Conquer Club

Deliaselene and Laddida [blocked]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby gcwca_4_life on Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:06 pm

xxtig12683xx wrote:
clapper011 wrote:there seems to be some confusion, but i do not believe that delia or ladida or even gimil for that matter are guilty of cheating. Babysitting , well he posted that he was taking her turns, thats what he is suppose to do, regardless of what she was doing, he clearly stated that he was taking her turns. there have been many times that a person cannot actually take a turn, be it tired, or page not loading, or grease monkey not working , etc. does that mean they are cheaters? no not at all.


No confusion, delia already admitted she cant play, lol. I fully believe that laddida takes her turns.

"I must state that I babysit a account for phantomzero as does Max in Canada...

If I have too many games or I dont know the maps Max does the balance"

Thats from a previous thread where she edited that quote real fast when she realized how bad it looked :lol:


-tig


wow... and i wonder how many times you have had someone sit your account for you?!?! everyone, well most people on CC, have someone watch their games at least once while they are here.. and your no different that them.. at the moment yes i am sitting for two of my friends and i would do it for any of my other friends..
still that's no need for a stuck up colonel like yourself to say anything that you really have no clue what you are talking about.. i talk to both gimil and deliaselene on chat a lot and i know they are not and will not cheat.. the third person i don't talk to but still there is no reason for someone to get mad because someone couldn't take their turns and they had someone else do it.. i don't know how many times i have had to send GoVegan a text and ask him to play my games because i wouldn't be able to get on the computer that day.. that's what friends are for... you should know that unless your some cold hearted sob..
tdans wrote:lets rock this joint :D... or.. lets have them Blow this,,,,,, joint

I'm the insane guy, that you never wanna meet... See the end of my blade? It's sharp. hehe
Lieutenant gcwca_4_life
 
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby xxtig12683xx on Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:38 pm

gcwca_4_life wrote:
xxtig12683xx wrote:
clapper011 wrote:there seems to be some confusion, but i do not believe that delia or ladida or even gimil for that matter are guilty of cheating. Babysitting , well he posted that he was taking her turns, thats what he is suppose to do, regardless of what she was doing, he clearly stated that he was taking her turns. there have been many times that a person cannot actually take a turn, be it tired, or page not loading, or grease monkey not working , etc. does that mean they are cheaters? no not at all.


No confusion, delia already admitted she cant play, lol. I fully believe that laddida takes her turns.

"I must state that I babysit a account for phantomzero as does Max in Canada...

If I have too many games or I dont know the maps Max does the balance"

Thats from a previous thread where she edited that quote real fast when she realized how bad it looked :lol:


-tig


wow... and i wonder how many times you have had someone sit your account for you?!?! everyone, well most people on CC, have someone watch their games at least once while they are here.. and your no different that them.. at the moment yes i am sitting for two of my friends and i would do it for any of my other friends..
still that's no need for a stuck up colonel like yourself to say anything that you really have no clue what you are talking about.. i talk to both gimil and deliaselene on chat a lot and i know they are not and will not cheat.. the third person i don't talk to but still there is no reason for someone to get mad because someone couldn't take their turns and they had someone else do it.. i don't know how many times i have had to send GoVegan a text and ask him to play my games because i wouldn't be able to get on the computer that day.. that's what friends are for... you should know that unless your some cold hearted sob..


Do you read? it has nothing to do with account sitting, my problem is that she said she lets others take her turns on maps she does not know very well. That has NOTHING to do with account sitting, more like abuse of accounts. Get a clue :roll:


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class xxtig12683xx
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby Ray Rider on Sun Sep 14, 2008 6:00 pm

Frop wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:Emtec just has it out for Delia...

Why is that?

He created some thread earlier on about being on her foe list without ever having played her. He's definitely after her though and there's no end to his creativity.

Hmmm [-X

xxtig12683xx wrote:No confusion, delia already admitted she cant play, lol. I fully believe that laddida takes her turns.

"I must state that I babysit a account for phantomzero as does Max in Canada...

If I have too many games or I dont know the maps Max does the balance"

Thats from a previous thread where she edited that quote real fast when she realized how bad it looked :lol:

Do you have a link to that thread? Seems like hearsay to me. Besides, all the games Emtc provided are simple maps (Classic, USA, British Isles, Montreal), so it's not like the maps were too difficult for her.

