Page 1 of 1
On ward, loosers!(3/16)(changed because title was taken....)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 6:46 pmby Mr_Adams
6settings
Sequential
Classic
Escalating
3 and 4 player games
Standard
What sets this tournament apart? The loosers move on to the next round! This is the one tournament youDON'T want to win!
Why should you join? To brag! "I got out of that tournament in round1!!"
players:
Mylittlepuddykat
Mr_Adams
Terminalcase56
amazzony
Terminalcase56
Re: the worst of the worst tournament(1/3^81)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 7:01 pmby FabledIntegral
How would this work? I guess I would join and go for the win anyways for points.
Re: the worst of the worst tournament(1/3^81)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 7:43 pmby Mr_Adams
only loosers advance...
Re: Don't come in last!(1/192)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 8:29 pmby colson
Your tournament makes no sense. If you have 4 players that are all trying to lose the game will never end as no-one would attack each other.
Re: Don't come in last!(1/192)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 8:31 pmby killmanic
yeah no one will ever be eliminated
Re: Don't come in last!(1/192)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 8:31 pmby westsidekilla6
lmao yea wtf. I don't get this at all
Re: Don't come in last!(1/192)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 8:38 pmby poptartpsycho18
For this one I think he means that the people who win the games will be eliminated, while the players who lose the games will go on to the next round.
So a better title would be: "The Come in Last Tournament"!
Re: Don't come in last!(1/192)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 10:25 pmby Mr_Adams
But the idea is that you DON'T want to win this tournament!
Re: Don't come in last!(1/192)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 10:28 pmby killmanic
why would you enter something where if you do well you cant win?
Re: Don't come in last!(1/192)
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2008 10:29 pmby Mr_Adams
for fun. You want to win the games, not the tournament...
Your so narrow minded
Posted:
Mon May 26, 2008 2:35 amby amazzony
And you don't have enough players. New tournament rules (or they aren't that new anymore
) say that minimum players in a tournament is 16. So figure out a way how to make it at least 16 player tourney
Btw, I'm in. I'm not that good at winning games anyway
Re: On ward, loosers!(1/12)(changed because title was taken....)
Posted:
Mon May 26, 2008 3:34 amby poptartpsycho18
You also have to make it a rule that dead-beating (missing turns), doesn't count as losing in this tournament. Otherwise that's how people will try to "win" the tourney. Man, whoever "wins" will have lost EVERY game they played! Along w/ a bunch of points....
Re: On ward, loosers!(1/12)(changed because title was taken....)
Posted:
Mon May 26, 2008 5:38 amby Mylittlepuddykat
I'll play.
The rest of you are missing the point, the aim of this Tourney is NOT to win. Winning this tourney shows you are awful at CC. You WANT to go out in the earliest round possible!
Re: On ward, loosers!(1/12)(changed because title was taken....)
Posted:
Mon May 26, 2008 7:30 amby poptartpsycho18
Mylittlepuddykat wrote:I'll play.
The rest of you are missing the point, the aim of this Tourney is NOT to win. Winning this tourney shows you are awful at CC. You WANT to go out in the earliest round possible!
Oh I get the point--I just know that if I did it I'd end up being the winning loser
. So no thanks, but I hope he gets some others interested.
Re: On ward, loosers!(2/16)(changed because title was taken....)
Posted:
Tue May 27, 2008 11:52 amby Terminalcase56
Sure, I'll try it.
Re: On ward, loosers!(3/16)(changed because title was taken....)
Posted:
Thu May 29, 2008 8:15 amby Optimus Prime
In order to win this tournament, you will effectively have to throw the game, correct? Throwing games is against the rules, so... I'm thinking this isn't such a good idea. We don't give out tournament privileges to tournaments that break the rules.
— Optimus Prime