Page 1 of 2

The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)cancelled

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:52 pm
by max is gr8
Premium Only

This tournament only requires YOU to win 2 or 3 matches (possibly more) then you no longer play but use logic and knowledge of your team and the opposition to earn victory, but if you lose you must start to fight for your leader and help your general to victory.

Army Size Progression
Round 1 - No Army
Round 2 - 1 Army
Round 3 - 3 Armies
Round 4 - 7 Armies
Round 5 - 14 Armies

Round 1 - 32 Generals down to 16 Generals

This is a best out of 3 Round, the winner of this will earn their first army, and first battalion, capture the opponents general twice to win.

Round 2 - 16 Generals down to 8 Generals

This is a best out of 3 Round, with a twist.

Last rounds winner gets to pick one game they wish to play, and the loser of the last round plays the other two. The TEAM who wins the most advances and their army begins to amass, from this moment forward the champion does not need to win a game AND the game becomes tactical

Round 3 - 8 Generals down to 4 Generals

This is a best out of 3 Sets of 3

There will be 3 different set-ups of games, (e.g. one escalating, one chained and one no cards) and then the general picks which type of this game he wants each of his army to play in. If an army wins 2 of 3 on a setting they earn a set point, if the general wins 2 or more sets of 3 he collects 4 new armies (3 defeated armies plus general)

Round 4 - 4 Generals down to 2 Generals

This is a best of 7 sets of 3

This is the same as the above, however the losing general will be killed in conflict.

Round 5 - 2 Generals down to the Master of Warfare

This will probably be the longest round as it will simulate a longer war.
Each sub-round the generals will send forward their armies into skirmishes for certain locations/to defend certain locations.
If an army loses 3 skirmishes they will die
This continues until either:
1 Player owns all of this "Map" (This player instantly wins) OR
1 Player has no armies remaining
In the latter case the general has 2 choices, to surrender (and be able to compete in the army warfare bracket 2) or to fight a best of 3 1v1 with every army remaining in the opponents control, these skirmishes completely annihilate the army no matter how many "lives" remaining, If they beat every army then the 2 generals will play 1v1s (In batches of 25) until: 1 player wins 10 more than the opponent or 100 games have been played

The settings vary but the following will never occur
Anything other than 1v1
Freestyle
Objective Maps

THIS TOURNAMENT WILL HAVE 1 CAPTAIN WINNER AND 14 OTHER WINNERS (ALL WIN BUT THESE ARE SECOND PLACE)

Players:

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:25 pm
by max is gr8
Reserved

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:07 pm
by Stephan Wayne
im a little confused about the set up but i like the many 1vs1 games
im in

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:38 pm
by rjgirardi
I'm in if you just pm me what games to join!

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:57 pm
by zissou2
i'll play

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:50 pm
by nicarus
i'll play

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:51 pm
by trickynick81
i'm in

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:51 pm
by the heebie
sign me up.

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:00 pm
by Jackofalltrades
interesting concept i'm in

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
by acores2005
i'll play

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:18 pm
by Kotaro
in

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:30 pm
by endar1077
I'm in. : )

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (0/32)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:02 am
by JoJo123
i'm in

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (11/32)

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:24 am
by ralphcptc
i will play

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:37 pm
by whitestazn88
not in, but did you say everyone wins?

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 10:46 am
by riv74
hi im in if there still a place

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:33 am
by Godd
I'll play

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:32 pm
by max is gr8
whitestazn88 wrote:not in, but did you say everyone wins?


No I say that 15 players win, 1 as General of Army, 14 as their army.

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:51 pm
by AtreidesHouse
in

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 10:52 pm
by OlJock99
Little confused on the format, but sign me up. =D>

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:23 pm
by topper
count me in , thanks

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:17 pm
by Zorbas
count me in
thanks

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:33 am
by endar1077
I think I've read this 3 times over the last month (or so it seems to have been floating around for that long). For some reason, I only just began to grasp how it works. I think that if you pay attention to the whole description, it starts to make sense by the end, but it isn't clear from the beginning that the "armies" you are talking about are actually other players under your command.

That said, I think this sounds like a GREAT idea. I'm totally down for this. Please count me in, and I hope that this manages to fill up, otherwise I'm going to be a bit upset.

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:54 am
by calchmbrs
im in

Re: The Army Warfare Bracket (1v1) (12/32)

PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:59 pm
by agile76
Still a little uncertain about the logistics but I'm in.