I know that sometimes I`ve gone on a trip and didn`t think I`d have time or an internet connection during my trip, so I`ve asked an account sitter to watch my account for me. However I found an open internet connection at one place, so I signed on to my account, took my turns, talked a bit on the forum, and then had to go again, and never had another chance to go on the internet again (my account sitter covered for me the rest of the time). Looks to me like that`s what happened to Delia, too, since all those games were during the same week or whatever. She probably signed on, chatted on the forum, took as many turns as she had time for, and then left again.

firstholliday wrote:del and lad are friends. so maybe he took some turns...
he posted in chat he did...

no big deal

jiminski wrote:I have been in a situation where i went to play my game to find the start button being pressed in front of my eye.. that is what it is to have ones very own poltergeist!

clapper011 wrote:there seems to be some confusion, but i do not believe that delia or ladida or even gimil for that matter are guilty of cheating. Babysitting , well he posted that he was taking her turns, thats what he is suppose to do, regardless of what she was doing, he clearly stated that he was taking her turns. there have been many times that a person cannot actually take a turn, be it tired, or page not loading, or grease monkey not working , etc. does that mean they are cheaters? no not at all.

Agreed.
Image
Image
Highest score: 2221
User avatar
Major Ray Rider
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: In front of my computer, duh!

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby xxtig12683xx on Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:28 pm

Ray Rider wrote:
Frop wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:Emtec just has it out for Delia...

Why is that?

He created some thread earlier on about being on her foe list without ever having played her. He's definitely after her though and there's no end to his creativity.

Hmmm [-X

xxtig12683xx wrote:No confusion, delia already admitted she cant play, lol. I fully believe that laddida takes her turns.

"I must state that I babysit a account for phantomzero as does Max in Canada...

If I have too many games or I dont know the maps Max does the balance"

Thats from a previous thread where she edited that quote real fast when she realized how bad it looked :lol:

Do you have a link to that thread? Seems like hearsay to me. Besides, all the games Emtc provided are simple maps (Classic, USA, British Isles, Montreal), so it's not like the maps were too difficult for her.

I know that sometimes I`ve gone on a trip and didn`t think I`d have time or an internet connection during my trip, so I`ve asked an account sitter to watch my account for me. However I found an open internet connection at one place, so I signed on to my account, took my turns, talked a bit on the forum, and then had to go again, and never had another chance to go on the internet again (my account sitter covered for me the rest of the time). Looks to me like that`s what happened to Delia, too, since all those games were during the same week or whatever. She probably signed on, chatted on the forum, took as many turns as she had time for, and then left again.

firstholliday wrote:del and lad are friends. so maybe he took some turns...
he posted in chat he did...

no big deal

jiminski wrote:I have been in a situation where i went to play my game to find the start button being pressed in front of my eye.. that is what it is to have ones very own poltergeist!

clapper011 wrote:there seems to be some confusion, but i do not believe that delia or ladida or even gimil for that matter are guilty of cheating. Babysitting , well he posted that he was taking her turns, thats what he is suppose to do, regardless of what she was doing, he clearly stated that he was taking her turns. there have been many times that a person cannot actually take a turn, be it tired, or page not loading, or grease monkey not working , etc. does that mean they are cheaters? no not at all.

Agreed.


no i dont have the link, she edited the quote as soon as she realized how incriminating it looked, but others read it too...i really dont care, shes not as good as her rank indicates...and needs people to tell her what to do, but there are prolly lots of players that do that.


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class xxtig12683xx
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby Scott-Land on Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:54 am

Cheat threads are nothing but a breeding ground for hate. A place to flame those you dislike. Anyone can and will make a thread just to drag someone's good name through the mud.

The system allows players like emtec to do so because for every one they accuse albeit innocent or not, the admins bust far more real offenders- the collateral damage doesn't outweigh the good that comes from this forum.

We also have to wonder if emtec's strings aren't being pulled here as his new triples partner is Fruit. Perhaps through Fruit's dislike of Delia, it fueled this accusation. I only bring it up because Max and Prank did the same thing by having KG post in a recent cheat thread.
User avatar
Major Scott-Land
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby xxtig12683xx on Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:12 am

Scott-Land wrote:Cheat threads are nothing but a breeding ground for hate. A place to flame those you dislike. Anyone can and will make a thread just to drag someone's good name through the mud.

