Gabon X Feedback Abuse [Closed]

[Dancing Mustard]

So Soloman is a multi then?

Always good to find that kind of thing out.

[Soloman]

So Soloman is a multi then?

Always good to find that kind of thing out.

naw he is just another person in a larger conspiricy they are mad that there target was proven innicoent and given the chance to review and display the hypocrisy. His goal was to co-opt this thread and to take it away from the point which is Gabon -X is abusing the Feedback system and should suffer a ban but nice try at derailment...

[Dancing Mustard]

The lady doth protest too much I fear...

[Soloman]

Bump

[GabonX]

Nobody gives a shit

[GabonX]

If you want to break down my deleted feedback we can do that but you have to take the initiative. Somewhat of a difficult thing to do because you don't know the background on any of them.

The only one that violates the feedback guidelines as posted is in pending with E-Tickets. The others were deleted for reasons which are not described as being inappropriate reasons to leave feedback anywhere on the site. Tons of players here are dissatisfied with the way feedback is run and I think it is largely due to the ambiguity as to what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate feedback.

I'm not at all concerned with your assertion that you can proclaim that I have broken a rule and then and dictate what the punishment should be. Things just don't work that way here but it does illustrate just how much of a pompous ass you are. Also, your statistic that over 10% of my feedback has been deleted by moderators is inaccurate. Like I said before, after a certain amount of time, unless a player was particularly poor in conduct in my eyes, I delete negative feedback. If I go on to delete all of my negatives you could claim that 100% of my negatives were in violation of CC policy which is grossly inaccurate.

I think treefiddy did a good job of showing the ridiculousness of this thread...

"Here's how I read your thread on GabonX:

Hey mods, I just want to make sure that the people who are deleting the feedbacks are aware of these deleted feedbacks."

The fact that you were willing to let this thread die and then only brought it back when I stated my opinion in an unrelated thread shows a kind of vindictive immaturity on the other end of the wire. Hypocrisy is a topic which you frequently bring up here regardless of whether it has any relevant context to what you are discussing. On that topic I find it particularly amusing that someone who seems to pride himself on his christian faith seems to deviate so far from the "turn the other cheek" philosophy that your chosen prophet supported. You don't always need to have the last word on everything. Maybe you should try practicing the tenants of your faith instead of just trying to gain respect by preaching them online.

[Soloman]

If you want to break down my deleted feedback we can do that but you have to take the initiative. Somewhat of a difficult thing to do because you don't know the background on any of them.

The only one that violates the feedback guidelines as posted is in pending with E-Tickets. The others were deleted for reasons which are not described as being inappropriate reasons to leave feedback anywhere on the site. Tons of players here are dissatisfied with the way feedback is run and I think it is largely due to the ambiguity as to what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate feedback.

I'm not at all concerned with your assertion that you can proclaim that I have broken a rule and then and dictate what the punishment should be. Things just don't work that way here but it does illustrate just how much of a pompous ass you are. Also, your statistic that over 10% of my feedback has been deleted by moderators is inaccurate. Like I said before, after a certain amount of time, unless a player was particularly poor in conduct in my eyes, I delete negative feedback. If I go on to delete all of my negatives you could claim that 100% of my negatives were in violation of CC policy which is grossly inaccurate.

I think treefiddy did a good job of showing the ridiculousness of this thread...

"Here's how I read your thread on GabonX:

Hey mods, I just want to make sure that the people who are deleting the feedbacks are aware of these deleted feedbacks."

The fact that you were willing to let this thread die and then only brought it back when I stated my opinion in an unrelated thread shows a kind of vindictive immaturity on the other end of the wire. Hypocrisy is a topic which you frequently bring up here regardless of whether it has any relevant context to what you are discussing. On that topic I find it particularly amusing that someone who seems to pride himself on his christian faith seems to deviate so far from the "turn the other cheek" philosophy that your chosen prophet supported. You don't always need to have the last word on everything. Maybe you should try practicing the tenants of your faith instead of just trying to gain respect by preaching them online.

I do not advocate turn the other cheek I believe that he who left as the lamb will come back as the lion and all his Disciples should do the same I bumped both of my unanswered posts so please do nottry and make an issue I had almost forgot about your thread but thankfully you reminded me . Yours is the easiest and most clean cut case you habitually abuse the feedback system and would have more deleted feedbacks if the people just contested them so say what you will it does nto change the facts of your abuse...

