea... I'm not a big chemistry guy, so I don't really know many cool molucules (it just so happened that nitroglycerin popped into my head and on the wikipedia page was an atomic diagram thingy). Perhaps the molucules for gun powder, or cool fictional one like kryptonite... Perhaps diamond... There's plenty of ideas out there. Of course, then again, maybe a 96 territory map would be cool. Are you just including the valance electrons or all the others as well?
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Re: Caffeine

Postby FireStar on Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:17 pm

Well, if you don't necessarily want to put in the electrons and neutrons and stuff, maybe make a map with other molecules of interest...
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant FireStar
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:34 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby hecter on Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:19 pm

Oh, that's another thing... Are you doing the nucleus as one territ, or the protons and neutrons combined?
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Re: Caffeine

Postby neanderpaul14 on Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:20 pm

How about a THC molecule :P :P :P
User avatar
Cook neanderpaul14
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: "Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy if possible." - Thomas J. Jackson

Re: Caffeine

Postby FireStar on Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:24 pm

and each molecule could be a bonus... this has so many possibilities it blows my mind :D
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant FireStar
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:34 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby Merciless Wong on Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:27 am

Put two caffine molecules on the page... Call one S-bucky and the other one DD Nuts.. Call it coffee wars
and come up with a bonus scheme on number of C's, O's and H's achieved. Use careful neutral placement to achieve balance.
As long its non geographical
Sergeant 1st Class Merciless Wong
 
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:12 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby Zajnet on Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:15 pm

Merciless Wong wrote:Put two caffine molecules on the page... Call one S-bucky and the other one DD Nuts.. Call it coffee wars
and come up with a bonus scheme on number of C's, O's and H's achieved. Use careful neutral placement to achieve balance.
As long its non geographical


I like this idea.
I'll post a mock-up in the next couple of days.
After I finish this map, I'll figure out what other molecules to do.
Cook Zajnet
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 3:18 pm

Re: Caffeine

Postby MrBenn on Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:47 am

[Moved]

This map has been moved into the Ideas subforum, as it does not meet the criteria for a Working Draft:

Drafting Room Guidelines

To be considered a Working Draft a project must be more than just an idea; a Draft should have a clear thematic focus, a plan for how the gameplay will work, and a basic image which should include:
    1. Territory Labels - temporary names or numbers will suffice, and are always open to change.
    2. Borders/Paths/Impassables - it should be made clear where territories do/do not connect.
    3. Bonus Areas - where combinations/groups of territories will award a bonus, this should be indicated on the map.
    4. Legend - speculative bonus values and explanations of any attack rules or gameplay features.
Draft images should not be larger than 630x600px (small image) or 840x800px (large image).
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
Lieutenant MrBenn
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Next

Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users