qwert wrote:Gimil all ready understand in 2-3 pages before.
I dont recall saying anything about the naming of territoires.
Moderator: Cartographers
qwert wrote:Gimil all ready understand in 2-3 pages before.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
qwert wrote:
Gimil all ready understand in 2-3 pages before.
I dont recall saying anything about the naming of territoires.
by AndyDufresne on Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:38 pm
I don't pay attention to titles.
by oaktown on Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:52 am
So let me get this straight - the unit sizes have nothing to do with gameplay. They are just there for territory naming purposes, right? if so,let's move this map on.
qwert wrote:Gimil
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Gimil
Qwerts my life this week was sent to me 1st class from hell. Ill look at this the second I get a chance to breath
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil
Ok qwerts the only problem I have is with the legends. The text doesnt seem to be centered at alot of bits. Also the air-bourn text spacing is too big and needs decreased since it doesnt look good. Other than that:
I was just wondering if there should be a connection between BR 29 and US VIII?
The other thing I noticed is that the SDZ and SLZ aren't that clear; is there any way that these two can be made to 'jump out' a little bit more? Perhaps by changing the label colour to green or something??
qwert wrote:
MrBenn
... also, there are only 3 armour territories down there, making it harder to get that bonus if you're trying to build from the bottom...
i only mentioned the possibility of a BR-29 and US-VIII link, as otherwise the two Allied areas are not connected. I'm happy with it if that is intended - I'm just thinking of people who may be confused by the Belgium border, which goes between the two...
MrBenn
qwert wrote:Now its Andy turn
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
In case your havent notice there more pressing issues at hand
Give the monkey time.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users