[treefiddy]

I had almost forgot about your thread but thankfully you reminded me .

You were well aware of your accusation on Gabon before he posted again in the JR thread. You stated such at 6:15am this morning. Then I referenced it at 9:30am, and you replied 3 times after that. It wasn't until Gabon posted in that thread, again calling you out on something, that you decided to come back here and bump the thread.

[Soloman]

I had almost forgot about your thread but thankfully you reminded me .

You were well aware of your accusation on Gabon before he posted again in the JR thread. You stated such at 6:15am this morning. Then I referenced it at 9:30am, and you replied 3 times after that. It wasn't until Gabon posted in that thread, again calling you out on something, that you decided to come back here and bump the thread.

wow nice observation and accurate I just did not bother to check its positionat the time then I decided to look and saw sadly it had elapsed from the main page so I borught it to forfront since it was such a great topic of discussion thank you for helping to remind me.

[GabonX]

As much as I hate to admit it I think I owe you an apology. It was unnecessary for me to bring the issue of faith into this topic and it really has no relevance here. As perplexed as I am by your response to my post, theology has nothing to do with what was being discussed and I shouldn't have brought it up.

With that said, I still think that your conduct here has been very poor. Playing a series of three player games where you or your brother wins in every single one of them is suspicious but forgivable because you now play in teams. What I find so poor about your conduct is the way you treat other players and how you seem to be deaf to their criticism. Your signature, which states that people can only choose to agree with you or be wrong implying that you are never wrong, seems to sum up your attitude here and many people are fed up with it.

Also, anyone who would like a more in depth analysis of one of my deleted feedbacks may be interested in reading my response here...

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=51397

[Soloman]

As much as I hate to admit it I think I owe you an apology. It was unnecessary for me to bring the issue of faith into this topic and it really has no relevance here. As perplexed as I am by your response to my post, theology has nothing to do with what was being discussed and I shouldn't have brought it up.

With that said, I still think that your conduct here has been very poor. Playing a series of three player games where you or your brother wins in every single one of them is suspicious but forgivable because you now play in teams. What I find so poor about your conduct is the way you treat other players and how you seem to be deaf to their criticism. Your signature, which states that people can only choose to agree with you or be wrong implying that you are never wrong, seems to sum up your attitude here and many people are fed up with it.

Also, anyone who would like a more in depth analysis of one of my deleted feedbacks may be interested in reading my response here...

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=51397

While I love the way you attempt to redirect and avoid the topic by bringing up a false accusation against me this thread is about you, but since you brought it up you ever take the time to review these games where my brother and I were accused? You notice how in quite a few of them one of us takes out the other early on at 1st opportunity and the game continues many rounds past? I mean in a 3 or four man game which are the ones we have been accused in a lot can change in a if some one is eliminated early in a few one of us was the 1st eliminated. basic logic would show if we were helping 1 another neither of us would ever be eliminated 1st because in that small agame it is easy to forsee and defend the other and we definitely would not attack each other till the others could not attack worth while.

Those points are neglected in the lack of logic used on that accusation noone bothers to actually read the logs on the games they just look at the end and do not recognise that the means is where the evidence to convict or exhonerate lies. Now back on to topic Gabon you are luckty more feedbacks hacve not been deleted after reviewing all of your negatives I found 4 more that should have been deleted also,your only saving grace is the person did not contest so the feedback mods never reviewed them. I suggest you go back and reword them to where they are fully game related and not retalittory before the mods do take a look at all of your feedback left...

[Furio]

My two cents -

First off - Let me say that I've had a run in or two with GabonX. He'll certainly claim that everything I say here is because of those run ins. It's not.

GabonX does three things with a consistency that is unmatched on the CC -

1 - He negs anyone who negs him first
2 - He re-negs that player once his feedback is deleted
3 - He ALWAYS, ALWAYS challenges his negative feedback.

The moderators are busy, and most of the time, they just remove the challenged feedback and that's the end of it. That's how a total ass-hat of a player only has three negs against him. I had to resubmit my negative twice, with a long note of explanation to the moderator, just to get it to stick. I imagine that most players don't bother with that, and maybe I shouldn't have either. It's just that I spotted the same behavior set that Saloman has, and there is a principal involved.

