slove [noted]

[INFO]

Accused:

slove is a multi account of one of the following:

alley103 (this one I think)
ericv
ender007


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis


Game number(s):

all slove games


Comments:

They won a game of quads fair and square, multi or not, but in the last turn they had a chance to deply 40 armies from a set to kill our last 3 armies - they didn't fort themselves and finish it, instead they forted the next player, who then as that player logged off they immeditaely logged back on as the next player and then finished the game. (plus they have only ever played together, joined up never played a standard game, just a tiny bit of ranking boosting and then into team games - very suspicious.

[king sam]

Accused:
alley103
ericv
ender007
slove

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis


Game number(s):

all slove games

Comments:
They won a game of quads fair and square, multi or not, but in the last turn they had a chance to deploy 40 armies from a set to kill our last 3 armies - they didn't fort themselves and finish it, instead they forted the next player, who then as that player logged off they immediately logged back on as the next player and then finished the game. (plus they have only ever played together, joined up never played a standard game, just a tiny bit of ranking boosting and then into team games - very suspicious.

First off slove has completed like 107 games and 49 of them have been quads games with the other 3 that you have mentioned.

Im going to hang myself out there and say that maybe, just maybe they are a group that likes to play together.

I dunno, I could be wrong. [/sarcasm]

[INFO]

I see your point, but as you say slove has played 107 games - not one of them has not inculded those players - perhaps this further proves your point?

So if I wanted to get a good doubles/triples/quads team together and I didn't have enough (or wanted to ensure they played how I like to play) then I could set up a multi account and only use it in team games with my main account, and this would then prove to you that it was not a multi account, as it only was used with the same players????

If I could do a sarcasm tab I would have been using it just then...

I know I've only played a few hundred games, but I personally found the intricacies of the game in its different forms can not be picked up after 1 game. slove was a genius from game 1, almost as if he'd played it before you might think...

Surely you can just check the IPs that they log on from, I'd be willing to suggest you would find a match.

If like slove you were a non paying account and can only play 4 games, you wouldn't not finish a game off when you can fort 40 to beat 3, as you would want the space to start your next game. Therefore, when they forted the next player instead, conveniently knowing they are about to log in and finish it anyway, is the most suspicious thing I have ever seen since I joined - in fact the only suspicious thing, but there you go.

I was only trying to keep the site honest, if I'm wrong I apologise, but my spidey sense was tingling a lot at the time...

[king achilles]

These accounts could be family members. For now, we would need more than what we have right now if we are to move forward with a possibility of one or all of these accounts are indeed multis with each other.