gambler21210 AKA t-o-m [cleared/noted]

by **sailorseal** on Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:47 pm

Hey go checkout the last 50 threads I have only been wrong once

by **Jeff Hardy** on Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:49 pm

and you didnt choose a side in the other 49 :lol:

only kidding man

by **sailorseal** on Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:53 pm

Jeff Hardy wrote:
only kidding man

Were you kidding when you said I was wrong or is this referring to something else?

by **Jeff Hardy** on Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:55 pm

sailorseal wrote:
Jeff Hardy wrote:
only kidding man

Were you kidding when you said I was wrong or is this referring to something else?

tom and gambler arent multis but i was joking about what i wrote above what you quoted

by **sailorseal** on Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:00 pm

sailorseal wrote:I would agree I have looked at these games and their past games I think they had some sort of short term alliance, can a mod get their PMs? If a mod can go check and see if they talked about a alliance

I never said they are multis just a alliance...

by **Darwins_Bane** on Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:27 pm

Also, just to clear one thing up, mods cannot check the PM inboxes. It's a privacy thing so the only way to get any possibly incriminating evidence is if one of them gives you a PM with it. Not taking a side, just saying.

by **gcwca_4_life** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:50 am

Wow. Why was this thread even brought back from the dead? This is from ages ago.
Can someone move this or check it out? It's months old and should be gone by now.

by **Darwins_Bane** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:53 pm

gcwca_4_life wrote:Wow. Why was this thread even brought back from the dead? This is from ages ago.
Can someone move this or check it out? It's months old and should be gone by now.

Because some people like to go through all the threads in C&A and post in all of them...multiple times

by **sailorseal** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:26 pm

Darwins_Bane wrote:
gcwca_4_life wrote:Wow. Why was this thread even brought back from the dead? This is from ages ago.
Can someone move this or check it out? It's months old and should be gone by now.

Because some people like to go through all the threads in C&A and post in all of them...multiple times

I like to post in C&A but I would never revive something like this.

by **Darwins_Bane** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:00 pm

sailorseal wrote:
Darwins_Bane wrote:
gcwca_4_life wrote:Wow. Why was this thread even brought back from the dead? This is from ages ago.
Can someone move this or check it out? It's months old and should be gone by now.

Because some people like to go through all the threads in C&A and post in all of them...multiple times

I like to post in C&A but I would never revive something like this.

yet you did.

by **Megadeth666** on Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:08 pm

nagerous wrote:Not multis, but the case for a secret alliance we'll see what the hunters think.

by **king achilles** on Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:35 am

The games mentioned here are still not strong enough to incriminate them.

Two assassin doodle games? Judging from the games they have played together so far, they do try different types of games and no obvious pattern of malicious plays. They seem competitive enough when they play their games. This is cleared but still noted.