Moderator: Cartographers
cairnswk wrote:edbeard wrote:don't you think it's confusing that the background of the Cauldron on the legend is the same colour as the Gazala line on the map?
And, vice versa
I realize the names help distinguish this, but still. It seems like an unnecessary possible confusion.
I know why you have the colours that way on the legend though. Gives a bit of contrast. At least that's my impression.
Actually edbeard, in don't find anything wrong with it.
In fact, and don't take offense, i find that the number of people out there who don't read instructions, and can't distinguish certain things on maps....i wonder if there is a totally dislexic generation raoming about that are simply too lazy to figure some things out for themselves without having everything spelled out for them in black and white when real estate is limited.
You already know the issues that have been raised by waterloo, just before i posted this, someone PMed em to say "what contintent is waterloo in"
I just about bloodywell give in.
However, i will change them around just for you.
DiM wrote:cairns, i thought you knew this by now that people are dumb and they will most likely fail to understand the rules of a map even if those rules are spelled perfectly in the legend. yes some maps may be harder than others but that just means you have to read the legend a couple of times. it's not really rocket science
cairnswk wrote:Your changes are in Version 25.
gimil wrote:Ok cairns bear with me ill get you what you need once i get access to photobucket. The backdating of stamps aint no fun lol
cairnswk wrote:gimil wrote:Ok cairns bear with me ill get you what you need once i get access to photobucket. The backdating of stamps aint no fun lol
Thanks Gimil, i was wondering when some might be applied, if this map is justified in awarding such stars.
Our awarders seem to be on hols at present.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
cairnswk wrote:DiM wrote:the graphics are top notch except for 2 minor issues
first the land mines. they should be dark green camouflage or desert camouflage not purple. as they are they don't look too pretty because they draw your attention away. so i think a brown green thing would work better.
second, each arrow on the map has a white tail. why? i mean i love the way the tan trails blend into the arrows but that bit of white spoils the effect.
Done!yeti_c wrote:Thirdly - the mines on the smaller map are much easier to distinguish than the ones on the larger map.
And Done!
Version 25
yeti_c wrote:cairnswk wrote:DiM wrote:the graphics are top notch except for 2 minor issues
first the land mines. they should be dark green camouflage or desert camouflage not purple. as they are they don't look too pretty because they draw your attention away. so i think a brown green thing would work better.
second, each arrow on the map has a white tail. why? i mean i love the way the tan trails blend into the arrows but that bit of white spoils the effect.
Done!yeti_c wrote:Thirdly - the mines on the smaller map are much easier to distinguish than the ones on the larger map.
And Done!
Version 25
Love the new mines.
C.
asl80 wrote:Nice updates cairns - the mine colours are much more fitting.
just one suggestion for the legend, maybe you could place "airports, towns, tobruk, gazala line, cauldron" following the axis partners, then the allied partner names following the towns and inbetweens i've mentioned here. or even have some dividers in the legend between the sides and inbetweens.
(bit unsure of the darkness of the grey grading around lumsden)
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:I really like hte grundgy feel of this map cairns, i have some very small concerns that i would class as nitpicking so 1st and foremost:
Now that ive softened you up :
-The yellow/green glow in the names on the sea arnt so nice (In my opinion) a different may be better, but im not sure what
- Some terr names are a little unlegable on there backgrounds, e.g. toburk garr 3, Ransdens 50th.
-And the silver boxes in the lower left corner could do with the whites intensity being reduced.
gimil wrote:I really like hte grundgy feel of this map cairns, i have some very small concerns that i would class as nitpicking so 1st and foremost:
Now that ive softened you up :
-The yellow/green glow in the names on the sea arnt so nice (In my opinion) a different may be better, but im not sure what
- Some terr names are a little unlegable on there backgrounds, e.g. toburk garr 3, Ransdens 50th.
-And the silver boxes in the lower left corner could do with the whites intensity being reduced.
gimil wrote:I had some big reserves about the graphics when I first noticed this map, but ive grown to love them
Users browsing this forum: No registered users