dragonwarrior7/professorkimball same person [closed]

[argyll72]

These are suspected Multis

Suspect users: dragonwarrior7/professorkimball

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=75575

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=75574

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=75573

Comments: First of all look at there previous games played. They are in every game with each other. I wouldn't have noticed if I wasn't in three games with them. In the one game 75575 I had NA, SA, AF, EU and I end up loosing. Both users broke me and in the three games. professorkimball won all three games. The users never attack each other unless it' to take a continent. When I confronted them they claimed to be a father/son. But I'm not so sure. Even if they are father/son they did not declare an alliance in the game chat, which they had. So either way there is at least on rule being broken. Thank you for looking into this matter.

<argyll72>

[AK_iceman]

Sorry to say this, but these 2 players have already been accused TWICE of being multis and have been cleared both times.

[lackattack]

They've been accused 2 other times in the forum and a few times via email. Enough is enough! I've blocked them from playing together in the future. Even if they are father and son, they obviously don't play fair.

[argyll72]

so i'm out the 58 points then?

[lackattack]

suck it up, cupcake

[argyll72]

It was a simple question. I wasn't whining. I didn't know what procedure was. If a person uses two accounts and are found to be cheating does the other person get the points back or is it left as is? Thank you for answering my question.

respectfully

argyll72

[wicked]

suck it up, cupcake

grr... MY SAYING!

[lackattack]

We don't do point reversals. It's asking for trouble, plus it's extra work.

[argyll72]

Thank you.

[lackattack]

Update: I worked out a deal with them, they can continue to play together as long as - whenever they play as opponents - they post a warning in the game chat that. If people have a problem with that, there is always negative feedback.

[Dlakavi]

lol, it is "his son" and he is still learning,
"Son" has 300 points and the father has 1500.

And the "son" plays just fine until its only him and his "daddy" in the game.
Yeah right.


How much proof do You need

[ZawBanjito]

The father is a bum! My dad taught me Risk and he let me win at least every now and again. That's just good Freudianism.

[gavin_sidhu]

Update: I worked out a deal with them, they can continue to play together as long as - whenever they play as opponents - they post a warning in the game chat that. If people have a problem with that, there is always negative feedback.

Thats not very helpful for the person who gets burned points, theyre obviously cheating as Dlakavi pointed out. I preferred your first resolution.

[lackattack]

lol, it is "his son" and he is still learning,
"Son" has 300 points and the father has 1500.

And the "son" plays just fine until its only him and his "daddy" in the game.
Yeah right.


How much proof do You need

Gee I didn't realize that. In fact in all the standard games where it was just the two of them left, "father" won 36 times and "son" won 2 times. Very sketchy.

In light of this new evidence, I'm re-instating the block.