c2los666 [Busted]

by **samuelc812** on Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:30 pm

Accused:

c2los666

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=74591&p=1789544#p1789544

Comments:
It's Stephen Wayne

by **c2los666** on Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:34 pm

samuelc812 wrote:need i go on

yeah

by **e_i_pi** on Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:35 pm

Accused:

c2los666

The accused are suspected of:

Being a Banned Player

Total contribution to the site so far:

0 games
6 posts in The Firing of Wicked
1 post in C&A Thread
Good for a laugh... a website worth a whopping $518.30 - nice to see a good 3 months work has amounted to a total value of $43 a week. Maybe you'll be able to afford that crack pipe you were hoping to get for Christmas

Comments:

Yet another attempt by the pariah kiddy to get back into the playground with their former playmates
Hint: Next time, don't be a douche

by **c2los666** on Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:38 pm

Im not banned yet and did you dont see the other thread about me?

by **DaGip** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:11 am

c2los666 wrote:
samuelc812 wrote:need i go on

yeah

Go with yo bad self...

by **DaGip** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:13 am

This thread should be merged...

by **InkL0sed** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:19 am

Clearly not wicked...

by **DaGip** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:25 am

I think it was just a little kid that was spamming up the forum, that's all...no way that was wicked.

by **samuelc812** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:31 am

Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user

by **DaGip** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:36 am

samuelc812 wrote:Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user

It might be a little punk friend of a previously banned user and the previously banned user told the punk friend how to really get at some people on the forums, just for a little punk laugh. That wouldn't be a multi, but more "trollish" and is dignified a "time out" and not a permaban from the site.

by **Megadeth666** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:46 am

mmmm, could it be someone that received a ban recently? :roll:

by **e_i_pi** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:54 am

Megadeth666 wrote::shock: mmmm, could it be someone that received a ban recently?

I don't see them playing any games against ?'s

by **hwhrhett** on Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:57 pm

DaGip wrote:
samuelc812 wrote:Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user

It might be a little punk friend of a previously banned user and the previously banned user told the punk friend how to really get at some people on the forums, just for a little punk laugh. That wouldn't be a multi, but more "trollish" and is dignified a "time out" and not a permaban from the site.

dignified?