Page 1 of 2

Organizers versus players(12/64) (no freestyle)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:51 pm
by Mr_Adams
I want to run a tournament for everyone out there who has ever taken the time and the effort to run a tournament before. here's how it will work.

I've edited out the freestyle in order to apease the premium peoples who hate freestyle...

brackets:

1)ran 1 or more tournament before

kratos644
hulmey
Sliver2
Murphy16
Lufsen75
wpg27offsuit
7)
8)

2)ran 2 or more tournaments before

Mr_Adams
inflrc
Boss_oss_ss
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

3)ran 3 or more tournaments before

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

4)ran 4 or more tournaments before

Natewolfman
barterer2002
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

5)open to the public from here on out:

This first on will be mostly for those currently running thier first.

fireedud
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

6)2nd set open to the public

bigdaddyslim2
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

7)3rd set of public

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)

8)4th set of public

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)


round 1: 2 games within each bracket
4 player
doubles
WWII western front
sunny
escalating
unlimited
sequential

winning teams moves on

round two: one game within each bracket

4 players
terminator
classic
sunny
escalating
chained
sequential

last 2 standing move on

round three:
8 player
doubles
World 2.1
sunny
escalating
adjacent
sequential

winning team moves on

final round
4 player
standard
classic
sunny
escalating
unlimited
sequential

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:53 pm
by Optimus Prime
Not going to work, Mr_Adams. It will be considered a private tournament. Not to mention that there are only 4 or 5 organizers past the 7 tournament mark. Good idea, but not for a public tournament, sorry.

Regards, Optimus Prime

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:56 pm
by Natewolfman
Optimus Prime wrote:Not going to work, Mr_Adams. It will be considered a private tournament. Not to mention that there are only 4 or 5 organizers past the 7 tournament mark. Good idea, but not for a public tournament, sorry.

Regards, Optimus Prime

well that just means you only have to beat 1 person in the last group OP :lol:

good idea though :)

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:18 pm
by barterer2002
It depends if you count only finished tourneys or include ongoing doesn't it.

I would suggest that if you want to run this set your criteria for half the tourney for TOs and open the other half to the public. I believe the requirement is that at least 50% of the tourney must be open to the public.

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:39 pm
by Mr_Adams
OP, your really staring to make me hate you :lol:

This is the fourth idea for a tournament that you guys have decided not to allow. I'd be above that 7 mark if it weren't for the rules :P

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:40 pm
by Night Strike
Mr_Adams wrote:OP, your really staring to make me hate you :lol:

This is the fourth idea for a tournament that you guys have decided not to allow. I'd be above that 7 mark if it weren't for the rules :P


Then read the rules first. ;)

Or just run your idea by a TD via PM BEFORE posting it. Several people do.

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:41 pm
by Optimus Prime
Mr_Adams wrote:OP, your really staring to make me hate you :lol:

This is the fourth idea for a tournament that you guys have decided not to allow. I'd be above that 7 mark if it weren't for the rules :P

It's not that we decided not to allow it, it's that you made tournaments that simply don't follow the rules set forth for the creation of the tournaments. Don't hate the messenger. ;)

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:48 pm
by Mr_Adams
well if the messanger would bring some good news ocasionaly!

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:51 pm
by Optimus Prime
With the reorganization you are free to proceed, Mr_Adams. You are now within the rules, although finding 32 tournament organizers might be a bit tough. You may need to do some PMing to get those filled up. Other than that you are good to go. Might want to think about adjusting your title, but that's just me.

Regards, Optimus Prime

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:59 pm
by Night Strike
Geez, I don't think he meant PM them immediately. :roll: :roll:

I was going to join, but then I saw that it was freestyle. If you change some of the settings, I'll check back in a few weeks when I return and see if there are any spots open.

Re: The tournement for the tournament runners(1/64)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:00 pm
by Natewolfman
Optimus Prime wrote:With the reorganization you are free to proceed, Mr_Adams. You are now within the rules, although finding 32 tournament organizers might be a bit tough. You may need to do some PMing to get those filled up. Other than that you are good to go. Might want to think about adjusting your title, but that's just me.

Regards, Optimus Prime

very true... it takes some time for the tournament organizer tourny (only 9 players) to fill :P but i hope you make it!

im in, i have completed 11 tournaments with about 11 or so more in the ongoing area

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:06 am
by kratos644
I've completed 1 and have 3 ongoing so what bracket would I be in.

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:25 am
by inflrc
I am in, have completed 2.

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:05 am
by hulmey
thank you my friend :D count me in

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:50 am
by insomniacdude
Thanks for the offer, but I'll pass. Good luck in the tournament.

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:25 am
by jpcloet
Thanks for the invite. I've run 2 tournaments and I don't play freestyle, so I won't be joining unless the settings change.

Also, How are the doubles teams decided?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:31 am
by amazzony
Sorry, Mr, but I only play doubles (and freestyle) with my one and only (doubles) partner.

If you wish to make something so specific (like for TOs) then I suggest you to go with more prefered and liked setting (for example, sequential and standard). I wouldn't have anything against a tournament TOs vs others but in this case I won't be joining.

Good luck!

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:26 am
by barterer2002
I'll join, I've got 8 completed, 7 ongoing, and one in sign ups.

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:38 am
by Godd
had me excited at first but then I see Doubles and Freestyle, Sorry but will have to pass myself

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:56 am
by Indianz Conquer
Hi

Sign me up, I would love to play. Hopefully this will be much better and more exciting than my l337 conquerors tourny.

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:10 am
by fireedud
I have 1 ongoing if that counts... if not I'm in for the other half.

Re: Organizers versus players(1/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:14 am
by Mr_Adams
sorry fire,i'm going by the number on people's placs. you have no plac, soooooo...

Re: Organizers versus players(7/64)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:21 pm
by Sliver 2
i'm in. I have completed 1 and am working on the second. I like the idea :P

Re: Organizers versus players(8/64)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:09 pm
by Mr_Adams
bump

Re: Organizers versus players(8/64)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:20 pm
by murphy16
Im in!!! I have ran 1 tourney before.