Conquer Club

The Texan Wars [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby rgbubba on Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:47 am

What do you think about the map without Tee-pees and Cannons?
___________________________________________________
I would like your input! Witch one do you like best and have better game play?

rgbubba
TEXAN WARS (FINAL FORGE)
Image Image
Last edited by rgbubba on Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby pepperonibread on Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:49 am

rgbubba wrote:What do you think about the map without Tee-pees and Cannons?


I vote keep them.
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Postby DiM on Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:04 pm

pepperonibread wrote:
rgbubba wrote:What do you think about the map without Tee-pees and Cannons?


I vote keep them.

me too. i like them.
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby Lone.prophet on Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:04 pm

ok since you asked nicely :)

1. the colors llok to much like each other which makes the legend not clear and can cause confusing for people with lesser eyesight

2. I dont like the capital like bonus but thats just me (bull wheel and star)

3. the flag doesnt fit in maybe make it a bit curly, or give it some distort

4. the grades or whatever dont suit well if you aint gonna give a grid.

5. the army circles, (i prefer them lighter as the rest of the map but thats no concern) arent they a bit small?

the gameplay looks good though i would love to play this
Image
Captain Lone.prophet
 
Posts: 1467
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Your basement Muahaha

Postby pepperonibread on Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:09 pm

The flag looks fine to me. Everything else on the map is so straight, I don't think a rippling flag would go well with the image. You could try it though.
Image
User avatar
Corporal pepperonibread
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Postby DiM on Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:10 pm

other thoughts
1. the army circles look a bit strange. perhaps make them like the army circles in d-day. i think those would fit better.
2. the tree colour is too bright, desaturate it a bit
3. make a -1 decay on the dead zone because that's a very important place.
4. make the bridges wooden
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby rgbubba on Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:12 pm

Thanks guys for you comments. I will try to make the changes you guys suggested.
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby Lone.prophet on Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:19 pm

pepperonibread wrote:The flag looks fine to me. Everything else on the map is so straight, I don't think a rippling flag would go well with the image. You could try it though.


the straight flag doesnt fit the texture IMO
Image
Captain Lone.prophet
 
Posts: 1467
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Your basement Muahaha

Postby rgbubba on Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:32 pm

BONUS POINTS ARE THEY TO HIGH?
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby DiM on Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:13 pm

rgbubba wrote:BONUS POINTS ARE THEY TO HIGH?


i like them as they are.
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

New Update!

Postby rgbubba on Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:24 pm

600x600 with lighter circles and wooden bridges
Image

800x800 with lighter circles and wooden bridges
Image
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby DiM on Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:29 pm

i like it. the flag looks great.

could you also post the xml test with army numbers?

one thing i don't like is the black border around the map. especially since in the large one side has no border while another has a very thick one
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby gimil on Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:31 pm

Leaky and DFW are missing army circles. I also noticed that the colorblind issues oaktown addressed hasnt been issued.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby DiM on Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:34 pm

gimil wrote:Leaky and DFW are missing army circles.


no they aren't. they both have circles. you're going blind now? :lol:
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby gimil on Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:41 pm

DiM wrote:
gimil wrote:Leaky and DFW are missing army circles.


no they aren't. they both have circles. you're going blind now? :lol:


well there horribly difficult to see :P
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby WidowMakers on Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:06 pm

The large map looks a little blurry. Did you just scale up the small one?

WM
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby oaktown on Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:40 am

blurry indeed.

Sorry I've been away for a few days - I'll try to give this map some attention this week.

Colorblind issue: if you could play with the color of East Texas we might be able to knock this problem out... i find East, Central, and Gulf Coast difficult to distinguish.

What exactly is central about Central Texas? :?
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Postby Wisse on Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:52 am

the digits at the top and at the right side of the map aren't readable (on the small map)
Image Image
User avatar
Sergeant Wisse
 
Posts: 4448
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: The netherlands, gelderland, epe

Postby rgbubba on Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:53 pm

Thanks guys! I will sort out the problems as soon as I can!
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby rgbubba on Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:25 pm

With Border fixed, circle darken abd East Texas darken

600X600 darker East Texas
Image

800x800 darker East Texas
Image
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby rgbubba on Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:27 pm

oaktown wrote:blurry indeed.

Sorry I've been away for a few days - I'll try to give this map some attention this week.

Colorblind issue: if you could play with the color of East Texas we might be able to knock this problem out... i find East, Central, and Gulf Coast difficult to distinguish.

What exactly is central about Central Texas? :?


Yes I know that looks fun but it's true. They call it Central Texas. I have lived here most of my life and I still don't know why.
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby cazmart on Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:17 am

Map looks good - can't wait to play.............

but since I am from texas also and live in Midland - the geographical stuff bugs me - i have not went through the rest of the posts so i do not know if this has been brought up -

Midland would be better as Andrews
Odessa better as San Angelo(especially if that is going to be Hill Country)
Big spring is also definitely not hill country but west texas -

Since I live in this area (raised in Big Spring - Lived in Midland for 10years - 40years total in this area) I guess that is why those bother me the most -

I know you are limited by borders and such but I also feel that it needs to be closer to truth (Midland is between Odessa and Big Spring) than the way it is even if that means i lose my beloved Midland!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class cazmart
 
Posts: 616
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Texas

Postby rgbubba on Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:35 am

cazmart wrote:Map looks good - can't wait to play.............

but since I am from texas also and live in Midland - the geographical stuff bugs me - i have not went through the rest of the posts so i do not know if this has been brought up -

Midland would be better as Andrews
Odessa better as San Angelo(especially if that is going to be Hill Country)
Big spring is also definitely not hill country but west texas -

Since I live in this area (raised in Big Spring - Lived in Midland for 10years - 40years total in this area) I guess that is why those bother me the most -

I know you are limited by borders and such but I also feel that it needs to be closer to truth (Midland is between Odessa and Big Spring) than the way it is even if that means i lose my beloved Midland!


Thanks for bring up this issue. I have looked into it and have changed that area serval time for other people. I have overlaid many maps to make sure it's as close as it can get. I have friends in those area as well and have been over there many times. Let me think about it and I'll get back to you . But in the meantime you can see the latess post on page 29 or 30.
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby rgbubba on Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:46 am

btownmeggy wrote:What map is this? New Boston is farther east than Mt. Pleasant.

Image


Here is one of the maps I used from other helpful contributers
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby rgbubba on Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:17 am

cazmart wrote:Map looks good - can't wait to play.............

but since I am from texas also and live in Midland - the geographical stuff bugs me - i have not went through the rest of the posts so i do not know if this has been brought up -

Midland would be better as Andrews
Odessa better as San Angelo(especially if that is going to be Hill Country)
Big spring is also definitely not hill country but west texas -

Since I live in this area (raised in Big Spring - Lived in Midland for 10years - 40years total in this area) I guess that is why those bother me the most -

I know you are limited by borders and such but I also feel that it needs to be closer to truth (Midland is between Odessa and Big Spring) than the way it is even if that means i lose my beloved Midland!


Here are the name changes on the map. Do you agree?

600x600 name change
Image

800x800 name change
Image
User avatar
Private rgbubba
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Location: USA

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users