happysadfun wrote:Everyone has faith. You, backglass, have faith in the world, and science.
You sound like Jay. I have no "faith" in Science as Science does not require faith. I believe in people though...if thats what you mean. People can be (and are) good without religions.
happysadfun wrote:The Bible is straightfoward.
Of course it is. Thats why it has be re-written/translated/altered and thousands of wildly different religions based on it. Because it is so clear and straightforward.
happysadfun wrote:It requires one assumption- that there is a God.
Agreed. You know what they say about assuming.
happysadfun wrote:Science requires many assumptions, with hypotheses based on hypotheses that assume that this or that hypothesis is correct... Which is simpler? Which one requires the least assumptions? You tell me.
I see. So because Science of any kind requires that things actually be proven, which does take time & effort, it is somehow wrong? And because all you have to do is close your eyes, click your heels and pray (which IS much simpler I will agree) the belief in gods, angels, demons, fairys and trolls is right?
Makes perfect sense to me.