Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
max is gr8 wrote:And it never specifies that you aren't allowed to post during account sitting.
black elk speaks wrote:it was a courtesy. "laddida for delia." in the game chat was laddida letting the other players know that he/she(?) was taking a turn for delia. laddida didn't even need to let the other players know, but did. it was all above board if you ask me.
Frop wrote:black elk speaks wrote:it was a courtesy. "laddida for delia." in the game chat was laddida letting the other players know that he/she(?) was taking a turn for delia. laddida didn't even need to let the other players know, but did. it was all above board if you ask me.
Do you actually read other posts or do you just find yourself drifting in and out of consciousness?
black elk speaks wrote:Frop wrote:black elk speaks wrote:it was a courtesy. "laddida for delia." in the game chat was laddida letting the other players know that he/she(?) was taking a turn for delia. laddida didn't even need to let the other players know, but did. it was all above board if you ask me.
Do you actually read other posts or do you just find yourself drifting in and out of consciousness?
Don't you think that she is innocent until proven guilty? and why the insulting tone! the posts in question, unless i am mistaken, are listed in the posted complaint. all that was ever said was "laddida for delia" by laddida from delia's account. Go back and read it. then apologize to me for being rude.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
black elk speaks wrote:weren't they on the same team in each of those games? thats allowed I think. Delia took some turns for me when I was on vacation. Its called account sitting and it happens a lot, I think. I think emtec should just get over it.
black elk speaks wrote:Frop wrote:black elk speaks wrote:it was a courtesy. "laddida for delia." in the game chat was laddida letting the other players know that he/she(?) was taking a turn for delia. laddida didn't even need to let the other players know, but did. it was all above board if you ask me.
Do you actually read other posts or do you just find yourself drifting in and out of consciousness?
Don't you think that she is innocent until proven guilty? and why the insulting tone! the posts in question, unless i am mistaken, are listed in the posted complaint. all that was ever said was "laddida for delia" by laddida from delia's account. Go back and read it. then apologize to me for being rude.
jiminski wrote:black elk speaks wrote:Frop wrote:black elk speaks wrote:it was a courtesy. "laddida for delia." in the game chat was laddida letting the other players know that he/she(?) was taking a turn for delia. laddida didn't even need to let the other players know, but did. it was all above board if you ask me.
Do you actually read other posts or do you just find yourself drifting in and out of consciousness?
Don't you think that she is innocent until proven guilty? and why the insulting tone! the posts in question, unless i am mistaken, are listed in the posted complaint. all that was ever said was "laddida for delia" by laddida from delia's account. Go back and read it. then apologize to me for being rude.
hehe.. right chaps, fun though this is - Frop was saying that you had not understood his post.
This Case can be very quickly put to rest by proving a consistent pattern of Delia forum attendance at the same time of Laddida playing as a babysitter.
This is not allowed; If someone can post consistently then they can play consistently!
1 or 2 contemporary posts may not be enough to prove a pattern of abuse. Sometimes people come back early and go straight to the forum before playing or instructing the babysitter to stop.
I have been in a situation where i went to play my game to find the start button being pressed in front of my eye.. that is what it is to have ones very own poltergeist!
So to move forward we need evidence of Deliaselenes paralleled forum posts and with babysat account please original poster.
Curmudgeonx wrote:black elk speaks wrote:weren't they on the same team in each of those games? thats allowed I think. Delia took some turns for me when I was on vacation. Its called account sitting and it happens a lot, I think. I think emtec should just get over it.black elk speaks wrote:Frop wrote:black elk speaks wrote:it was a courtesy. "laddida for delia." in the game chat was laddida letting the other players know that he/she(?) was taking a turn for delia. laddida didn't even need to let the other players know, but did. it was all above board if you ask me.
Do you actually read other posts or do you just find yourself drifting in and out of consciousness?
Don't you think that she is innocent until proven guilty? and why the insulting tone! the posts in question, unless i am mistaken, are listed in the posted complaint. all that was ever said was "laddida for delia" by laddida from delia's account. Go back and read it. then apologize to me for being rude.
Who is being rude here Black ELk/The_Lion? It seems that you are the one escalating the acrimony here . . .
There can be account sitting abuse, especially when a person is available to take their turns and chooses not to . . .
Anarkistsdream wrote:Emtec just has it out for Delia...
Why is that?
black elk speaks wrote:Anyway, still waiting on that apology frop. this isn't flamewars.
Frop wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Emtec just has it out for Delia...
Why is that?
He created some thread earlier on about being on her foe list without ever having played her. He's definitely after her though and there's no end to his creativity.black elk speaks wrote:Anyway, still waiting on that apology frop. this isn't flamewars.
I apologize for pointing out your shortcomings, I should have kept this on topic.
Frop wrote:Don't be silly, why wouldn't you take your own turns when you're posting on the forum? I'm confused.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Frop wrote:Could you link us to some of the posts she supposedly made while laddida was taking her turns?
emtec wrote:The rules say that a team mate should only take a turn if their partner could be running out of time don’t they.
Stroop wrote:Or perhaps it's simply Laddida posting on the wrong account on accident?emtec wrote:The rules say that a team mate should only take a turn if their partner could be running out of time don’t they.
Or perhaps they were just browsing the forum a bit waiting for Delia to almost run out of time so people won't think they're doing something against the rules.
clapper011 wrote:there seems to be some confusion, but i do not believe that delia or ladida or even gimil for that matter are guilty of cheating. Babysitting , well he posted that he was taking her turns, thats what he is suppose to do, regardless of what she was doing, he clearly stated that he was taking her turns. there have been many times that a person cannot actually take a turn, be it tired, or page not loading, or grease monkey not working , etc. does that mean they are cheaters? no not at all.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users