Moderator: Community Team
Ryan32's feedback wrote:He is a marginal player with a huge attitude and a big mouth. Even when the game was handed to him, he couldn't pull it out of the bag. I took a gamble, a "RISK" if you will, and came up short in this game. Since my risk didn't benefit Ryan, he continued to use insults and profanity in chat to try to annoy me. If you read the chat from this game, you can decide for yourself who is the one who's upset. He has a track record of playing newbies 1 on 1 to score easy, but low point victories. I'd love to play this guy in a 1 on 1 game to show him just how "good" he is against a skilled player.
Ryan32's response: Play me i will win. The game was never never handed to me by anychance. Lol theres a diference between a moronic move and a risk. Hethink africa is easier to defend then australlia. This is primarilly negative feedback for me leaving him 1. So play me!!FOOL!
Sir. Ricco wrote:I think this needs moved to Call Outs.
That's too bad. The good news is that you don't at all come off like a bitter little a-hole.Ryan32 wrote:it WAS 7 but hes been getting just unfair dice lately like i am losing the craziest rolls.
Plus i hate him i beat him first and he gets these unfair amazing rolls giving me no chance hes not a great player he blindly attacks 3-3 and wins them all the time.
BaldAdonis wrote:Ryan32 wrote:play me
That's a joke, right? You'd be lucky to win 3 in a fifty game series.
I lost 3 of my last 50 on Waterloo, that's why I picked those numbers. And most of those players were better than him. The problem would be that we'll have to wait for his current set to finish, and he only gets 4 at a time. Plus, I think he'd stop joining the games after he lost 12 in a row.Optimus Prime wrote:He might win more than 3 just on lucky drops and dice alone, but I would wager Ryan32 doesn't win more than 15 in a 50 games series with BaldAdonis.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users