Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Fruitcake wrote:
...It means that a clan with a rep such as the TNT (with a lot of ex farmers guild members) are able to manipulate the system to their advantage. It matters not if it didn't work in this case, what you have shown is that it can happen.
Fruitcake wrote:I do have to ask....why are you surprised? TNT have a bad reputation anyway, and provide little positive input to the site except to try to use loopholes in the system. This begs the question as to why you joined a game with one of them in the first place.
There are 37 members currently in tnt, out of that 37, 3 maybe 4 of them were in the FG.
You think that less than 10% is "a lot"?
You mean positive input like one tnt member lanyards, who has participated in the creation of 3 maps that we all enjoy playing on?
Or like myself who has bought countless premium memberships for other players who did not have the means to buy them for themselves?
Or another member, King_herpes, who has had many many players of all ranks and skill levels thank him for making them better players, either through observation or playing against/with him.
aliakber1001 wrote:demonfork you are what we can ah how u say son of bi.tch.
bitch you think because you won one game against me it make you good. punk ass.
and yes you are a cheater and so is your whole damn clan.oh yea and bi.tch i still have the emails where i asked you to play me, and u kept refusing to play with different reasons every time which were as stupid as your excuse here that u were baby sitting.
you know your chicken and so do i, so no need to prove other wise, and if you like ill post the emails where
one time i ask u to play, u say. oh i have to go to bed. then when i play tdan hour later, your ass is in the game chatting again. where did your sleep go?
and then again i asked u next day, and u replyed with... i am trying to get to general. i dont want to play a 50/50 game.
althought it wont be fifty fifty because i would beat the shit out of your ass.
oh yea and my i say, as a side not. at the same time you had set up a private game for farming, and were looking for a farming person. which you did find.
hey wait wasnt farming outlawed. i guess not as long as your TNT.
anyway punk ass bit.ch your not even worth my time, i just layed out things they why they are.
and your chicken ass is afraid. i got emails to back it up. and you farming for low ranks at the same time by setting private game to prove it. because u knew i was on line and if u had made an open game i would have joined.
wait let me post it here. for anyone else who wants to take action and make a seperate thread for farming by demonfork. because i frankly dont want to waste my time with this fool.
let me post game number for the record
4236200
oh wait. here is another one right too short after that
4239393 farming number 2
oh wait shit damn i thought farming wasnt cool. wait heress another one short after that one
4242443 farming game number 3
wait arent the mods supose to take action ? i guess not because demonforks wasnt farming. he was just inviting his friends to play. lmfao. what a joke, this site is starting to become a joke.
demonfork wrote:
3rd, if you were to remove your head from your ass for maybe 2 or more minutes, you would discover that the anti-farming statement, made by Lack, only applies to those that participate in the "systematic targeting of new recruits".
Fruitcake wrote:There are 37 members currently in tnt, out of that 37, 3 maybe 4 of them were in the FG.
You think that less than 10% is "a lot"?
How many is it? 3 or 4 or more perhaps? Please be precise and do not try to obfuscate the matter. if it's 4 then it is more than '10%'...please do not try to manipulate the numbers.
ok, lets say that it's 4 out of 37 that would equate to 10.8%, do you believe that 10.8% is "a lot"You mean positive input like one tnt member lanyards, who has participated in the creation of 3 maps that we all enjoy playing on?
This would be the same lanyards who enjoyed suckering new members (many of whom still haven't returned to the site) on one of those maps he created would it?
Out of the 3 maps that lany helped create, there are currenty 21,985 completed/active games that were/are being enjoyed on these maps by CC members. Is this not a positive contribution?
How may maps have you helped create my fruity friend?
Furthermore, who are these players that you claim he suckered, and if they did leave the site can you prove that it was due to lanyards suckering?Or like myself who has bought countless premium memberships for other players who did not have the means to buy them for themselves?
This is meant to impress? Well here's a tip, never talk about what you have done for others, it makes you look small.
Not meant to impress, the only reason why I brought it up was to challenge your accusation that TNT members don't contribute positively to CCOr another member, King_herpes, who has had many many players of all ranks and skill levels thank him for making them better players, either through observation or playing against/with him.
This would be the same King Herpes who glorified in the way the FG conducted themselves would it? This would be the same player who's actions, along with those of the FG' brought about a change in the way this site was structured earlier this year would it? if you are to pick an example, do try to pick one with some kind of reputation that hasn't been completely burnt by previous actions.
