Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
qwert wrote:cairnswk Posted: 06 Mar 2008 18:49 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qwert...i make suggestion for you for the Alps and Roma...
Cairnswk,dont tell me that you also not see clear Roma box,and Alpes Box. Its look that aim realy retarded here
First of you have three Latin numbers in map I. II. and III. and if you have a so small IQ,you will very fast know where is where, i realy can not belive that people will not know what these boxes present.
Now you have many maps who is far more complicated then these two boxes.
When i work in Western Front,some guys(i dont want to write names)tell me that i will have many complains about British bombardment,but when map quenched, nothing hepend,because people is not stupid, and very fast understand what is what,and what terittory can bombard and what can not bombard.
I know that Lone is smart person,and that he want to create Issue,with something what is 100% simple,then some maps,and that he very good understand what Roma box present,what Alpes provinces box present,and how these working.
qwert wrote:FreeMan10,people its much smart then you think.
Like i say,now you have several map who is much complicate then these map,like VAterlo(its interesting map but its very complicate),and i dont find in map,that when you stand on artilery,you can not move nowhere from these teritories,and these can be very fatal,for players who dont know these.
I see that you've done that, but really, it wasn't that clear to me when I first looked at it. I'm pretty good with maps, but I was lost on this one.qwert wrote:Well i put all latin numbers in these three alpes provinces,and also add Italy on Alpes Boxes.
FreeMan,all map must be in same shape,Now you have many indicators for Alpes Box(Numbers in teritories,All surounded teritories(Italy,Narbonensis..))There is no chance to miss these three teritories. emphasis added
cairnswk wrote:That is fine then. Do your own thing! ... If you don't want to take others suggestions to improve your map then so be it. You fall on your own sword.
Cairnswk
Qwert. That is fine then. Do your own thing! We are not comparing my Waterloo map here. If you don't want to take others suggestions to improve your map then so be it. You fall on your own sword.
What are the three fingers on the bottom on the Alps beside the blue sea area...under III ALPS MARITIMAE...that looks really confusing....and unnecessary.
qwert wrote:I know that Lone is smart person,and that he want to create Issue,with something what is 100% simple,then some maps,and that he very good understand what Roma box present,what Alpes provinces box present,and how these working.
Lone,Prophet
and your borders look a bit pixaletd
about the zoom is there a reason why it has such a weird shape?
Gozar Posted: 07 Mar 2008 23:57 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I do not quite understand how the Roma box fits in.
Do you attack into it from Italia? And if so, do you have to go through praetorians first?
InkL0sed Posted: 08 Mar 2008 00:04 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think those coins should be reduced in size, if not removed completely. The map is already so cluttered, they only add to the confusion, in my opinion.
InkL0sed wrote:I think those coins should be reduced in size, if not removed completely. The map is already so cluttered, they only add to the confusion, in my opinion.
qwert wrote:Cairnswk,i can understand yours style of making map,and i give you support for these map style,but i dont mine if you not supporting mine style of making maps,these is yours right. All map makers have some artistic things on map,and it will be ridiculos if all maps have same style. If you think that Frazzle paper,look like three fingers and will be confusing for players,i think that these artistic view on Frazzle paper will definitly not create some big confusing on map,but if people on play start complaining on these Frazzle paper,then i will imediatly change these,and i give you honor word.
Mine appology if i say something bad for yours Vaterlo map,i will never again speak about all yours map again.
I don't know what frazzle paper is...what is it?
-Frazzle paper-
-Heckle-
-Scrap of paper-
-detach,particle,fragment,inconstantly,shape,style,fragment.
Lets try to assemble these phrase.
These is frazzle paper,i mean scrap of paper,who have inconstantly shape.
qwert wrote:I don't know what frazzle paper is...what is it?-Frazzle paper-
-Heckle-
-Scrap of paper-
-detach,particle,fragment,inconstantly,shape,style,fragment.
Lets try to assemble these phrase.
These is frazzle paper,i mean scrap of paper,who have inconstantly shape.
Well i realy want to explane,but its look that i can not find english words for these Artistic style,or how these write.
hulmey wrote:Sometimes, as it learn qwerty, that less is better.
Lol, carin's
and i encourage you to speak on my maps, i value your input when you give it whether i decide to take it or not.
qwert wrote:and i encourage you to speak on my maps, i value your input when you give it whether i decide to take it or not.
When i mention yours Waterlo map,aim not thinking nothing bad,i play one time,and i reinforce army on artilery,but when i try to move army on other terittory,i sudenly find that i can not move army,but i dont find any warning about that. Maybe these whas your atention to people learn how to play,without any explanation,and belive me aim very good learn these trap,and second game i won,because mine oponent dont know these and reinforce all army on artilery. Thing what i want to say is that these is yours style of map,and i thinking that its will be unfair from me to give you sugestion to change yours recognise style,to something what you dont like. Aim only one time give sugestion in yours BAttle gazala map,about German Unit symbol,what you apply.
I understand now. But do you think "scrap of paper" look is appropriate for good looking map?
qwert wrote:I understand now. But do you think "scrap of paper" look is appropriate for good looking map?
Well if i can find some original Ancient scrap of paper,these will be great,but these is mine artistic view on Ancient Scrap of paper.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users