Moderator: Cartographers
I am not offended. I just don't know how to make the bunch of grapes look better at that size. Do you have any suggestions?edbeard wrote:well uhh. I don't think it looks like a bunch of grapes. no offense. sorry to bring it up so late.
I agree they fit better. Glass and bottleedbeard wrote:bottle n glass fit better with the other icons but the bear feels more "California" to me. I'll abstain.
e_i_pi wrote:One of the mods requested I post this, I can't remember which one as the PM is gone I believe it is the mod who is in charge of stamping gameplay on this map? iancanton perhaps?
It's chances in a 1v1 game of a player starting with bonuses. I'm only posting those bonuses which are greater than 2%:
West 24 starting terts
8.43% - 3 Capitals
Southwest 32 starting terts
20.39% - 3 Capitals
5.35% - 4 Capitals
Rockies 40 starting terts
21.11% - 4 Capitals
8.26% - 5 Capitals
2.89% - North Dakota
Southeast 40 starting terts
11.22% - 4 Capitals
2.42% - 5 Capitals
Great lakes 57 starting terts / 1 starting neutral
33.33% - DC Does not apply. It starts with 3 neutrals
10.71% - Delaware
3.31% - West Virginia
New England 35 starting terts
9.24% - Rhode Island
2.52% - New Hampshire
2.52% - Vermont
2.52% - Connecticut
iancanton wrote:my apologies for the delay in replying. i'm told that i'll have internet at home again this evening.
thanks for the numerical analysis, e_i_pi. this is very illuminating. i assume that player 1 has a less than 2% chance of gaining from the drop any of the existing capital bonuses for great lakes and new england and that's why they don't appear on the list.
wm, can u eliminate the following bonuses: southwest 3 capitals, rockies 4 capitals and southeast 4 capitals? these three maps are smaller than classic and i'd like to cut the chance of an uneven start. as we discussed before, i agree that the big great lakes map has enough happening elsewhere that +1 for delaware won't be game-winning in itself; new england is a small map and +1 for rhode island could well boost a player's chances significantly, but 9.24% is borderline and i'm happy for the existing rhode island to survive unaltered to the beta stage.
while u wait for the foundry stamps, have u checked to see whether there are any cities whose name appears on more than one of the six maps? this is in case u choose to make a super-size usa map in future that stitches everything together. it's not that important, just a point of detail.
ian.
Delaware is on the largest map.edbeard wrote:how do these +1 bonuses have a larger effect on larger maps than an easier to get +1 on a smaller map in Delaware?
WidowMakers wrote:Delaware is on the largest map.edbeard wrote:how do these +1 bonuses have a larger effect on larger maps than an easier to get +1 on a smaller map in Delaware?
WM
So are you saying I must delete these to get the stamps? I do agree with edbeardiancanton wrote:wm, can u eliminate the following bonuses: southwest 3 capitals, rockies 4 capitals and southeast 4 capitals? these three maps are smaller than classic and i'd like to cut the chance of an uneven start. as we discussed before, i agree that the big great lakes map has enough happening elsewhere that +1 for delaware won't be game-winning in itself; new england is a small map and +1 for rhode island could well boost a player's chances significantly, but 9.24% is borderline and i'm happy for the existing rhode island to survive unaltered to the beta stage.
Since teh way I will be naming the cities is different in teh Large map (if i do it). It will not matter if they have the same name. The names will be the abbreviation for the State and then the first two letters of the city. But that is a LOOOOOOOOOONG way off and I will not adjust these maps to fit within that idea. It will need to adjust later.iancanton wrote:while u wait for the foundry stamps, have u checked to see whether there are any cities whose name appears on more than one of the six maps? this is in case u choose to make a super-size usa map in future that stitches everything together. it's not that important, just a point of detail.
edbeard wrote:rhode island I meant. on the New England mapedbeard wrote:how do these +1 bonuses have a larger effect on larger maps than an easier to get +1 on a smaller map in Delaware?
iancanton wrote:e_i_pi, are the percentages the probability of player 1 starting with exactly the stated number of capitals or at least the stated number? if it is the latter, then i can accept running with the 11.22% on southeast.
ian.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users