Conquer Club

I hate signatures with pictures in them

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Pictures sigs?

 
Total votes : 0

I hate signatures with pictures in them

Postby Hoff on Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:33 pm

I hate all of you with pictures for signatures, its just freaking obnoxious. Stop it, it doesn't make you cool.
User avatar
Sergeant Hoff
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: I hate signatures with pictures in them

Postby XenHu on Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:33 pm

Hoff wrote:I hate all of you with pictures for signatures, its just freaking obnoxious. Stop it, it doesn't make you cool.


Obnoxious? How so?
User avatar
Cook XenHu
 
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Postby Hoff on Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:35 pm

They are annoying to look at, I dont want to look at your enormous picture 5 times while scrolling down. It clutters up the screen, doesnt look good, just annoying.
User avatar
Sergeant Hoff
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Postby XenHu on Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:36 pm

Hoff wrote:They are annoying to look at, I dont want to look at your enormous picture 5 times while scrolling down. It clutters up the screen, doesnt look good, just annoying.


What sigs are you looking at? They don't get any bigger than the pic in my sig..
User avatar
Cook XenHu
 
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Postby millej11 on Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:46 pm

You need to chill man. It is custom for almost all forums to have people with pictures in their sigs. I was suprised to see the lack of people with pictures in their sigs, and the hostility towards people with them.

The size should be limited though, to probably a max of 150 pixles of height
Last edited by millej11 on Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Private millej11
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Postby Hoff on Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:46 pm

XenHu wrote:
Hoff wrote:They are annoying to look at, I dont want to look at your enormous picture 5 times while scrolling down. It clutters up the screen, doesnt look good, just annoying.


What sigs are you looking at? They don't get any bigger than the pic in my sig..


Not that your pic in particular is obnoxious, but it is big and it is obnoxious to scroll down and see that pic over and over and over again mixed in with a bunch of other pics.
User avatar
Sergeant Hoff
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Postby qeee1 on Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:23 pm

I agree more or less, but you're unlikely to persuade those who have them to change.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
User avatar
Colonel qeee1
 
Posts: 2904
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:43 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby happysadfun on Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:07 pm

Hmmm.... *ponders*
ImageChildren, this is what happens to hockey players, druggies, and Hillary Clinton.

Rope. Tree. Hillary. Some assembly required.
User avatar
Cadet happysadfun
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Haundin at DotSco, Being Sad that Mark Green Lost in Suburban Wisconsin

Postby Caleb the Cruel on Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:43 pm

Large picture sigs are annoying, they make some pages extremely long and sometimes make the page too wide for the screen so then everybody has to scroll from side to side and up and down.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Caleb the Cruel
 
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: I hate signatures with pictures in them

Postby DogDoc on Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:58 pm

Hoff wrote:I hate all of you with pictures for signatures, its just freaking obnoxious. Stop it, it doesn't make you cool.


I don't have a picture in my sig but since you object so strongly, I'll probably put one in!
WARNING: The light at the end of the tunnel is a train.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DogDoc
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:13 pm

Postby strike wolf on Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:06 pm

millej11 wrote:The size should be limited though, to probably a max of 150 pixles of height


I think that's what the limit is.
User avatar
Cadet strike wolf
 
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Postby reverend_kyle on Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:09 pm

I took the guideline size and used it when making my signature.. they shouldnt be any taller or wider than mine and if they are.. mod removal should intevene.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby stinkycheese on Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:25 pm

I hate avatars with pictures in them.
User avatar
Captain stinkycheese
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Postby Hoff on Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:27 pm

qeee1 wrote:I agree more or less, but you're unlikely to persuade those who have them to change.


Wasn't really trying to persuade anyway, just thought I'd bitch a bit lol.
User avatar
Sergeant Hoff
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Postby reverend_kyle on Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:44 pm

Hoff wrote:
qeee1 wrote:I agree more or less, but you're unlikely to persuade those who have them to change.


Wasn't really trying to persuade anyway, just thought I'd bitch a bit lol.



FLAME WARS>>>
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby Ronaldinho on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:03 pm

stupid looking pictures do my head in :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Image
User avatar
Sergeant Ronaldinho
 
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: Dorset, England.

Postby Hoff on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:14 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
Hoff wrote:
qeee1 wrote:I agree more or less, but you're unlikely to persuade those who have them to change.


Wasn't really trying to persuade anyway, just thought I'd bitch a bit lol.



FLAME WARS>>>


I'm not flaming anyone inparticular, just expressing my distaste for pictures sigs. So shut it.
User avatar
Sergeant Hoff
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Postby XenHu on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:15 pm

Hoff wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
Hoff wrote:
qeee1 wrote:I agree more or less, but you're unlikely to persuade those who have them to change.


Wasn't really trying to persuade anyway, just thought I'd bitch a bit lol.



FLAME WARS>>>


I'm not flaming anyone inparticular, just expressing my distaste for pictures sigs. So shut it.


](*,)
User avatar
Cook XenHu
 
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Postby millej11 on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:16 pm

Hoff wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
Hoff wrote:
qeee1 wrote:I agree more or less, but you're unlikely to persuade those who have them to change.


Wasn't really trying to persuade anyway, just thought I'd bitch a bit lol.



FLAME WARS>>>


I'm not flaming anyone inparticular, just expressing my distaste for pictures sigs. So shut it.


Why don't you hate pictures in the avatar? Are you racist against sigs?
Image
User avatar
Private millej11
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Postby XenHu on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:21 pm

millej11 wrote:
Hoff wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
Hoff wrote:
qeee1 wrote:I agree more or less, but you're unlikely to persuade those who have them to change.


Wasn't really trying to persuade anyway, just thought I'd bitch a bit lol.



FLAME WARS>>>


I'm not flaming anyone inparticular, just expressing my distaste for pictures sigs. So shut it.


Why don't you hate pictures in the avatar? Are you racist against sigs?



:lol:
User avatar
Cook XenHu
 
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Postby Ronaldinho on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:21 pm

Sigs with pictures = yay \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/
Image
User avatar
Sergeant Ronaldinho
 
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: Dorset, England.

Postby millej11 on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:24 pm

Ronaldinho wrote:Sigs with pictures = yay \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/


Image


I thought it was against forum policy to post detailed pictures of your self.
Image
User avatar
Private millej11
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Postby Ronaldinho on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:32 pm

well i got my camra here so i thought why not
Image
User avatar
Sergeant Ronaldinho
 
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: Dorset, England.

Postby Hoff on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:47 pm

millej11 wrote:
Hoff wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
Hoff wrote:
qeee1 wrote:I agree more or less, but you're unlikely to persuade those who have them to change.


Wasn't really trying to persuade anyway, just thought I'd bitch a bit lol.



FLAME WARS>>>


I'm not flaming anyone inparticular, just expressing my distaste for pictures sigs. So shut it.


Why don't you hate pictures in the avatar? Are you racist against sigs?


Because avatars are meant to be pictures. They are small and uniform and don't get in the way of anything. How many time to you write your actual signature by drawing a freaking picture? None, and if you do you are retarded and shouldn't be signing anything anyway. But I do have a problem with obnoxiously animated avatars, some are ok, but some are just out of control
User avatar
Sergeant Hoff
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:46 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Postby millej11 on Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:51 pm

Your avatar is too big hoff. You must like drawing attention to your self
Image
User avatar
Private millej11
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Next

Return to Out, out, brief candle!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users