knightscross and tle105 [cleared and noted]

[Attila8]

Accused:

• knightscross
• tle105

The accused are suspected of:

• Being Multis
• Having a secret alliance

Game number(s):

• Game 2402648

Comments:
knightscross continuously attacked me (and others earlier in the game) from South Australia. He ignored tle105 even though he held Western Australia and the Northern Terriority.

In fact, knightscross did not attack tel105 until the second to last round and tel105 only attacked knightscross three times in 11 rounds despite sharing two undefended borders.

Both players only had one army on every territory (It was fog of war but in round 9 I used my bonus to take away his bonuses. I crossed from NSW through SA, NT to WA. Every territory I saw only had one army. Why didn't the experienced knightscross (1000+ games) take out tel105's bonus WA and NT bonuses?

tle105 played immediately after knightscross. There is hardly any time between goes. In 7 rounds the gap was less than twenty minutes, 4 were under an hour and the other was 1.5hrs – for players in the US and UK.

Looking at their game history they have played in the same game on at least 21 occassions (based on the first few pages of my search).

[king achilles]

knightscross and tle105 are cleared of being multis. If you can show a number of games where they have made suspicious moves to benefit the other, we shall consider blocking them. Every move an opponent makes can be suspect, so if it is just speculation, that would not be enough. So there really has to be a series of moves that they are doing something malicious or in some sort of secret diplomacy. Until then, if it is just one game, then this report is noted for future reference.