Conquer Club

jhn,ron1805,micros123 [Cleared of Multi]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

jhn,ron1805,micros123 [Cleared of Multi]

Postby penfold6 on Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:54 am

These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: jhn,ron1805,micros123

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=150282

Comments: All 3 joint same time all from same country, only attacking each other to gain continents


penfold6
User avatar
Corporal penfold6
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:58 am
Location: England

no alliance here!

Postby jhn on Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:40 am

friend at work invited us to play here.
As far as I can tell only attacking to gain continents, or prevent someone else from keeping/gaining one, is called solid tactics.
At least we don't run out on games when we can't win.
Private jhn
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:28 am

Postby micros123 on Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:44 am

I was not part of the game with Penfold but a spectator. Jhn and Ron1805 were attacking each other as well. If they just wanted points they would just crush you.
If there's a game log this will be easily verified.
User avatar
Corporal micros123
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:20 am
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Postby redrob on Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:27 am

As far as I can tell only attacking to gain continents, or prevent someone else from keeping/gaining one, is called solid tactics.


Except you arent preventing each other from holding continents. When between you you held europe and asia (one each) and had a set of cards to use, you would have had ample units to attack the other and so stop them holding their continent. INstead you both attacked down into Penfold and left the other alone and so let them gain their bonuses next round. If that isnt an alliance, can you explain what it was.

This was Penfolds reason for reporting this one (as his regular doubles partner he askd me to look at this game) and it was pretty damn obvious they were not making any effort to disrupt the other player.

As they have confused they all know each other and i think the game log makes it clear they are concentrating on taking out the third player and so leaving them to fight out for the win. So, whilst not a multi, its an alliance. They may deny it but i think the log is pretty clear, and looking at another game they are involved in I'd suggest exactly the same thing is happening there.

Answer surely is to ban them playing against each other in any games, that way they cannot be accused of cheating.
Sergeant 1st Class redrob
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:00 pm

Postby micros123 on Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:37 am

There's one game where all three of us played so nothing wrong there.
There's one other game, but that one is totally undecided, so no extra evidence at all.
User avatar
Corporal micros123
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:20 am
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Postby AndyDufresne on Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:29 pm

Well what I can say jhn, ron1805, micros123 are CLEARED of multiple accounts. Regarding the secret alliance, feel free to leave the appropriate feedback and/or add them to your ignore list. If things seem to persist, we can look into blocking them from playing together.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users