leeports and joelee [busted]

by **Rozebud** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:30 am

These are suspected Multis

Suspect users: <leeports/joelee>

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=60651

Comments: leeports is playing yellow....I see a note to me from joelee (who isn't even in the game) in game chat after I (pink) attacked yellow...complaining that WE WILL LOSE if I keep attacking him...open and shut case I think...LOL Why else would joelee say WE, when he isn't even in the game..unless he is also leeports??? Besides...both names contain LEE.....DUH

)

<Rozebud>

by **wcaclimbing** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:57 pm

that happens a lot, its no big deal. YOu say jolee wasnt even in the game. there have been many times that i have been watching a game that one of my FRIENDS was in and commenting on it. there is no reason to suspect anyone of anything. Plus, blue did have a good chance of winning if you continued to attack. you would have gotten too weak while he continued expanding.

by **reverend_kyle** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:05 pm

I believe your wrong wca he said we as if he thought he was involved.

by **Rozebud** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:10 pm

joelee saying "WE" in the game chat (for game he isnt even in) is a flat out confession that he is Yellow/leeports

)

by **reverend_kyle** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:16 pm

I agree.. when do we get the banhammer.

by **happysadfun** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:21 pm

I did at one point think that they were multis, but why would he log in under joelee, search into his game, and comment on it? He would be admitting it and this is not likely.

by **ZawBanjito** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:24 pm

'cause he screwed up and forgot what account was open. We've seen it happen here loads of times, although not usually over PM.

by **happysadfun** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:36 pm

But he wasn't in the game. He would have to go thru Game Finder.

by **ZawBanjito** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:46 pm

It is a bit weird, isn't it? But maybe this guy is in the habit of making alliance calls over PM, had them all lined up in his head and just sent them out...

I dunno... that "we" is suspicious, though.

by **P Gizzle** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:52 pm

or maybe he just screwed up. there have been many times where i've typed something that i didnt mean to type when i was talking to someone.

by **happysadfun** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:13 pm

I agree, it's suspicious. But it's foggy and vague too.

by **ZawBanjito** on Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:23 pm

Well, it's an interesting question anyway! What are the rules regarding "third party" secret alliances? If you get a friend to just bombard someone else with PMs like, "I think you should attack this other guy, and maybe my friend will let you keep your continent if you do (maybe... just my OPINION, you understand...)" then are they avoiding the letter of the law, if not the spirit?

by **Rozebud** on Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:29 am

plus both names contain LEE...hmmmmmm

by **Twill** on Sat Oct 07, 2006 1:20 pm

It's an interesting one indeed from my side as well.

I'll go ahead and bust them because the evidence is against them and I kinda wanna hear their story anyhoo...

Busted.

Twill