The system allows players like emtec to do so because for every one they accuse albeit innocent or not, the admins bust far more real offenders- the collateral damage doesn't outweigh the good that comes from this forum.

We also have to wonder if emtec's strings aren't being pulled here as his new triples partner is Fruit. Perhaps through Fruit's dislike of Delia, it fueled this accusation. I only bring it up because Max and Prank did the same thing by having KG post in a recent cheat thread.



fruit is a tool and thinks im a cheater. so i dont think he holds water...although he is a good poster just not a good player :lol:

but i think delia is guilty.


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class xxtig12683xx
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby maxatstuy on Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:03 am

xxtig12683xx wrote:
clapper011 wrote:there seems to be some confusion, but i do not believe that delia or ladida or even gimil for that matter are guilty of cheating. Babysitting , well he posted that he was taking her turns, thats what he is suppose to do, regardless of what she was doing, he clearly stated that he was taking her turns. there have been many times that a person cannot actually take a turn, be it tired, or page not loading, or grease monkey not working , etc. does that mean they are cheaters? no not at all.


No confusion, delia already admitted she cant play, lol. I fully believe that laddida takes her turns.

"I must state that I babysit a account for phantomzero as does Max in Canada...

If I have too many games or I dont know the maps Max does the balance"

Thats from a previous thread where she edited that quote real fast when she realized how bad it looked :lol:


-tig


Delia was referring to phantoms games, not her own. Why would you play for someone when you have no idea how to play that map or that style of game? Delia and Laddida are not abusing the account sitting rules as there is no strategical advantage playing for someone in a SEQUENTIAL game. They arent violating the rules and it is ridiculous that people come up with these ridiculous posts because of personal vendettas. Playing for someone else when there is no strategical advantage is allowed, and even if you claim it was delia posting in the forum, it very well could have been laddida posting something for delia as I have seen a few others do in their absence

It is one thing if they were clearly cheating and gaining points though violation of the rules as Scott and Bruce were doing, but in team games, you can communicate and tell other people what to do even if they have no clue. People forget to write that they were taking turns for someone as I imagine laddida did in that one game, but in general, they did nothing wrong and this thread is absurd.
User avatar
Field Marshal maxatstuy
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:39 am

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby xxtig12683xx on Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:11 am

maxatstuy wrote:
xxtig12683xx wrote:
clapper011 wrote:there seems to be some confusion, but i do not believe that delia or ladida or even gimil for that matter are guilty of cheating. Babysitting , well he posted that he was taking her turns, thats what he is suppose to do, regardless of what she was doing, he clearly stated that he was taking her turns. there have been many times that a person cannot actually take a turn, be it tired, or page not loading, or grease monkey not working , etc. does that mean they are cheaters? no not at all.


No confusion, delia already admitted she cant play, lol. I fully believe that laddida takes her turns.

"I must state that I babysit a account for phantomzero as does Max in Canada...

If I have too many games or I dont know the maps Max does the balance"

Thats from a previous thread where she edited that quote real fast when she realized how bad it looked :lol:


-tig


Delia was referring to phantoms games, not her own. Why would you play for someone when you have no idea how to play that map or that style of game? Delia and Laddida are not abusing the account sitting rules as there is no strategical advantage playing for someone in a SEQUENTIAL game. They arent violating the rules and it is ridiculous that people come up with these ridiculous posts because of personal vendettas. Playing for someone else when there is no strategical advantage is allowed, and even if you claim it was delia posting in the forum, it very well could have been laddida posting something for delia as I have seen a few others do in their absence

It is one thing if they were clearly cheating and gaining points though violation of the rules as Scott and Bruce were doing, but in team games, you can communicate and tell other people what to do even if they have no clue. People forget to write that they were taking turns for someone as I imagine laddida did in that one game, but in general, they did nothing wrong and this thread is absurd.



coming from someone that has already been busted for abusing people accounts :roll: and ya max she was referring to you when she made her post :lol:


