- Click image to enlarge.
- Click image to enlarge.
Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
yeti_c wrote:The word "Territories" is not au fait with the site...
This needs to be changed to "Region"
http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?m ... tructions2
C.
edbeard wrote:yeti_c wrote:The word "Territories" is not au fait with the site...
This needs to be changed to "Region"
http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?m ... tructions2
C.
thanks. will do
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
danfrank wrote:Land and sea territories are only connected via arrows... Region MS in the middle of eurasia connects to which... No arrows are in the region... Does that region need to be in play? it is only cramping the already cramped area
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
cairnswk wrote:So the xml stamp now gets issued without the two images of the "88 centered" armies for both maps?
Last time i looked "88 centering" was still the standard for centering, and so far i haven't seen evidence of that.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:cairnswk wrote:So the xml stamp now gets issued without the two images of the "88 centered" armies for both maps?
Last time i looked "88 centering" was still the standard for centering, and so far i haven't seen evidence of that.
So far as I remember the forza stamp was for everything but coordinates? Those are checked by the community, not forza.
cairnswk wrote:gimil wrote:cairnswk wrote:So the xml stamp now gets issued without the two images of the "88 centered" armies for both maps?
Last time i looked "88 centering" was still the standard for centering, and so far i haven't seen evidence of that.
So far as I remember the forza stamp was for everything but coordinates? Those are checked by the community, not forza.
Oh, really.....
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:cairnswk wrote:gimil wrote:cairnswk wrote:So the xml stamp now gets issued without the two images of the "88 centered" armies for both maps?
Last time i looked "88 centering" was still the standard for centering, and so far i haven't seen evidence of that.
So far as I remember the forza stamp was for everything but coordinates? Those are checked by the community, not forza.
Oh, really.....
I don't stamp XML so I could be wrong but that was the impression I put myself under. Forza stamp is for what forza checks. coordinate centering is a nit pick left to the community.
edbeard wrote:just because they're not posted here doesn't mean he didn't look at them whilst checking the connections. I think that's a better way of doing it anyway.
cairnswk wrote:edbeard wrote:just because they're not posted here doesn't mean he didn't look at them whilst checking the connections. I think that's a better way of doing it anyway.
No edbeard. that appears to be your way of doing it. This sentence hardly makes sense in response to what I said.
I have now made 22 maps, and the process that was instilled in me by Andy is that you put your maps up showing the 88 & 888 centering done in these last throws of the thread along with the links to the large and small files and xml file (all together) if you want it stamped and quenched.
if you've done that on previous pages, then it would be up to you to move advance it forward for viewing by the community and whoever is stamping/quenching.
This method has worked very well for many maps over the past two years that i have been here.
edit: edbeard wrote:Also, no one has answered my question as to why an XML has to be hosted to use the new tool / centering. Previously, you could use the browse feature. Maybe you still can and I haven't figured out how to do it properly but without knowing the reasoning as to why it's this way now, it seems silly.
oaktown wrote:cairnswk wrote:Also, no one has answered my question as to why an XML has to be hosted to use the new tool / centering. Previously, you could use the browse feature. Maybe you still can and I haven't figured out how to do it properly but without knowing the reasoning as to why it's this way now, it seems silly.
....
oaktown wrote:..... It's good to have more sets of eyes involved. In the case of this map the background colors were pretty straightforward, so I checked the centering myself and approved it.
gimil wrote:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users