Thanks to Salomon for bringing this to light. Even if nothing comes of it, GabonX should know that if everyone on the CC was the obfuscating, double-dealing and hypocritical windbag that he is, the site would die.

[Soloman]

bump

[Dancing Mustard]

Thank you Salmon.

[Soloman]

Thank you Salmon.

LOL I do what I can I love the evolution of my name lol

[Soloman]

My two cents -

First off - Let me say that I've had a run in or two with GabonX. He'll certainly claim that everything I say here is because of those run ins. It's not.

GabonX does three things with a consistency that is unmatched on the CC -

1 - He negs anyone who negs him first
2 - He re-negs that player once his feedback is deleted
3 - He ALWAYS, ALWAYS challenges his negative feedback.

The moderators are busy, and most of the time, they just remove the challenged feedback and that's the end of it. That's how a total ass-hat of a player only has three negs against him. I had to resubmit my negative twice, with a long note of explanation to the moderator, just to get it to stick. I imagine that most players don't bother with that, and maybe I shouldn't have either. It's just that I spotted the same behavior set that Saloman has, and there is a principal involved.

Thanks to Salomon for bringing this to light. Even if nothing comes of it, GabonX should know that if everyone on the CC was the obfuscating, double-dealing and hypocritical windbag that he is, the site would die.

Gabon you must be excited about the new system, now this issue will be null and void ...I just hope you do not abuse the new system as you have done on the old...

[Frop]

Soloman, just because I'm curious what you'll come up with on me, I hereby fully support GibbonX and declare you a first class monkeylover.

[GabonX]

This was clearly posted in retalition, that's why no one looked at it yet.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=50357&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=105


All these things paint a picture...

[Soloman]

This was clearly posted in retalition, that's why no one looked at it yet.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=50357&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=105


All these things paint a picture...

READ YOUR OWN FEED BACK BEFORE YOU TALK ABOUT RETALIATION BUDDY YOU HAVE A RECORD OF GROSS ABUSE OF THE FEEDBACK SYSTEM PERIOD NO IF ANDS AND BUTS ABOUT IT...

[Frop]

I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE SCREAMING ABOUT!

[GabonX]

He just wants us to know how serious he is

[Soloman]

here is a list of some additional feedbacks left by the hypocrite Gabon that should have been deleted due to either not being factual or just plain retalitory and petty...

"Negative Horrible player, threw the game to a third player who admitted such to me in a positive feedback. I certainly won't play him again.
STORMCHASER's response: I didn't throw anything, just didn't have the rolls. You are one sore loser 1587027 STORMCHASER ( 85-5 )
2008-02-03 21:30:29 "

Negative 2008-01-15 06:43:01 - smiffi: xan - shall we team ? 2008-01-15 06:44:03 - smiffi: in fact Xan and general leon - we should all concentrate our attacks on GabonX 2008-01-15 06:44:18 - smiffi: agreed? This was on the second round in a four player game that I started.
smiffi's response: cmon man - lol it was just diplomacy 1587026 smiffi ( 3-3 )
2008-01-25 14:19:11

Negative Sat on his armies when he should have been helping to bring down the strongest player. He thought he would be able to take South America but instead he gave the game away. If you're in a game and one player has a clear advantage, expect this guy to give your game to that player.
steve2414's response: Sorry my strategy didn't increase your chances of winning. Go outside virgin. 1587028 steve2414 ( 16-4 )
2008-01-19 03:34:59

with the new feedback system hopefully Gabon will get past his retalitory and petty feedbacks that have resulted in so many deletions but we will see if this pattern of abuse continues...

[xxtig12683xx]

Dude, what do you care, the feedback system is getting changed anyways, so all those negs will be rendered useless.

and do you have nothing better to do with your life? Maybe you should spend more time with your 5 kids than making useless posts all over the place...i mean seriously every time i turn around in a forum you've commented on basically EVERY topic.

get a life.


-tig

[Soloman]

Dude, what do you care, the feedback system is getting changed anyways, so all those negs will be rendered useless.

and do you have nothing better to do with your life? Maybe you should spend more time with your 5 kids than making useless posts all over the place...i mean seriously every time i turn around in a forum you've commented on basically EVERY topic.

get a life.


-tig

I am posting about abuse but if you want to stalk and flame go ahead...

[GabonX]

This whole thread is a stalk and flame..
..I'm not particularly concerned with it.