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class xxtig12683xx
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby maxatstuy on Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:14 am

your comment only shows your ignorance, I was not busted for cheating, I was blocked for the fear that I may cheat.

and delia was referring to her and I taking turns for phantom in his absence...learn to read or dont talk
User avatar
Field Marshal maxatstuy
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:39 am

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby laddida on Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:21 am

This has been blown outta proportion. Basically it comes down to this. This thread is being abused. I believe if this was done in private with mods that most of the bs posts wouldnt take place and the mods would have a much easier time catching the real abusers and cheaters. There was no intention of any abuse what so ever in these games with delia and me. This thread should not be allowed to be used as a revenge tool. It ruins reputations, all I had was good intentions of helping out delia during a very stressful time and she just couldnt handle taking turns she was exhausted and went to bed and asked me to help. There was no difficult moves or difficult maps. There was not strategic advantage in any of these. This whole thing just needs to end.
General laddida
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:25 am

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby laddida on Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:24 am

Also I would like to add thanks to those who went outta their way to defend us I appreciate it very much :).
General laddida
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:25 am

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby xxtig12683xx on Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:48 am

maxatstuy wrote:your comment only shows your ignorance, I was not busted for cheating, I was blocked for the fear that I may cheat.

and delia was referring to her and I taking turns for phantom in his absence...learn to read or dont talk



sure she was, and thats why she edited her post so fast :roll:


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class xxtig12683xx
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby Fruitcake on Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:10 am

Scott-Land wrote:Cheat threads are nothing but a breeding ground for hate. A place to flame those you dislike. Anyone can and will make a thread just to drag someone's good name through the mud.

The system allows players like emtec to do so because for every one they accuse albeit innocent or not, the admins bust far more real offenders- the collateral damage doesn't outweigh the good that comes from this forum.

We also have to wonder if emtec's strings aren't being pulled here as his new triples partner is Fruit. Perhaps through Fruit's dislike of Delia, it fueled this accusation. I only bring it up because Max and Prank did the same thing by having KG post in a recent cheat thread.


What an odd person you must be to say such a thing Scott, you might have been better taking up this particular issue with me in private. However, you have done it in public, so I shall respond in public.

Where do I ever say I dislike Delia here in public? Have I ever said such to you in private? One has to wonder who is pulling whose strings, or where you are getting your information…or are you gossiping like some old woman Scott? It does seem like that... Furthermore, I am pretty amazed you actually think this way. Am I so clever I have an influence over the normal rational human beings around me here on this site, which is, of course a virtual world? Am I so obviously the sort of individual who would care what you, delia or anyone here really thinks about me? I think my General Congratulations thread should answer that.

For the record, and just so that even you can understand this Scott, after all, you do have some previous for jumping to conclusions. I have not got Delia on foe, yet Delia has put me on foe some time back without having the decency to explain herself. Furthermore, it transpires, anyone who is being trained by me goes on her foe list as well, without ever having played her. Why would this be? Does she really think she is that important that I would expend energy and resources giving her a hard time? Quite the contrary! I have deliberately avoided contact, and crossing her path. Yet she chooses to send me PMs during the period of having me on foe without mentioning such….I fail to understand the mentality of a person who does this.

Now I really do not care if delia is a cheat, or anything else, she is of no importance to me. I am of the opinion her playing skills are poor, and she knows I think this. I have not hidden it from her.

Moving on. I do not ‘control’ 'manipulate’ or anything else. I advise. As such, I advised emtec and widers among others they should play against some of the spanking monkeys as they are generally good players, perhaps you think otherwise, or maybe you think new or junior players who want to learn should be kept in their box so you and others can enjoy a weird privileged position whilst these peasants just press their snotty noses up to the glass wishing they were you. The first time they try to play some one of note, they see they are on foe for absolutely no other reason than the fact that they had played no more than 5 games with me at the time!!!

Now reviewing what emtec has posted, it matters not what any one says, there does seem to have been an oddity occurring. I am pretty damned certain the ruling recently was that a team partner should only take another team partners turns should they be in danger of running out of time. To do otherwise, is against the rules, simple and plain. One can argue around this, and in fact not long ago, this was done. Delia was and is aware of the whole long discussion. The reason for this was that it was started by a BpB member, when she was a member of that clan. This thread kicked off a very long discussion with many contributions, 37 pages and over 500 contributions. The final result was that Twill made the ruling I refer to above. Go and see for yourself Scott.

