Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Twill wrote:You have seriously crossed a line on the reminisco trolling front.
Kemmler wrote:King Conan does not exist, presumably he's been banned areayd. I think he's the only one
delboy01 wrote:Hmmm, BM and hammertime do play a lot of games together and they seem to win a high percentage of games they are in together. Will await the admin views with interest.
hammertime65 wrote:The OP is a new player that is getting wiped out in the game in question and so is whining there and now here. Pathetic. Any alliances in the game have been annnounced by all players including the one he made, no secrets there at ALL. I also do not know any of the other players any better then I know the OP. I am in multiple games with many other players at the same time as we appear to have all been looking for games at the same time. Players such as Michigan Navy, Verbatim666, Wooddruff, etc. It's not a conspiracy, it's coincidence. I have informed the game you are in OP about your claims here so likely a lot of veteran players will now come here to coment no your sad attempt at revenge for a game loss...like I said, pathetic.
Bones2484 wrote:I've always "enjoyed" how BrutalMaggot abuses the feedback system. He will leave a negative before the other person (when he knows one is incoming) and then respond to the feedback left on his profile as being "retaliatory".
What a tool.
chakon wrote:There may be some validity to this thread...
I was in the same game and very early on, BrutalMaggot had control of Oceania and hammertime65 had control of the Far East (right next to each other).
At one point BrutalMaggot had I believe 7 armies (a good number at that point) immediately next to Taiwan (hammertime65's) with 1 army on it. BrutalMaggot did NOT attack the 1 army on Taiwan to keep hammertime65 from receiving his bonus for the Far East.
I called BrutalMaggot out on this in chat, and hammertime65 stuck up for BrutalMaggot's actions. (which I found to be rather odd) There were no alliances posted regarding them at this point. But after pointing this out they very quickly announced an alliance.
Some may figure that it was just an oversight on BrutalMaggot's part, however I believe someone ranked as a Captain doesn't make those elementary oversights very often.
They will try (and did in chat) that I was upset because I got attacked by BrutalMaggot...however that is not the case. At one point I had most of North America and had no problem being attacked, as it was the right move to make. However this was not even the same round as the proposed possible secret alliance tactics explained earlier.
I am still new here, and am not planning on leaving neg feedback, as I am unsure if it is warranted...however I did want to put some clarity to this issue.
LycanWarrior wrote:In Game 2154187, hammertime65 posted this:
hammertime65: I agree with red, the enemy of my enemy and all that, lol. Deal green
hammertime65: eerrr, yellow, I'm green doh
Yellow is King Conan. These two seem to mistake their colors often.
LycanWarrior wrote:delboy01 wrote:Hmmm, BM and hammertime do play a lot of games together and they seem to win a high percentage of games they are in together. Will await the admin views with interest.
Well, adobus (green) has also been in quite a few games with hammertime (orange), so that could be something or nothing.
jalen45 wrote:this is like the millionith complaint about brutal maggot, why hasnt this guy been banned yet?
Users browsing this forum: JBlombier