gregnorg-youngpm [noted]

by **dogshow** on Mon May 19, 2008 7:20 pm

Accused:

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Having a secret alliance

Game number(s):

Game 2432953

by **king achilles** on Mon May 19, 2008 8:22 pm

youngpm and gregnorg are not multis with each other. As for a secret alliance, this is noted. We leave it up to you to leave a feedback about it, supported with facts from the game.

by **dogshow** on Tue May 20, 2008 1:37 pm

How can they not be deemed suspicious with 30 seconds between turns

by **lancehoch** on Tue May 20, 2008 4:09 pm

dogshow wrote:How can they not be deemed suspicious with 30 seconds between turns

That is why it is noted. If you can show that this is not an isolated game where this happens then the hunters might block the two accounts from playing together.

by **dogshow** on Tue May 20, 2008 7:18 pm

Thank you for the clarification

by **youngpm** on Thu May 22, 2008 1:56 pm

Yeah we have a secret alliance, that's why we've been attaching each other pretty much from the get go in this game. Dogshow, take your whiny paranoia somewhere else, no one wants to hear you bitch about it here or in the game log.

by **gregnorg** on Wed May 28, 2008 12:19 pm

I would have to argue that dogshow's behaviour is more indicative of a secret alliance than mine. While I have attacked youngpm repeatedly at times losing hundreds of armies, dogshow only attacked youngpm twice. HE holed himself up in the castle and only left it when it appeared to attacke me, when I could possibly defeat youngpm. After I was beaten down, he then reholed himself in his castle while youngpm took over the map. This sealed the game in youngpm's favor.

There is no secret alliance. There is no behaviour to suggest a secret alliance. We just play from the same office so we know when the other persons turn has ended.