Moving to what laddida has said, I cannot agree.

Laddida wrote:This has been blown outta proportion. Basically it comes down to this. This thread is being abused. I believe if this was done in private with mods that most of the bs posts wouldnt take place and the mods would have a much easier time catching the real abusers and cheaters. There was no intention of any abuse what so ever in these games with delia and me. This thread should not be allowed to be used as a revenge tool. It ruins reputations, all I had was good intentions of helping out delia during a very stressful time and she just couldnt handle taking turns she was exhausted and went to bed and asked me to help. There was no difficult moves or difficult maps.


This thread has not been abused by anyone except perhaps those springing to your defence laddida. So far, there have been few backing up the OP accusation. I am certain there was no intention of any abuse on your part with regards to taking delias turns. However, the rules are pretty clear. And it does seem that delia has broken them. Now I repeat, there was a long discussion about this, and then end result was a pretty hard and fast ruling by Twill. I do have to ask this though….if delia was ‘exhausted’ as you put it, why did she post and take other turns within the time period? The times are there on record for anyone to see. Here is an example of the times that she was ‘exhausted’ according to emtec's post.

In game number 3121651 Lord Ham (the player before delia) runs out of time at around 6pm (uk time) on the 2nd of September. Now converting this to Australian time, if my memory serves me correct, this translates to 3 o’clock in the morning of the 3rd. At 5.30 am (uk time) or 2.30 in the afternoon (Aus time) of the 3rd, delia posts in the forum. This is but 12 hours later. It is said that she also takes her turns in other games. Yet you say she was exhausted and this necessitated your taking her turn in the game mentioned at near 3pm (UK time) (midnight Aus time), some 9 and a half hours later of the same day, this does beg the question why delia did not take her turn in that game particularly, after all, she posted within the time frame allowable, and took turns in other games.


Quite frankly I cannot be bothered to investigate further, the first example I looked at shows the rules being broken.

In summary, and in my opinion, yes I think emtec, and others, have got it in for delia, in my opinion, understandably so. But then she has shown an odd attitude to those players who feel this way. It matters not to me what she or they do. I resent the implication that I dislike delia. I think she is insane and mad, but I do not have any emotional feelings towards her.

Hope this helps clarify my position, and perhaps the position of some here who may feel certain players run to one set of rules whilst expecting all others to run to another.
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
Colonel Fruitcake
 
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:38 am

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby king achilles on Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:56 am

According to emtec's post in this thread:

September 3 dates:
Game 3112032 = Chat shows: 2008-09-03 14:59:39 - deliaselene: laddida for delia
(deliaselene has still about 20 hours before his/her turn runs out)
Game 3125003 = Chat shows: 2008-09-03 14:44:44 - deliaselene: laddida for delia
(deliaselene has still about 3-4 hours before his/her turn runs out)
Game 3125002 = Chat shows: 2008-09-03 14:56:31 - deliaselene: laddida for delia
(deliaselene has still about 9-10 hours before his/her turn runs out)

posts made in flame wars:
by deliaselene on Wed Sep 03, 2008 5:30 am
by deliaselene on Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:04 am

For these alone, it is pretty evident that laddida appears to be 'too eager' to take turns for deliaselene even there is still enough time that deliaselene could still take his/her turn for him/herself.

Therefore, deliaselene and laddida are blocked from playing together.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
 
Posts: 13259
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby owenshooter on Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:46 am

king achilles wrote: deliaselene and laddida are blocked from playing together.

and from the mountain tops a booming voice spoke, and all was set right in the world...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Lieutenant owenshooter
 
Posts: 13078
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida [blocked]

Postby InkL0sed on Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:23 am

Well, this is disgraceful. This kind of ruling only encourages people to use this forum as a tool to get at their enemies (because it's obvious that that's all this is).
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby Scott-Land on Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:38 am

Fruitcake wrote:In summary, and in my opinion, yes I think emtec, and others, have got it in for delia, in my opinion, understandably so. But then she has shown an odd attitude to those players who feel this way. It matters not to me what she or they do. I resent the implication that I dislike delia. I think she is insane and mad, but I do not have any emotional feelings towards her.



