Moderator: Cartographers
Sir. Ricco wrote:I don't know how you did it but you improved on the last update. This map, in my opinion, has the est graphics of any map i have seen on CC.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:but I think you missed the ball on this attempt RJ
I like your thinking catfishjohnson. You are exactly correct. however, I'll give it a few days before I do anything else drastic.CatfishJohnson wrote:The thing is man, the colder water is the blue/purple it is, and iceland is in a very norther region so the ocean surronding it is extrememly cold, yet the water INSIDE, is super heated by geothermal energy so i think a inbetween blue green OR maybe a darkblue purplish...
The Viking wrote:Looks great, though I think you should either have the Icelandic characters (ö, þ, æ, etc.) everywhere appropriate or nowhere at all.
RjBeals wrote:The Viking wrote:Looks great, though I think you should either have the Icelandic characters (ö, þ, æ, etc.) everywhere appropriate or nowhere at all.
Yes I thought so as well. I know the xml can handle the Icelandic characters, but i'm not sure if the general playing cc'ers will go for it. A lot of people (including myself) don't know how to pronounce those characters, so it's kind of hard to verbalize in your head your attack plans. But, those characters are true to Iceland, and that should be considered as well. I'm leaning towards the normal 26 english characters though - I think there's actually a rule about all map names being in english?
RjBeals wrote:I like your thinking catfishjohnson. You are exactly correct. however, I'll give it a few days before I do anything else drastic.CatfishJohnson wrote:The thing is man, the colder water is the blue/purple it is, and iceland is in a very norther region so the ocean surronding it is extrememly cold, yet the water INSIDE, is super heated by geothermal energy so i think a inbetween blue green OR maybe a darkblue purplish...
AndyDufresne wrote:Agreed with the above post...that is what I voted for.
--Andy
Herakilla wrote:srry for not responding before
maybe if there is one singularly prosperous location over the others you can make it a bonus by itself and then make it start neutral thus bringing you down to 35 territories and avoid that disaster with 2 and 3 player games
Herakilla wrote:Herakilla wrote:srry for not responding before
maybe if there is one singularly prosperous location over the others you can make it a bonus by itself and then make it start neutral thus bringing you down to 35 territories and avoid that disaster with 2 and 3 player games
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users