gimil wrote:....
Cains you know I mean no harm, I respect you to much to let you go ahead with something that I believe is a sub standard to what you are capable of.
the community will speak Gimil.
Moderator: Cartographers
gimil wrote:....
Cains you know I mean no harm, I respect you to much to let you go ahead with something that I believe is a sub standard to what you are capable of.
gimil wrote:...
Cains you know I mean no harm, I respect you to much to let you go ahead with something that I believe is a sub standard to what you are capable of.
ZeakCytho wrote:There's no in the middle option
Are the graphics "good enough"? Yes, I think so. Could they be greatly improved upon, to add more character, theme, and substance? I think they could be.
cairnswk wrote:OK guys... i think the graphics on this on are pretty good for the subject matter.
If you think they can be improved....what suggestions do you have to offer that might accomplish this.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:cairnswk wrote:OK guys... i think the graphics on this on are pretty good for the subject matter.
If you think they can be improved....what suggestions do you have to offer that might accomplish this.
I really don't know cairns. You remeber when WM revamped montreal. The exact same map only better? I think the same thing could be done here.
Let me give it a good think.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:Cairns he is something small that I think may make a substancial difference to my opinion.
See those connectinos between families and their childrens etc. Would you try making them a darker shade of grey or maybe a little transparent please? This I envision will give so lift you the actually play area and maybe add a little more character. It might be the same white from top to bottom that is making me think flat. if this idea works the only issue I will have has issues with the title area and legends, but I haved usd enough brainpower on this map today. I will get back to it tomorrow.
Sound like a plan?
InkL0sed wrote:I also think the title is perfect.
InkL0sed wrote:Julia and Marcus Agrippa can both attack all of their children, right?
Because it does look like only Agrippa can attack Postumus, and only Julia can attack Gaius Caesar. You might want to make all of the lines converge and connect under the marriage ring to show that they can both attack all of them.
Yes, there doesn't seem to be a lot of support fort5 this one; mind you, there doesn't seem to be a lot of posting going on at all at the moment. I do notice there are lots of players visiting, but simply not commenting.The Neon Peon wrote:We are obviously not getting enough votes.
Might I suggest that you play around with the red background and see if something else might be better. I personally think it looks fine, but it might make Gimil happy....
the.killing.44 wrote:I'm not going to vote because I'm on the ropes here…on one hand I do think that the graphics are very flat and that does take away from the appeal, but on the other that's what it is, isn't it? A family tree — you can't make it a terraform or something like that. So, I would like more vibrant graphics, but I think that they're fine because of the theme of the map.
.44
P.S. I love the title, but instead of putting "by Cairns" are you going to put the renowned butterfly?
cairnswk wrote:Then if you think they're fine, perhaps you could vote, yes?
the.killing.44 wrote:cairnswk wrote:Then if you think they're fine, perhaps you could vote, yes?
Alright, I voted, but I'm still not sold if you know what I mean
.44
the.killing.44 wrote:=D> I love the gold, very royal, and it makes the map much less, well, boring. Nicely done.
.44
cairnswk wrote:the one leading from Gaius Octavius and Atia Caesonia
cairnswk wrote:the one leading from Gaius Octavius and Atia Caesonia
Users browsing this forum: No registered users