If you can make that assessment that others have it out for Delia- you can certainly forgive me for making the leap that perhaps in passing; you voiced your feelings concerning her insanity to emtec. Yes- it did seem an oddity to me that he would file a complaint without ever playing a game with Delia or Laddi.

My post wasn't directly speaking of this thread Fruit, but my overall opinion of how it can be abused in general. Surely you can see my concern? After all, I just endured it myself.
User avatar
Major Scott-Land
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida [blocked]

Postby Frop on Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:17 am

Yes, it's personal for emtec. This doesn't mean he hasn't made a valid accusation and I believe the verdict itself is proof enough. I'm in the same clan as both blocked players, so do the f-ing math and shut the hell up.
User avatar
Captain Frop
 
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 3:02 pm

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida [blocked]

Postby t-o-m on Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:42 am

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

[Blocked]


:?: :?: :?:
User avatar
Major t-o-m
 
Posts: 2918
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:22 pm

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida [blocked]

Postby Bruceswar on Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:51 am

Edited to be a bit more fair to the mods. So now you tell me if I have 5 mins to post yet not enough time to take my turns that is not legal? Where is all of this BS going to stop. As it stands right now anybody can post anything here and waste the mods time. Yes there is quite a bit of that. I would say 1 of out 3 cases is worth looking into and then the rest are just nothing more than hate, spite, or just plain stupidity.

You also tell me if I am not feeling well, stressed out or anything else. Nobody can take my turns for me, if I decide to post? So you also mean to tell me by laddida following the rules and putting "laddida for delia" you now bust him, but when countless others do not post they take a quick move for a partner in SEQ games, that it is ok because they did not post "X for X" and you cannot prove it?? It happens, as shown by the long debate in GD some time back.

If CC keeps rulings like this up, and bogus people posting in this forum out of spite, hate or any other reason, you are going to drive people away from CC. Mods waste time on cases that are bogus etc, while other cases have to take a back burner to get others out of the way.

It was about 2 weeks ago, Army of Achilles, etc were accused of multis, when all it was, was farming. What about the doodle assassin thread? It people would take the time to look around CC a bit before posting BS, then the mods would have time to look into the more serious cases.

Generally there are only 3 reason's one post here.
1. You just lost or were taken out by a suspected multi. They cannot be this good to beat me, as they are newer!
2. You have hate, dislike and or just want to get back at someone.
3. You do not like the fact a lower rank is playing terrible, so they must be a multi with the other person(s) in the game.


Generally speaking all those can be abused and are as seen by recent post. If mods would start to issue warnings for totally BS threads, then maybe that would help curve it.

Back to the current ruling: Verdict -- Edited - Not one I agree with.

Edited to say I looked quickly at the info and the ruling, and this is not one I would have made.

I understand the mods do the best they can with what they have and I think many of us get wrapped up in the rulings, and forget they do not come to these rulings easy. They do good work overall, but we cannot always agree with a ruling they make. Such is CC.
Last edited by Bruceswar on Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby Fruitcake on Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:03 am

Scott-Land wrote:
Fruitcake wrote:In summary, and in my opinion, yes I think emtec, and others, have got it in for delia, in my opinion, understandably so. But then she has shown an odd attitude to those players who feel this way. It matters not to me what she or they do. I resent the implication that I dislike delia. I think she is insane and mad, but I do not have any emotional feelings towards her.



If you can make that assessment that others have it out for Delia- you can certainly forgive me for making the leap that perhaps in passing; you voiced your feelings concerning her insanity to emtec. Yes- it did seem an oddity to me that he would file a complaint without ever playing a game with Delia or Laddi.

My post wasn't directly speaking of this thread Fruit, but my overall opinion of how it can be abused in general. Surely you can see my concern? After all, I just endured it myself.


Indeed, I do understand. I just wondered why an obviously intelligent chap like you would have made such a statement.

Moving on to the raison d’être of all this and the history, yes I was informed pdq after emtec found he could not enter a game, my response was to check for myself, find that I had been placed on foe as well, inform emtec that this was so, and then when asked why she would do such a thing, my response was simply...'In my opinion, this could have been done for many reasons, however, seeing that others within my 'circle' have also been 'foed', I can only imagine it is because you are as well . Do what you will'.....

