dagdogdag and chaddamus [noted]

[friendly1]

Accused:

• dagdogdag
• chaddamus

The accused are suspected of:

• Having a secret alliance

Game number(s):

• Game 2475280

Comments:
In this game myself and both players got into some verbal jousting, however in turn 6 dagdogdag quite clearly attacked to both kill any army locations i had which chaddamus could not reach, while also breaking any bonus's the fourth player (naticus) had ( at this time chaddamus was clearly leading the game). This was so blatantly obvious a move I looked into the game history of dagdogdag and chaddamus (172 games) I do not claim these two have done this before, however in this game it is very easy to see that dagdogdag deliberately placed chaddamus in a position to win. After turn 6, i made it clear in chat an accusation would be posted, so both players should have the chance to respond here

Edit- I should note that in no way did Chaddamus act as a partner, he was simply the recipient of a walkthrough victory after dagdogdag expended the majority of his armies to eliminate me and reduce Naticus's bonus's to zero

friendly1

[dagdogdag]

I have no idea what this guy is accusing me of. He started mouthing off from the start of the game because he was being attacked by all of the players in weaker positions. In fact, he didn't even come after me during the game. The person who attacked me the most was the very same person he accuses me of colluding with. Friendly1 ain't so friendly. He's just a little sore, that's all. Won't play him again.

Rebuttal: See above...this guy accuses dagdogdag and chaddamus as having a secret alliance, and then he edits his note indicating that he in no way accuses chaddamus as being complicit in the pact. I don't understand! This guy can't be serious? Poor form buddy, poor form!

[friendly1]

I have no idea what this guy is accusing me of. He started mouthing off from the start of the game because he was being attacked by all of the players in weaker positions. In fact, he didn't even come after me during the game. The person who attacked me the most was the very same person he accuses me of colluding with. Friendly1 ain't so friendly. He's just a little sore, that's all. Won't play him again.

Rebuttal: See above...this guy accuses dagdogdag and chaddamus as having a secret alliance, and then he edits his note indicating that he in no way accuses chaddamus as being complicit in the pact. I don't understand! This guy can't be serious? Poor form buddy, poor form!

LOL, I'll reply rather than edit so my post doesnt change as I see that bothers you

First, I'm not sore, Chaddamus had me clearly beat in the game, and likely would have won without your help. I edited to make that clear.

You gifted the game to your friend, and so blatantly so I made a report here - the first one I've made in over 1500 games so yes I'd have to say I am serious. In your games playing together its clear you mostly play as partners or against each other which is cool, however you cant play as partners or gift a game to your friend when you play singles, and your moves on turn 6 are so obviously done to create an easy elimination of me for cards and to reduce the fourth player in armies and bonus's its a complete no brainer what your intent was. If I was "sore" about this, I would have left you feedback saying so. Instead I simply made a report here, and I doubt there will be any actions taken.However if you do this again this form is easily looked up.

And yes, we won't play any more games together, thats mutual

friendly1

[king achilles]

This report is noted.

For the record, Chaddamus and dagdogdag are not multis with each other but have played many games together. Now, when you play singles, it is easy for others to suspect either one of you favoring each other, especially when you already have a history of games together and when they do not understand a turn or an attack on them.

[dagdogdag]

Now I understand. I reviewed friendly1's feedback and it appears that his negative feedbacks generally state the he has made ridiculous moves in games with the result of giving the game away to a player, at the expense of the player leaving the negative feedback for friendly1. In his feedback log replies, you can see that he is always very rude about it and uses foul language. Indeed, in my game with him he was rude from the start, and continued to berate me because I was the weakest player on the board and tried to kill him and do some damage to another player, knowing full well that it would be the beginning of the end for me. Soon thereafter, he lost the game. In fact, he is classically passive-aggressive. He lost the game to me, and found a reason to justify his loss in accusing me of cheating. I run into people in these games who are just bonkers!