Nothing that KH did was against any rules and the fact still remains that KH is very well respected amongst the vast majority of his opponents/team mates.
This thread (now merged) was started because of the actions of one of the players in your clan. I would not have mentioned it had you not seen fit to dive into the game as an observer and post. That only served to exacerbate the situation.
In no way was my chat participation meant to exacerbate the situation, I was trying to offer some diffusion and perspective.
Finally, as if to confirm the kind of people you are...not one of you actually admitted to the change of player ever during the whole time. Ali had a screenshot of the flag changing midgame! Yet not one of you (and god knows how many were involved by this time...at least 3 with yourself included) had the decency to even say, "Hey. sorry, this should not have happened without someone telling you...."
There is no rule that states that one must announce that they are sitting for another player, I agree it might be a courteous action to do so, but not mandatory.
And you ask me why your bunch have the kind of reps I mention?
I am proud of the many positive contributions that my fellow TNT clan mates and I have made to this community, your opinion on the matter does not alter the truth of this.
demonfork wrote:There is no rule that states that one must announce that they are sitting for another player, I agree it might be a courteous action to do so, but not mandatory.
Megadeth666 wrote:demonfork wrote:There is no rule that states that one must announce that they are sitting for another player, I agree it might be a courteous action to do so, but not mandatory.
Right there you are stating ,you are using, and abusing the system, way to go
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=73729&p=1773457#p1773457
this suggestion could be used in a case like this specially a certain post
like sign in player :soka
password:password/ not needed if only a sub/babysitter
baby sitter password-player:sub one
then you can only pick 2 baby sitters
and it automaticly list the babysitters id in game chat
2008-12-27 06:00:00 - Megadeth666:/is subbing for soka
This way it is automatically posted that there is a so-called "babysitter"
as soon as someone is babysittng it automatically tell the room in chat
nagerous wrote:Wow, the members of this clan are developing quite the reputation for cheating.
BaldAdonis wrote:nagerous wrote:Wow, the members of this clan are developing quite the reputation for cheating.
Group Leader: King_Herpes
What did you expect?
All of those players should be banned. And nothing of value will be lost.
Megadeth666 wrote:Until Lack changes the rule, or the code...where if someone else signs in to there account, it automatically says it is a babysitter, or in their case a cheater...they will continue to abuse the system
BaldAdonis wrote:Megadeth666 wrote:Until Lack changes the rule, or the code...where if someone else signs in to there account, it automatically says it is a babysitter, or in their case a cheater...they will continue to abuse the system
With the evidence they have, they can block them from playing with each other. At least that solves the problem that initiated this thread.
I think the outline of "abuse" by account sitters was made clear when SkyT got written up for it. They all know that they're cheating, but they're happy to keep doing it, because that's the only way they can play.
Megadeth666 wrote:BaldAdonis wrote:Megadeth666 wrote:Until Lack changes the rule, or the code...where if someone else signs in to there account, it automatically says it is a babysitter, or in their case a cheater...they will continue to abuse the system
With the evidence they have, they can block them from playing with each other. At least that solves the problem that initiated this thread.
I think the outline of "abuse" by account sitters was made clear when SkyT got written up for it. They all know that they're cheating, but they're happy to keep doing it, because that's the only way they can play.
I Think that Maxstuy dude got banned for babysitting abuse too? Didn't he
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
Xav1er wrote:stop clan members from playing with eachother vs others in standard games
Xav1er wrote:How about someone that works for this site and can do something speaks instead of filling up my topic with utter garbage?!?! lol simple way to fix things, improve the clan aspect and stop clan members from playing with eachother vs others in standard games. its a hidden alliance even though its F*CKING OBVIOUS that they are helping eachother maintain or gain rank.. damn
jarrett155 wrote:dont you guys have better crap to do then write really long posts all day arguing(king achiles doesnt count)
Megadeth666 wrote:Until Lack changes the rule, or the code...where if someone else signs in to there account, it automatically says it is a babysitter, or in their case a cheater...they will continue to abuse the system
JCKing wrote:Responding to your post Owenshooter. And the one before, it would be great to show if a baby sitter is logged on and I'm all for it. Hmm possibility is that they have baby sitting passwords implemented in the system so basically a 2nd password where the person baby sitting can only sign into make moves. I would love to see this implemented to clear my name from what I shouldn't be included in.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users