I have to say, that if it was me putting people on foe without telling them, without even giving them the opportunity to discourse with me as to why, then I would expect some kind of response and reaction. To do so and expect to continue waltzing along without a care is not just insane, it is also incredibly stupid. Players on my list have contacted me, and I have given utterly honest answers as tig will bear out. I do not create situations, and then run for cover from the reactions. It is fantasy to expect that one can carry out an action, without there being a reaction.

It matters not whether I would do things differently; we are all individual human beings and as such will react in different ways. It is interesting to note, that when emtec first posted in FW about being on her foe list, Delia initially denied she had done so. I can tell you that only served to exacerbate the situation, understandably. As with other posts, she then edited to reverse that statement, however, it was too late, it had been noted. So now, the insult was increased, not only had she put him on foe, but then publicly tried to make him look stupid by saying he was effectively telling an untruth. Now I have to say, if I had done such a thing, I would expect the final reaction to increase at an exponential rate. This is exactly what then happened.

I will also say this. I refute suggestions this is a personal vendetta, at least towards Delia. This is simply the final result of a player thinking they can do what they want, when they want and to whom they want without wishing to be accountable for those actions.
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
Colonel Fruitcake
 
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:38 am

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby maxatstuy on Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:28 pm

xxtig12683xx wrote:
maxatstuy wrote:your comment only shows your ignorance, I was not busted for cheating, I was blocked for the fear that I may cheat.

and delia was referring to her and I taking turns for phantom in his absence...learn to read or dont talk



sure she was, and thats why she edited her post so fast :roll:


-tig


I never had Delias password and she never had mine...People edit and delete posts all the time when the information you are saying is unnecessary or you just dont like how it was phrased. The idea that you would even make the assumption that she must be cheating because she edited a post is a reflection upon your ignorance and your obvious desire to get someone (potentially) in trouble for doing nothing wrong; clearly out of spite.
User avatar
Field Marshal maxatstuy
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:39 am

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby owenshooter on Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:25 am

maxatstuy wrote:The idea that you would even make the assumption that she must be cheating because she edited a post is a reflection upon your ignorance and your obvious desire to get someone (potentially) in trouble for doing nothing wrong; clearly out of spite.

the "potentially" part made me laugh...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Lieutenant owenshooter
 
Posts: 13078
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby xxtig12683xx on Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:37 am

maxatstuy wrote:
xxtig12683xx wrote:
maxatstuy wrote:your comment only shows your ignorance, I was not busted for cheating, I was blocked for the fear that I may cheat.

and delia was referring to her and I taking turns for phantom in his absence...learn to read or dont talk



sure she was, and thats why she edited her post so fast :roll:


-tig


I never had Delias password and she never had mine...People edit and delete posts all the time when the information you are saying is unnecessary or you just dont like how it was phrased. The idea that you would even make the assumption that she must be cheating because she edited a post is a reflection upon your ignorance and your obvious desire to get someone (potentially) in trouble for doing nothing wrong; clearly out of spite.



lol, yea it was totally out of spite :lol: ive never even played a game with her, but i deff had it in for her.


-tig
"there is no avoiding war, it can only be postponed to the advantage of your enemy" NM, 1502
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class xxtig12683xx
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:01 am
Location: Juno Beach, FL

Re: Deliaselene and Laddida

Postby jiminski on Tue Sep 16, 2008 6:55 am

xxtig12683xx wrote:
No confusion, delia already admitted she cant play, lol. I fully believe that laddida takes her turns.

"I must state that I babysit a account for phantomzero as does Max in Canada...

If I have too many games or I dont know the maps Max does the balance"

Thats from a previous thread where she edited that quote real fast when she realized how bad it looked :lol:


-tig



Hey Tig,

well let's at least try to rid ourselves of the shaky evidence from this mate.

the above just says that Delia and Max both share babysitting for phantomzero; if she has too many games (of her own) or does not know the maps (phantomzero is playing on) Max plays those games for phantom.

I am not sure if there is information in between what you quoted in the '...' which would lead to another conclusion but that is the only one i can take from the words you posted above.
Image
User avatar
Major jiminski
 
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
Location: London

Previous

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron