Genghis Khan CA wrote:treefiddy wrote:It was you who asked for suggestions on how they could do their job.
I never asked for that... show me a quote where I asked for suggestions. You've already falsely accused sully of concluding there wasn't enough evidence rather than clearing him.
2nd to last post on the 5th page. Bolded so you can more easily remember what you wrote.
Genghis Khan CA wrote:He has been CLEARED...
if you can think of a technique of investigating, presumably those who have investigated hundreds of these cases know all these techniques plus more
Genghis Khan CA wrote:I just find it excessive to accuse someone on the basis of the same games when he has been cleared 2 days ago. The first one is fair enough, the second almost seems like harassment.
I agree with that. Like I stated earlier, I don't agree with the original poster, nor do I even care if Klobber is cheating. I just saw a question that I could answer, and answered it. That caused me to check back into the thread and continue posting in it. My first post was a response about how people use different IP addresses, the second was in response to your question for a technique to find out if he's cheating, then you respond by saying I'm insulting Sully and the other Hunters because I gave a suggestion.
I'd love to see you go into the Bugs and Suggestions forum and tell everyone who makes a suggestion that they are insulting Lack. This is the exact same thing you are doing in this situation.
Genghis Khan CA wrote:You don't think this is pretty rude? Basically saying he doesn't think the multi-hunters do a good job???
Yes, it can be looked at as being rude. I would not have made another post like the original poster did. That being said, I really don't care about the feelings of Sully or the other Hunters. Everyone makes mistakes at some point and the Hunters are no different. If their egos are so fragile that a suggestion as to how they could be more complete at their job would hurt them, then I don't think they are the right people for the job. If they already use that method, then it shouldn't be an insult because they've already used it to clear Klobber.
Genghis Khan CA wrote:So your suggestion would take 20 hours a week or 10 seconds? (I know you're saying the 20 hours is cumulative over all cases). Are you really suggesting that they would skip a 10 second action because they don't have enough time? How long do you think their investigations are - 5 seconds? 2 seconds? 1 second???
Using my suggestion on every single case that comes through would take a great deal of time. My guess is about 20 hours a week. If they do use my suggestions already, then there's no reason to re-do the actions of my suggestions because it has already been done. This is a simple matter of "Work To-Do" and "Work Done". Restating the work has been done will take 10 seconds. Actually doing the work will take much more time. I thought it was pretty clear the first time I wrote it out, so I'm not sure where the confusion is for you.
It's possible that what I suggested be checked in this case, would take way too long to do with every single case that pops up. Because of that, it's possible it's not done on every single case. Perhaps I'm over-estimating the time requirement of my suggestion though, so perhaps it's already being done for everyone. If that's the case, it reverts back to the "Work Done" category where the repost doesn't take any time at all to repost the "Cleared" report.
And because you asked, I'd guess each investigation ranges between 2-10 minutes. Just look for the strings of last poster "Sully800" and you can get a good idea as to how long each case takes to investigate, decide upon, and clear or bust. In some cases, the larger breaks could be due to outside distractions that have nothing to do with the investigation (Phone, IM, or even their own CC games).
Genghis Khan CA wrote:treefiddy wrote:That's why I'm still yet to be cleared after almost a year.
The real reason why you are posting here...
Of course. Because I've made such a fuss about it over the last 9 months.
It was mostly an example of the hunters missing something. Again, a sign that they are human, and not perfect.
So why the angst against my posts in this topic? If you're upset with the original poster, then feel free to take it up with him. I'm only participated in this thread because a question was asked that I knew the answer to.